Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That is great news. Many people would have given up and paid after losing two appeals so well done for hanging in and fighting. It has paid off and they have finally backed down before getting whipped in Court. I looked at your NTD and your NTK again to see if there was a chance of going for a breach of your GDPR. Sadly although your NTK on its own could have well deserved a claim, the NTD is good enough not to warrant a claim even though it wasn;t compliant with PoFA. As it is the first Notice that mostly accounts for  GDPR breaches there is a reasonable cause for the NTD to have been issued. However you are now freed from worries about appearing in Court and you have learnt about the dangers of parking especially where the rogues that patrol private parking spaces are concerned. Thank you for making a donation and should you fall victim in the future to the parking rogues or anything else that we protect from, you are always welcome .
    • Hi guys I'm about to submit the defence as per below     There has been no reply to our CPR 31:14 request.  Is it worth adding that I (driver, not registered keeper) didn't actually enter or park in the car park and was sat at the petrol station forecourt the entire time?  Or is that covered by the simple points?   Thanks
    • a DCA is not a bailiff and cant enforce anything, even if they've been to court who are they please? sar to the original creditor FIO isnt applicable they are not a public body. who was this query sent too all the more reason to teach her young upon how these powerless DCA's monsters  work... she must stop payments now  
    • Unsettling the applecart?,  I'm going to be direct here, I know how this works , I've been in far worse situation than your relative, and I can assure you , now that there i likely a default in her name, it makes absolutely ZERO difference if she pays or not. Denzel Washington in the Equalizer , 'My only regret is that I can't kill you twice'... It's the same with a default, they can only do it once and it stays on your credit file for 6 years if she pays or not, and as it stands right now she's flushing £180 of her hard earned money down the toilet  so that the chaps at Lowell can afford a Christmas party. As for the SAR this is everybody's legal right, originally under the Data Protection act 1998 and now under GDPR, it's her right to find out everything that the original Creditor has on her file, and by not doing it the only person she is doing a massive disservice to is her self. As the father of 2 young adults myself, they need to learn at some point.. right?
    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

initial claim queries


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6643 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i am currently preparing a claim against rbs, most of my charges are for unpaid items and referal charge, can these be claimed i am unclear if referal charges come under the unfair penalty charges. As this is a business acc claim on following instructions in your step by step instructions i have used the spreadsheet that says that this will calculate the interest at 8% apr as allowed by s.64 the county courts act ( 1984 ) . as my account goes back to 2000/2001 this adds up to a lot of money, I wanted to know is this to be included in the initial claim letter as advocated in your step by step instructions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8% is not included in the initial calim. You add that when you get to court.

 

Don't know what referral charge is. Ask the bank what it refers to. Another name for penalty I expect

Link to post
Share on other sites

its when somethings referred to them to decide wether to pay it or not. I've paid £80 to £100 each time in referal charges!!! They have expensive thought processes!!! So in my first letter I just ask for the total of the charges, without any interest? Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the referral has involved some special process such as manual intervention, then it may not be a disproportionate penalty.

 

Do they charge for an unpaid item plue a referral charge for the same iteM

 

Do they charge a referral fee for every unpaid item or only for some?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told I had a £2000 overdaft facility, but when my business was failing and my accountant had a meeting with the business manager to sort things out he asked why there were so many massive charges on the account which were crippling the business. We were then told that he hadn't actually put an overdraft on the account, just what he explained as an unofficial overdraft, where every transaction was referred to him to authorise and he charged an extra £20 a time for the privelege, as well as the charge for going overdrawn. My accountant did ask him if he could do anything about these charges as it was not our fault he didn't put an official od on the account but he refused and said there was nothing he could do to help us. He did not actually do anything manually, just make a decision yea or nay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is your accountant prepared to make a statement and give evidence?

 

Do the T&Cs refer at all to unofficial overdrafts or any similar facility?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i ended up selling the business over 4 years ago so i have not got a copy of the t+c, i just wandered if anyone on the site has had any experience of referal charges as they are quite common.thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you like to respond to the questions which I asked you

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the referral has involved some special process such as manual intervention, then it may not be a disproportionate penalty.

 

Do they charge for an unpaid item plue a referral charge for the same iteM

 

Do they charge a referral fee for every unpaid item or only for some?

And these questions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You really need to understand more about the referral.

 

I think that you will need to start accumulating information to build a case. It will mean a DPA request, I'm afraid but you will have to modify it to obtain all information relating to the conduct of your account since it stated and in partcular any deatils of any manual intervention which was applied to your accoutn when deciding whether or not to pay a bill.

 

Also you need to contact the accountant and ask him about the meeting.

He will have charged you for his time so he will have a note of it and may well remember when you talk to him about it.

 

Also, where is the manager who gave you this unofficial overdraft? Is he still there? you need his name and at some point you may beed to try and interview him - tricky but he would have to be able to explain in court why he was approving all of these payments when you didn't have an overdraft facility.

It would be very interesting to know if at some level bank staff are paid commission on the charges.

If the accountant remembers then you don't need to worry so much about the manager.

Link to post
Share on other sites

rbs have already given me my statements for this account at a cost of 5 pounds, is it worth writing to the bank asking them to clarify excactly what a referral charge is for, what it entails, and how it is implemented.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, why not. They won't give you a reply but at least you are on record as having attempted dialogue with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello john,

i don't know if this is any help but i've had stacks of referal charges applied to my accounts which are just normal current accounts so these don't seem to be exclusive to business accounts. when i asked what they were for they said it was purely the fact that someone has to make a decision at branch level whether or not to pay it. i assume they would refer to this as manual intervention.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/06/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support their.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6643 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...