Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All, I've just had the inevitable N24 and other paperwork arrive. I've read other examples on here and I think I understand the steps to follow. I have until the 28th May to return the N180 Small Claims Direction Questionnaire, I also have an N244 Application notice copy. I read an update on a case you kindly put a link in for me to read. Turns out they lost in court and are now struggling. I really don't want to get to that stage and am thinking mediation may be the way forward? Thoughts please? Pretty sure I've missed the 7 days to have the order set aside.  For reference, this is what I received: Dated 8th May Before Deputy District Judge Baker sitting at the Civil National Business Centre, 4th Floor St Katharine's House, 21-27 St Katharine's Street, Northampton, NN1 2LH   The Court will deal with the application to lift the stay without hearing under CPR 23.8(c)   It is ordered that:   The Application to lift the stay and for direction questionnaires to be issued is granted.   Because this Order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the Order set aside, varied or stayed. A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this Order. If the application is one which requires a hearing, and   a) the party making the application is the Defendant; and b) the Defendant is an individual,   then upon the filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the Defendant's home court. In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.  
    • no ftmdave ive not emailed at ceo level..i did not know you could do that....but i will do now, thanks. ive just been wasting time emailing to customer complaints department
    • Dx, I've now blocked out and attached a copy of the letter that I'm responding tonight.
    • You mention that Iceland have been useless, and that has been our experience too in other cases. However, have you escalated to CEO level?  https://www.ceoemail.com/s.php?id=ceo-9061&c=Iceland Foods-Chief Executive If not, it has to be worth an e-mail.  Mention immediately, first line, that you are disabled and have been a victim of disability discrimination on the part of the shop's agents. The idea may fail miserably, but nothing ventured ...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Guidelines - Requests For An Original Agreement Under The Consumer Credit Act 1974


gizmo111
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3490 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

[Their address]

 

[Date]

 

[Your address]

 

Account number: xxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Dear sir or madam

 

Request for true copy of Credit Agreement under Sections 77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

I wrote to you recently requesting a true, signed copy of any credit agreement that exists in relation to the above account. This is my right under Sections 77 and 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 on payment of the statutory fee of £1.00. This payment was included with my original request.

 

Under the terms of the above Act, a creditor has 12 working days to provide the requested document. Should they fail to do this, they have a further calendar month to rectify this default. Failure to comply within these timescales is a criminal offence.

 

Both of these deadlines have now passed and I have received nothing in relation to my request. This can lead me to only one conclusion, that being that no signed credit agreement exists in relation to this account.

 

As I am sure you are aware, an agreement that does not contain all of the prescribed terms, and/or is not signed by the debtor, is completely unenforceable, even in a court of law. This will be a complete defence to any court action that you may consider taking.

 

On the advice of the Financial Ombudsman, I am now requesting a final decision in this matter from you. Should this decision not meet with my satisfaction, then I will pursue the matter through the Ombudsman. The maximum timescale for you to give a final response to any complaint is 8 weeks. This time runs from the date of my original complaint, in this case that is the request for a true copy of the credit agreement. Therefore, you must provide me with a final response in this matter, including your proposed actions for this account, by [insert date].

 

Please note, you may also consider this letter a statutory notice under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with the credit reference agencies. Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’, you must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

There has never been any regulated agreement in relation to this account, and therefore you have never had my consent to process my data. I also do not see how you can state that you have a legitimate interest in processing my data as we have never had any contract that would enable you to do this.

 

Should you fail to respond within 21 days, I will expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore, you should remember that a creditor is not permitted to take any action against an account whilst it remains in dispute. The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and therefore the following applies:

  • You may not demand any payment on this account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.
  • You may not add any further interest or charges to this account.
  • You may not pass this account to any third party.
  • You may not register any information in respect of this account with any of the credit reference agencies.
  • You may not issue a default notice related to this account.

Be warned, the CCA 1974 is clear that a default can only be issued for breach of a valid, regulated agreement. If there is no agreement, as in this case, then you cannot issue a default as I have not breached any valid, regulated agreement.

 

I look forward to your final decision on this complaint within 21 days. This should include your proposed actions in relation to the lack of a credit agreement.

 

Yours faithfully

 

[Your name]

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi

Ian thankyou, I presume there is not a template but your letter looks good.

as i have just recieved my short application form in response to my cca request to CAP1 i will be using this letter soon

Thanks again.

Maybe you could request your letter to be used as template.

Gill

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok after reading many pages i have a few questions about credit agreements.

 

I have in front of me a document that is three pages in total that make up an application / agreement:-

 

 

Page 1 clearly says 'Summary of your Application' and goes onto give other waffle about credit checks and such. Now stamped right in the middle of this page is a stamp saying 'Received for and on behalf of the Issuer' A date is underneath, then under the date a little squiggle. (the issuer is Tesco Credit Card / RBS). Not anywhere on this first page are the words 'Credit Card Agreement Regulated by The Consumer Credit Act 1974)

 

Page 2. On this page the title is 'Credit Card Agreement Regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974). It has the debtors name and address. It has all the key financial information. APR, Timing of payments, amount of payments, other information, how charges are calculated etc. There is not a credit limit.

 

Page 3 there is key information namely default charges which are all set at £20.00. It says missing payments will affect your credit file, theft loss or misue of the card, and a right to cancel. The right to cancel says 'Once you have signed this agreement you will have a shorty time in which you can cancel it. We will send you exact details of how and when you can do this' Under the right to cancel box is the signature of the debtor.

 

Now to me this seems like it is an enforceable agreement. But want i want to know is even though Tesco have been in default and committed a criminal offence they have produced an agreement that may be enforcable but is it only enforcable by the court?

 

Should thier 'signature' or stamp be on the same page that refers to the agreement and signature of the debtor? (It is currently on the application page)

 

The charges are unlawfull so doesn't this automatically render the agreement unenforcable as under contract law for a contract to be legally binding the purpose of the agreement must not be illegal?

 

Is a application / agreement acceptable under the CCA 1974?

 

Does it make a difference that the detailed statement of account that was requested with the CCA was not supplied?

 

All of this was probably answered somewhere but CAG has grown so big it takes ages to find anything.

 

Maybe i am being a tad pedantic but hey why shouldnt i be!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok after reading many pages i have a few questions about credit agreements.

 

I have in front of me a document that is three pages in total that make up an application / agreement:-

 

 

Page 1 clearly says 'Summary of your Application' and goes onto give other waffle about credit checks and such. Now stamped right in the middle of this page is a stamp saying 'Received for and on behalf of the Issuer' A date is underneath, then under the date a little squiggle. (the issuer is Tesco Credit Card / RBS). Not anywhere on this first page are the words 'Credit Card Agreement Regulated by The Consumer Credit Act 1974)

 

Page 2. On this page the title is 'Credit Card Agreement Regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974). It has the debtors name and address. It has all the key financial information. APR, Timing of payments, amount of payments, other information, how charges are calculated etc. There is not a credit limit.

 

Page 3 there is key information namely default charges which are all set at £20.00. It says missing payments will affect your credit file, theft loss or misue of the card, and a right to cancel. The right to cancel says 'Once you have signed this agreement you will have a shorty time in which you can cancel it. We will send you exact details of how and when you can do this' Under the right to cancel box is the signature of the debtor.

 

Now to me this seems like it is an enforceable agreement. But want i want to know is even though Tesco have been in default and committed a criminal offence they have produced an agreement that may be enforcable but is it only enforcable by the court?

 

Should thier 'signature' or stamp be on the same page that refers to the agreement and signature of the debtor? (It is currently on the application page)

 

The charges are unlawfull so doesn't this automatically render the agreement unenforcable as under contract law for a contract to be legally binding the purpose of the agreement must not be illegal?

 

Is a application / agreement acceptable under the CCA 1974?

 

Does it make a difference that the detailed statement of account that was requested with the CCA was not supplied?

 

All of this was probably answered somewhere but CAG has grown so big it takes ages to find anything.

 

Maybe i am being a tad pedantic but hey why shouldnt i be!

 

Hiya,

 

Is it the same as this one of mine(#7777): http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/33174-consumer-credit-act-agreements-389.html

 

If so, it looks like it's enforcable :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

 

Is it the same as this one of mine(#7777): http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/33174-consumer-credit-act-agreements-389.html

 

If so, it looks like it's enforcable :(

 

 

Thank you for that, i was in fact trolling the pages of that thread but didn't quite get 300 odd, was getting a bit fidgety!

 

It looks like it is the same, out of a three page document the first is an application the last two are agreements. I realised it was probably enforecable when i saw it but i thought i'm buggered if i'm going to let this go without a fight considering it has taken them since April to provide it. I would love to hear them explain to the judge why it took them so long! ( can you have an application and agreement in the same document?)

 

what is bugging me is the fact that the charges in the agreement are unlawful so that should make the agreement unenforcable:? ( i refer back to my bit about contract law)

 

I will try my luck, i cant see what i got to lose, they have given me until the 8 August to respond...how nice of them

 

What avenue did you take after receiving yours?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't need to provide a credit limit as long as they put in a general statement like "we will from time to time determine your credit limit". They do however need to tie the two pages of the agreement together.

 

Also to be enforceable they would have needed to sign and date the agreement.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't need to provide a credit limit as long as they put in a general statement like "we will from time to time determine your credit limit". They do however need to tie the two pages of the agreement together.

 

Also to be enforceable they would have needed to sign and date the agreement.

 

 

This is what i am trying to find out. They have not signed or dated the agreement element of the document they have rubber stamped the application.

 

I dont see why though this company should be allowed to enforce a debt when they have committed a criminal offence!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can somebody with any legal knowledge on the CCA 1974 have a look at my questions:-

 

 

Tesco have been in default and committed a criminal offence but now they have produced an application / agreement is this only enforcable by the court?

 

Should thier 'signature' or stamp be on the same page that refers to the agreement and signature of the debtor? (It is currently on the application page)

 

The charges are unlawfull so doesn't this automatically render the agreement unenforcable as under contract law for a contract to be legally binding the purpose of the agreement must not be illegal?

 

Is a application / agreement acceptable under the CCA 1974?

 

Does it make a difference that the detailed statement of account that was requested with the CCA was not supplied?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The charges were only unlawful if they were set at £20 AFTER the OFT decided they should be £12.

It is only enforceable on the order of the court, but I would think if all the required info is there, they would probably win.

 

Don't know about the rest sorry.

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The charges were only unlawful if they were set at £20 AFTER the OFT decided they should be £12.

It is only enforceable on the order of the court, but I would think if all the required info is there, they would probably win.

 

Don't know about the rest sorry.

 

Thank you....

 

But I tend to disagree with the charges bit..... The charges have always been unlawful if they were only unlawful after OFT stepped in then no-body will be able the 6 years worth of previous.

 

I have since found out that the creditors signature MUST be on the agreement document along with the signature of the debtor. The creditors stamp on my document is on the application and is only a received stamp therefore it is improperly executed.

 

They may win in court but not untill i put up a stinking fight has to how they have committed a criminal offence, withheld information, tried to enforce an improperly executed agreenment and applied unlawful charges

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the charges have always been unlawful if they were at £20 or £12 but that alone doesn't make the agreement illegal or unenforceable, thats what I was trying to say. You can still claim them back.

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the charges have always been unlawful if they were at £20 or £12 but that alone doesn't make the agreement illegal, thats what I was trying to say. You can still claim them back.

 

 

Getting a little too excited!! I have been informed the charges are not illegal, they are unlawful, which is a very significant difference. Also, the CCA overrides contract law.

 

The fact remains that they have not executed the agreement so therefore they need to explain how they complied with s63.

 

Also, they did not send me a copy of my cancellation rights, all they said was is that they would do so (which they haven't)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that, i was in fact trolling the pages of that thread but didn't quite get 300 odd, was getting a bit fidgety!

 

It looks like it is the same, out of a three page document the first is an application the last two are agreements. I realised it was probably enforecable when i saw it but i thought i'm buggered if i'm going to let this go without a fight considering it has taken them since April to provide it. I would love to hear them explain to the judge why it took them so long! ( can you have an application and agreement in the same document?)

 

what is bugging me is the fact that the charges in the agreement are unlawful so that should make the agreement unenforcable:? ( i refer back to my bit about contract law)

 

I will try my luck, i cant see what i got to lose, they have given me until the 8 August to respond...how nice of them

 

What avenue did you take after receiving yours?

 

Hiya :)

 

I'm about to send them an offer of monthy payment I think - it won't be much ££ per month, but it truly is all that I can afford at the moment. They're currently threatening to take me to court as I haven't paid anything for a while. I've been asking pretty much the same questions as you on the forum, but I've received conflicting info about whether or not it matters that they haven't signed the agreement (is it an agreement or an application form :confused: ). Though the majority of replies have said that it IS an agreement, and their sig wouldn't be needed for the courts to enforce it.

 

So, I'll await the replies to your questions with baited breath!! I really need to contact them in the next couple of days though.

 

Keep in touch with how you get on :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya :)

 

I'm about to send them an offer of monthy payment I think - it won't be much ££ per month, but it truly is all that I can afford at the moment. They're currently threatening to take me to court as I haven't paid anything for a while. I've been asking pretty much the same questions as you on the forum, but I've received conflicting info about whether or not it matters that they haven't signed the agreement (is it an agreement or an application form :confused: ). Though the majority of replies have said that it IS an agreement, and their sig wouldn't be needed for the courts to enforce it.

 

So, I'll await the replies to your questions with baited breath!! I really need to contact them in the next couple of days though.

 

Keep in touch with how you get on :)

 

Hold fire with that letter, it may have the prescribed terms but if it is not signed it is improperly executed.

 

Here is a quote from a knowledgeable source:-

 

There has been some debate as to whether an agreement that contains all of the prescribed terms and is signed by the debtor but NOT by the creditor comes within the category of agreements that might be enforced by a court under s127(3):

(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a) (signing of agreements) was not complied with _unless a document_ (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) _itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer_ (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

My opinion is that if the agreement has not been signed by the creditor then it has never been executed at all and as **** says, how can a creditor possibly have complied with s62 or 63?

Also, IMO the creditor is never going to be able to comply with an s77/78 request because the requirement is for a copy of the _executed_ agreement - so the debt will remain unenforceable.

I will PM you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hold fire with that letter, it may have the prescribed terms but if it is not signed it is improperly executed.

 

Here is a quote from a knowledgeable source:-

 

There has been some debate as to whether an agreement that contains all of the prescribed terms and is signed by the debtor but NOT by the creditor comes within the category of agreements that might be enforced by a court under s127(3):

 

(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a) (signing of agreements) was not complied with _unless a document_ (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) _itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer_ (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

 

My opinion is that if the agreement has not been signed by the creditor then it has never been executed at all and as **** says, how can a creditor possibly have complied with s62 or 63?

 

Also, IMO the creditor is never going to be able to comply with an s77/78 request because the requirement is for a copy of the _executed_ agreement - so the debt will remain unenforceable.

 

I will PM you

 

Fantastic - will wait to hear from you then :)

 

If I'm not quick to reply, it's cause of the kids :rolleyes: , but I'll get back to you asap!

 

Thanks for helping me :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then thye would be stuffed wouldn't they!:)

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations Boon72 on your first post, but why has it taken you 15 months?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - currently the Halifax have failed to provide me with the CCA requested by me in April, and have since written to me to tell me that they are not revoking the charges and interest they have added to my account during the period of their failure to provide this. They are insisting that monthy payments be made.

 

Can anyone highlight which part of legislation prohibits them from adding additional sums to my accounts during the period of their default?

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - currently the Halifax have failed to provide me with the CCA requested by me in April, and have since written to me to tell me that they are not revoking the charges and interest they have added to my account during the period of their failure to provide this. They are insisting that monthy payments be made.

 

Can anyone highlight which part of legislation prohibits them from adding additional sums to my accounts during the period of their default?

 

Send a 14 day LBA for refund of interest charges etc imposed during period of default. State that under cpr46.1 you are asking disclosure of agreement & that you will be making court to make a declaration as to the enforceability of agreement. Then 14 days later issue N1.

 

If they do produce a true copy of the executed agreement prior to court then just amend claim for interest charged .

 

If they are in default for that period they are not entitled to enforce the agreement.

 

Court action will kerp the account in dispute & should focus their mind

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

great idea Josie8 - may try that with MBNA

 

Section 78(6) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, states – (6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)— (a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and (b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

nearly forgot!

laughable reply back from MBNA regarding my ongoing CCA issue with them if anyone would care to comment

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mbna/81907-mbna-ding-ding-round-3.html#post984080

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3490 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...