Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Old bloke V The Woolwich urgent advice needed please


SPK
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6203 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I am helping a work colleague to claim money back from the Woolwich. We have succesfully claimed back from the Nationwide but this case is not as straight forward as that one was.

 

All the bank charges in total amount to £1278.00 without interest. He has paid some of this but not all of it. It was a case of him getting one or two charges then getting charges on top of charges that have made him overdrawn, then they have slapped the interest on top. Although he hasn't paid the full amount above in charges yet, only some of it his account is overdrawn and they are threatening court action against him to recover the monies. If I file moneyclaim...which is the stage we are at now can I list the full total of charges that they are trying to recover from him? Including the ones he hasn't paid them yet? I really hope this makes sense to somebody. Thanks for any help. Its quite urgent as we have to file the moneyclaim before they do basically..he has fourteen days!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SPK

 

I was waiting for one of the guru's to respond or at least someone who has experience of bank threats to take the customer to court.

 

So my limited advise it that since the account is currently in a state of deficit as a sole result of unlawful charges (ie say it originally started because he went £40 unauthorised O/D but has during the interim paid off at least that £40 leaving only accumulative charges as the reason for the debt being cleared), then your friend should write to the bank and state that the account is now in dispute.

 

I'll try and find one of the example letter on the site for this though hopefully someone will come along and put a link on this thread for you. My understanding is that when an account is declared as 'in dispute' the bank cannot refer it to a DCA or proceed with court action until the dispute is investigated.

 

In the meantime, go through the whole step by step of letter sending with Woolwich. Obviously if your friend has statments and therefore is in a position to send the prelim letter requesting return of xxx amount of charges plus related interest, that letter should go off straight away. (No 8% added at this stage).

 

I would personally send the dispute letter and the claim letter as separate pieces of correspondence simply to keep the claim unmuddied and free from any further delay attempts by the Woolwich.

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

My claim was for charges applied that I hadn't actually paid due to being in my overdraft. They threatened me with action to recover the overdraft and it got as far as DCA, when I informed them it was in dispute the DCA asked if Woolwich were aware of this... to which I replied it is going to court so I would think they would!

I never heard another word from the DCA!

 

But yes as the account is in dispute they shouldn't be refering it to a DCA. Just make it clear to them you are aware of this fact :)

24 hours in a day... 24 in a case... co-incidence???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi ya all, this case is still rumbling on!!!!

 

We need some urgent help as i have just got back from holiday and the old fella didnt want to bother me but has has the letter sitting at his home re Allocation Questionaire......

 

At the top right corner of the form it says " in the county court then underneath Claim Number.....

 

Underneath that it says Last date for filing with court office ! what date do i put in there ?

 

Really need help today as time is running out......

 

Thanks a million

 

SPK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

if i was you i would contact the court where the AQ came from as they are supposed to fill in the 'last date for filing with court office' section.

Are you sure its not written on an a letter that came with it?

claire

:pI'VE CLAIMED MY BARCLAYS CHARGES BACK.:p

£5125.60

Im no expert everything i write is what i learnt from my own experience and reading through other threads. Click my scales if you wish to!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...