Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Abbey sends letter to wrong person


mattydj
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6287 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently paid a cheque into my account which unfortunately bounced.

 

I only discovered this when I checked my balance online and noticed the amount had been credited and then taken back out of my account.

 

I rang the Abbey and they told me that the letter had gone astray but was coming back and would be sent on to me.

 

I received a letter this morning from a complete stranger who had been sent a letter, addressed to me, marked Private and Confidential.

 

Attached to this letter was the cheque, marked refer to drawer.

 

Now, not only has this complete stranger had sight of my name, address and bank account details, but also the name, address and bank account details of the person who's cheque had bounced.

 

I have written a very strongly worded complaint to the Abbey. Of course, I don't for one minute expect anything from them, but I have told them that if my or my friend's accounts have been compromised in any way, I shall hold Abbey responsible and shall expect full compensation and remuneration for any improper withdrawls.

 

I am now looking elsewhere for banking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Big Lash

Matty, this isn't a case of not hearing from Abbey, it should be a case of Abbey being worried about what you will do.

 

This is a major breach of the DPA, and Abbey are squarely at fault.

 

I don't know the proceedure off the top of my head, but Abbey have so long to investigate. If they ignore your letter, then your options are to contact the Financial Ombudsman to ask him to step in.

 

I am sure there are other organisations that you could involve, and I'm sure others will post their thoughts on the matter.

 

DO NOT let this go, Abbey have made a very serious error and need to make every effort to ensure you are satisfied with their investigation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A similar thing happened to me 2 years ago. My bank details were sent to the wrong address and I filed for compensation.

 

I wrote a letter complaining and asking for compensation quoting that I would take this complaint to the Financial Ombusman if I did not receive the proper compensation.

 

I held out for £500. The reason for this is that the Ombusman charges the Banks £500 for each complaint that they have to handle if it is found to be a fault by the bank - which in your case it clearly is.

 

They did try and get rid of me for £100 then increased to £180 but 2 weeks after that call I got a cheque in the post for £500.

 

They have clearly breached the DPA rules and therefore you are entitled to claim. Good Luck.

:p
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...