Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oh that is very helpful, thanks a million for answering my query. Looking at the license right now. At the front it says the issue date is 2022 (that's when I swapped it), but at the back it says 2015 next to Category B. So, I'm definately at 12 points, right?  
    • The two PDF documents that you posted earlier are unavailable. I don't know why but maybe they are corrupt. I have deleted them Please will you post up again. Also please can you post multiple PDF documents in a single file multipage format, correct order right way round et cetera. Thank you  
    • The New Drivers Act sees a driver's licence revoked if he accrues six points within two years of becoming a qualified driver. If you passed your test in an EU country, then that is the date you became a "qualified driver" for the purposes of that Act.  For drivers who became qualified more than two years previously, if they accrue twelve or more points within a three year period they face a mandatory six month disqualification unless they can persuade the court that they or others will face "exceptional hardship" if they are banned.  In both cases, the dates of the offences are used to calculate the relevant period.
    • I got my car driving license in 2015 from an EU country, then I moved in the UK and swapped it to a UK license 20 months ago. What does this mean for my points limit please? Is it 6 or 12 for me right now?  
    • Interesting polling on what voters who previously voted Tory are thinking. Conservative Defector Poll June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ron14673 vrs HBOS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5946 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Folks

 

Been on other sites not connected with recovery of charges. I have a question which you may be able to help with.

 

I have just received 6years statements from HBOS and calculated the amount of bank charges applied to my account. They are above the £5000 limit for County Court. My question is can I split them and make two claims to keep them within that limit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ron.

 

Yes.

But don't put both claims in at the same time because if seen together the courts will probably combine them. Wait until the first one is settled before claiming the second one.

 

For more information, spend a few days reading the FAQs and the step by step guide in the library section.

 

Good luck.

Regards, Rooster.

  • Haha 2

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

i've just done a search for you

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/search.php?searchid=645159

 

these threads will give you something to read:smile:

 

welcome along

 

dx100uk:grin:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes you can, however there is a theoretical risk of you being branded a vexatious litigant and your second or subsequent claims being struck out.

 

Mind you i haven't heard of any body suffering that fate so I'm sure its fine.

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks

 

One would suggest that to be branded a vexatuos litigate, you would have to make several unwarranted and false claims. As my claim or that of any person owed monies by any bank or building society which has levied unlawful and punative charges is fair and lawful then surely I or any other litigate can hardly be described thus.

 

Ron

Link to post
Share on other sites

One would suggest that to be branded a vexatuos litigate, you would have to make several unwarranted and false claims. As my claim or that of any person owed monies by any bank or building society which has levied unlawful and punative charges is fair and lawful then surely I or any other litigate can hardly be described thus.

 

Although to my knowledge, it hasn't yet happened in England, it has in Scotland

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/scotland/71013-urgent-attention-please-read.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks

 

One would suggest that to be branded a vexatious litigate, you would have to make several unwarranted and false claims. As my claim or that of any person owed monies by any bank or building society which has levied unlawful and punitive charges is fair and lawful then surely I or any other litigate can hardly be described thus.

 

Ron

 

 

As a claimant, in principle you are expected to bring a single claim to resolve any outstanding issues. If you bring one claim and then suffer further charges then this wouldn't be the same.

 

However, breaking a large claim down simply to keep it in small claims court does run this risk.

 

If you have £10ks worth of charges and break it into 2 x £5K lots the bank could have your second claim struck out on the basis of abuse of process and the fact you should have made a single claim.

 

Although in the Pearl book recommended by this site, it suggests something along the lines of keeping claims below the £5k threshold isn't grounds for being branded unreasonable, what she doesn't say is that you can split large claims into several lumps to achieve the same objective.

 

I haven't heard of anyone being put in this position, but it is a theoretical possibility.

 

Whether the defendant would ask you were put on the vexatious litigator register or not is of course open to debate, they could however ask for second and subsequent claims being struck out simply on abuse of process.

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks

 

If the charges are an on going problem and being punative in nature then surely applying for the return of other charges would not make us vexatious litgators as the banks continue to act in a vexatious manner themselves?

 

Ron

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a difference between splitting up a historical claim to bring it under £5K (could possibly lead to a claim that you're abusing the process) and starting a later claim based on new charges imposed after an older claim is in the system - the latter could not be questioned.

 

Have a good look at threads on larger claims. Although you're open to higher costs if you go to court and lose there is a possibility that you'll get an earlier full settlement because of the more rigorous disclosure process required for fast track claims. This disclosure process would force the bank into revealing the costs of its charges.

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

post No. 7

 

As a claimant, in principle you are expected to bring a single claim to resolve any outstanding issues. If you bring one claim and then suffer further charges then this wouldn't be the same.

 

As Advoc says

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My bank (Lloyds) has paid me £750 which is the amount I have claimed for.

But in the meantime they have charged me again over £500 on fees and overdraft charges.

What do I have to do? Do I start again?

Also they paid the money into the account and never offered me a cheque.

Any advice would be great.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please check this quote from Lloyds Bank:

 

This letter is the bank's final response, which means that if you remain dissatisfied you may refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. If you decide to pursue your complaint through the Financial Ombudsman Service you must do so within 6 months from the date of this letter. I have enclosed their leaflet that outlines how to contact them.

 

Is this a final offer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the letter actually offer you anything? If so how exactly was it termed - gesture of good will, offer of full and final settlement or something else? That's important to know as it dictates how you proceed.

 

If the letter didn't actually offer you anything it's not a final offer as such, it's a 'go away' letter. You do not have to refer anything to the financial ombudsment, you can take court action if what you've had back is not the full amount you're claiming.

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

it can only relate to the claim in hand.

 

if they continue to act unlawfully then you can claim, you cannot sign away your future rights to sue then and they know it.

 

glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is the full letter:

 

Thank you for getting in touch with us again. I am sorry you are still unhappy about your account charges.

 

We've already explained that we believe it is fair to charge you for extra services you've requested, as long as you know about the charges in advance. When you didn't have enough in your account to cover a payment you'd asked us to make, we had to agree to make it by setting up or increasing your overdraft, or tell you we couldn't agree it. We feel it's only fair to charge for our services in considering and implementing this.

 

It's easy to keep a running check on how much is in your account. You can get an up-to-date balance at any of our cash machines, over the phone, on line and by weekly text to your mobile.

 

If you know a payment is going to take you over the limit we've agreed, you're welcome to see if we can raise it - and we can usually give you an answer straight away. Again we can do that for you by phone, on line or at any of our branches. There's no charge at all for this.

 

Generally we don't agree to adjust any of these charges, but I can tell you that on this occasion we are prepared to reduce the charges by repaying you £720. In addition to this sum we have waived £30 of pending charges due on your account. You may have read that we and other banks are discussing overdraft charges with the Office of Fair Trading. Meanwhile we do consider each customer's position individually, and we are making you this offer as a gesture of goodwill because we might face that cost in dealing with your complaint if you took it any further.

 

I need to let you know that this does not mean we consider we have any legal obligation to do so. The sum of £720 will be credited to your account in the next few days.

 

As I've explained, these charges are avoidable and we would strongly urge you to keep within the limit you've agreed with us or to ask us now to see if we could increase it for you.

 

This letter is the bank's final response, which means that if you remain dissatisfied you may refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. If you decide to pursue your complaint through the Financial Ombudsman Service you must do so within 6 months from the date of this letter. I have enclosed their leaflet that outlines how to contact them.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Robert Cameron

Customer Services Officer

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Folks

 

I also got the eight week letter but still sent off the letter warning of court action against them. gave them 14 days to give me my money back. Letter delivered to branch by hand, will be on the steps of the court 9am 14 days from the letter.

 

I will not be bullied by some faceless clerk, who employs stalling tactics. Actually looking forward to setting the bailiffs on them and taking computers etc from their branches. That should be fun, but they will probably pay up as they do not want the bad publicity. hey that gives me an idea will take the local press with me, fun or what.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...