Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help Re: Scottish System


dollymop
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6257 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, this is my first post on the site and I am looking for some help and advice. I have read through quite a few of the threads on the Scottish procedure but I am still confused.

 

I am preparing a claim against RBS on behalf of my son. The amount is £1,760 plus interest at 8% £336.57 totalling £2096.57. I know the small claims court in Scotland only goes up to £750 and some people have suggested splitting the claim. My question is - does this mean sending an initial letter to the bank requesting £750 for a particular period, waiting for this to be concluded and then sending a further letter with another £750 claim and continuing until I reach the full total of £2096? Or do I send the initial letter to the bank asking for the £2096 but then submit £750 claims to the court if need be?

 

I hope that makes sense?

 

Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

Regards,

 

Dollymop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Dollymop.

 

Just send one letter for the full amount, then split your claims into one Summary Cause claim (£1,500) plus interest plus costs. and one Small Claim (£750) plus interest plus costs. With the Summary Cause claim after you hand your papers to the court, they will return them to you and you have to get a Sheriff's Officer to serve them on the Bank. This cost me £15.97. The court sends you a list of local Sheriff Officers you can use. Only do one claim at a time. Both claims are almost identical.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can use the English system but would need an address in england or a POBox no for correspondence.

Prelim Sent -27/02/07....

Response Letter rec'd -13/03/07....

LBA Sent -15/03/07...

Court claim due-30/03/07

Offer received(10p/cent short)-declined for full amount-28/03/07

Success FULL 6yr amount offered-29/03/07:D

........not yet received because they want me to accept conditions!!:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just thought I should give a quick update. I recalculated my sons charges and with interest the final claim was £3,300. The letter was duly sent off to RBS on 2nd March. Sixteen days later RBS replied stating that they did not accept the charges were illegal however, as a gesture of goodwill, they offered my son £2,800. He has accepted. It's amazing what one little letter can do!!

 

Regards,

 

Dollymop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Done Dollymop.

 

But I'ts still £500 short of what they were due you. I know £2,800. is a lot of dosh but if you had continued with your claim you would have got the lot. In saying that this way you have no more hasstle chasing the bank through the courts and if your son is happy with £2,800. then good luck to him. A lot of people in the same situation would have done exactly the same thing. I hope he gives you a bung !

 

Well done again.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

maroondevo52,

 

The money arrived from RBS this morning and believe it or not my son called me and offered to pay back the money he owes me!!!! Wonders will never cease!!

 

Regards,

 

dollymop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done, Dollymop, I knew you'd get something.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help required please!

 

I am at the stage of preparing court submissions. I have involved a solicitor and I am claiming £5040 plus interest..

My concern is that the particulars of the claim, refer to section 69 of the county courts act. I live in Scotland and I am pursuing the Bank of Scotland at their Rosyth address.

This is a business acount as a sole trader.

Are there any precedent's set?

I really want to nail the bugg***

Any advice would be extremely helpful.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...