Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wescot help!!


keith777
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6256 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you haven't already done so, stop paying them.

 

The (alledged) debt is now unenforceable until such time as they produce the agreement. After 30 days (I think) they have committed an offence, and even if they manage to produce the agreement, they cannot take any action without the courts permission.

 

Have a good read around the forum, lots of people are in the same boat as you with these waste of space ****, and by following their progress you'll have a much better idea of where to go next.

Nil Illigitimus Carborundum

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 working days (Mon-Fri) or 13 calendar days? Work it out from the date of receipt. You did send the letter recorded delivery and you have the chit and proof of delivery?

 

If they don't send the details within the time allowed by law they cannot proceed without a court order. To do that they must produce the documents required and persuade a judge they are legally entitled to chase you for the debt. If their failure to provide the documents continues for a calendar month beyond the 12 working days the deafult means a criminal offence has been committed and the likelihood of them going to court diminishes a great deal.

 

Until the time limits are up there isn't anything to do. Once time is up though report the company to the OFT. Don't expect them to do anything but an avalanche of complaints about the debt collecting industry may spur the paper pushers to do something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I sent Wescot a letter requesting copy of contract. [see my other post]

 

I received a reply today [9 working days]

 

The letter asked me to provide them with my date of birth and last 3 addresses.

 

Are they still obligated to provide me the copy of contract within 12 working days or has this letter they sent me ended the 12 days request?

They also sent me back the £1 postal order.

 

Are they obligated to send me the copy of the contract within 12 days as I have asked for it and not request further infromation from me?

 

I am slightly confused with the situation now

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

definetely delaying tactics. write back stating that the address they used to issue their claim to, was good enough for them so its good enough for you. your DOB should be on the requested documents, ask them to check :-)

 

they can do whatever they like with the money including set fire to it, the clock is still ticking (but I would send it back anyway)

 

write something like......

 

dear sirs

 

you have been in receipt of my request for information regarding my alleged debt since (date)

you have a statutory duty to supply the requested information within a specific timeframe.

 

I would suggest you read up on the Consumer Credit act 1974 especially sections 77 to 78 and 189

 

you have 12 working days to comply fully with my request after which the debt is unenforceable without a court order. After a further month you have commited an offence, and can be reported to the statutory bodies. your 12 days expired on (date) and your month expires on (date).

 

I would like you to know that as the proper documentation has not been produced you cannot action this alledged debt any further. Also if you have put any defaults against my name in relation to this debt, I require you to remove them IMMEDIATELY.

 

I await your response

 

etc

 

 

 

or a more formal template (borrowed)

 

I refer to my letters dated XXXXXXXX which was delivered via recorded delivery to your offices on XXXXXXXX, and my follow up letter dated XXXXXXXX.

 

In my letter xxxxxxI made a formal request for a copy of the signed, executed credit agreement for the above numbered XXXXXXXX account under section 77(1) and section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act. In addition a statement of my account should have been sent along with any other document mentioned in the credit agreement.

 

The Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for this request to be carried out before your company enter into a default situation. If the request is not satisfied after a further 30 calendar days, Your company commit an offence. These time limits expired on XXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXX respectively.

 

As you are no doubt aware subsection (6) states:

 

If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

 

(a) He is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

(b) If the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

Therefore as at XXXXXXXX this account became unenforceable at law and it is now my intention to refer this matter to the enforcement authorities.

 

Any default notices or adverse comments your company have recorded on my credit reference file should be immediately removed.

 

Failure to respond favourably to this letter within seven (7) days of receipt will result in immediate litigation being commenced against your company without further notice.

 

I await your rapid response.

 

 

either approach will do ...

 

rgds

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot for the replies

 

Just need to check before I reply back to them:

 

The alleged debt was from Hutchinson 3G - now on my other thread a forum member has advised that CCA doesn't apply to mobile phone operators - is this correct? and even if it was - how am I meant to know that Hutchinson 3G is a mobile phone operator?

 

Sorry to have 2 threads (I sort of hijacked this thread - apologies)

Original thread :

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/81496-wescot-some-advice-please.html

 

I'm trying to get a letter back out to Wescot as soon as possible

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear All

 

I am about to write and send a response back to Wescot today

 

Can someone clarify please that:

 

1. there would be no point me sending them the 'you are in breach of the CCA' letter because the debt concerns Hutchinson 3G and therefore a mobile contract.

 

2. I should instead send them a SAR with £10 postal order

 

3. re: breach of Data Protection Act - state they were in breach of DPA when they sent me a details of the account without first confirming the right recipient.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...