Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Castlebest Vs HSBC**WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6216 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

one and a half!!! one almighty row with a paul berry at leeds - trying to tell me that they don't pay by cheque lol.... told him to look into my account - he came back choking when he realised they'd already placed a 6 grand cheque my way lol. i'm expecting another cheque for £305 by next thursdays post at the latest. god help the poor boy if it''s not there hahhaaha

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thing is... i think the guys who answer the phones (not call centres in banglahore) actually DO know what's going on. i know a few peeps who work for them still, and they are claiming their own charges back lol.

hsbc as an employer are disgraceful to work for. and i'm speaking from experience on that one!

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I know about how they treat their employees as my wife used to work for them too. I am certain that most of the HSBC employees have some understanding of what is going on but it is tainted by propaganda from higher up. Hence why I was accused of stealing by one of the people in the call centre!!!!! :D

Guide to claiming back your bank charges

 

Most of your questions can be answered by following this link.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pete,

have you seen the thread by bookworm advising sending the draft direction anyway. on my maybe no aq thread - giveme..has put it in a format - see what you think - do you think it needs anything more at top or bottom or a cover note - need someone with more experience looking at court stuff than i have. maybe ok as it is. check it please?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the Easter Bunny has been to my house a day early and dropped a full offer through my door which has surprised me a little, no haggling just here’s all your money now go away and don’t tell anyone we did this as if I would tell anyone .

Needless to say I’ve crossed this bit out and the letter accepting the offer will be in tonight’s post back to them together with my preliminary letter for the charges they have deducted since the 7rh March.

So that’s how easy it is, do the figures, stick to the plan and get your money back.

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

i can't believe that! you sure it isn't a late april fool's joke?

that was way too easy - not even defended yet is it?

and it's everything - court filing, interest, the lot?

i'm staggered!

 

make sure the acceptance doesn't preclude you from any other claims - just within no more for those particular charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

[

oops too late, I filed my claim, my money will be out of your pocket and back in my pocket by the 10th of April (give or take a few days) let me know your findings then.

 

pete

 

from your lips to god's ears - apparently!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep every penny, they were due to defend on the 10th so maybe they have realised they are just wasting their own money once the claim has been filed with the court, then again the backlog must be huge and growing, maybe they are a bit worried with that amount of claims they will start to drop the ball and run the costs up even more.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic news Pete really pleased for you go buy some chocolate to celebrate!!!

 

:D :D :D

 

Not sure I would send the second prelim with the acceptance though you don't wanna give them a reason to delay things further. :)

Guide to claiming back your bank charges

 

Most of your questions can be answered by following this link.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how about a nicely worded letter indicating they could save themselves a lot of bother if they would include xxxx - (with a little mini breakdown of course) in with the money -

doesn't hurt to ask - i don't think it would delay things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok how does this look;

 

xxxxxxxxxx –v- HSBC Bank plc

Claim No: xxxxxxxxxxxx

Date Issued: xxxxxxxxxx

Your Ref: xxxxxxxxxxx

 

I acknowledge receipt of your letter dated xx/xx/xx detailing your settlement offer of £xxxx.xx. This offer appears to be the full amount of my claim as submitted to the MCOL system at Northampton county court on the xx/xx/xx, unfortunately it does not take into consideration the additional interest due at £0.xx per day that was detailed in my claim particulars.

 

Assuming the money could be paid into my account by the xx/xx/xx this would increase the value by xx days x £ 0.xx per day = £ xx.xx a total value of £ xxxx.xx

 

I would be willing to accept this above noted value as full and final settlement only for this claim of bank charges made on my account number xxxxxxxx in the period xx/xx/xx to xx/xx/xx. I would further agree not to make any other claims relating to these charges but feel I must reserve the right in relation to any further issues that may arise associated with my account and to make any further claims necessary to gain recompense for actions of your client that may be considered unlawful under common law or in violation of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 or Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.

 

I will be willing to withdraw my claim upon receipt of unconditional full settlement of this claim. The settlement monies should be deposited in my account number xxxxxxx. Failure to adhere to these conditions would result in me continuing my claim with the county court.

 

I am also not prepared to agree to any confidentially clauses you try to impose, unless of course your client wishes to make an offer of due consideration in addition to the amount of £xxx.xx, in order to be afforded this privilege by me.

 

I trust that you will find these arrangements will prove acceptable.

 

 

Yours sincerely,

Maybe petty but the interest since I filed is a tank of petrol

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...