Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Introducing myself


j1mmyd
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6600 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks,

 

I'm J1mmy .... and I haven't had a drink for .... sorry - wrong place.

 

I'm probably in the same position as many of you here. In my case, a business that didn't do as well as expected put me in what's best described as a poor fiscal position. I've spent the last two years working hard to repay debts incurred by that business. Unfortunately, it seems that the HSBC works hard to prevent that - currently penalty charges are being levied against my account at a rate of £350 a month. A lot of money for an £84 overdraft ... especially as I have only once had a phone call returned from the branch. (To tell me that it wasn't the policy of the HSBC to issue branch telephone numbers).

 

Well, after cajoling, writing, telephoning and begging I've finally resorted to a threat of action and found this place today which appears to have some very solid advice.

 

Over the last 6 years the HSBC has taken in excess of £6000 from my account by way of penalty charges despite my not even being able to get my bank manager to return a phone call for the last 3 years.

 

Strangely, an hour after faxing (copy by post) the 7 day letter my manager telephoned me. I at least had the satisfaction of explaining to her that the main reason for the threatened action was her inability to return a telephone call or letter. She made no offers, nor could she manage to defend her constant inaction. She did state that it was 'Bank policy' to impose these charges to which I responded that it was that very policy I was willing to have questioned in court. The manager (that really is quite a laughable title for someone who seems incapable of managing to dial a telephone number) informed me that any credits were beyond her ability to authorise, but she would have the appropriate department contact me.

 

Thus far, I have had no further contact from the HSBC.

 

Tomorrow, in the absence of any contact from them, we will initiate the claim.

 

Any words of wisdom, advice or general cheerng from the sidelines will be appreciated.

 

JD.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Three things are certain in life:

 

1. Death.

2. Taxes.

3. If a bank says they will phone you back, you will never hear from them again.

 

 

Send the letter before action if you know how much they owe you (make sure it's the business version, NOT the personal one - the personal one mentions the Consumer Credit Regs, not applicable in your case).

 

If you don't know, then send the DPA request letter - they HAVE to tell you how much they have taken from you.

 

Welcome, by the way. Have a read around, the rules, faqs etc... and get to know the terminology. It helps, and it helps the bank to understand that you mean what you say.

 

Have you another account ready in the event that they get shirty and close yours?

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Dave.

 

Just to clarify - these are charges against a personal account. The original debt problems coming from me trying to prop up the business.

 

I don't have another account ready to be used, but I can always draw down cash rather than have salaries paid into the bank.

 

As for them getting shirty, that's fine by me. It rather gives you licence to get down and dirty yourself, right?

 

;)

 

(BTW, you'll get used to my humour).

 

I'm an engineer but trained as a solicitor ... let them get mean ... I haven't put the claim in yet and I'm willing to let them off with interest in return for a quick settlement. If they do get mean, or refuse to talk to me then the claim goes in with full interest. In addition, I'll move the other (good) accounts I have with them.

 

What is truly stupefying is the 'head in the sand' mentality of what seems to be the entire staff of the bank. But hey - preaching to the converted, I'm sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do they take £350 amonth in charges? I thought they had a maximum monthly charge of £100?

 

James

Round 1: HSBC Current account - £1050 of unlawful charges refunded before even filing my claim! (August 2006)

Round 2: HSBC Current account (again!) - £275 refunded after preliminary letter! (June 2007)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever their claimed maximum ... the last two months have cost me £700 plus interest.

 

::insert the expletive of your choice here::

 

Don't worry ... it's coming back. I've also been in touch with a nice friendly journo who's pitched the The Gruniad and the BeeB. Charges for a service are one thing. What this bank is doing to me is something else.

 

It's an old saying that a bank is someone who will lend you an umbrella when the sun is out and ask for it back when it's raining. The HSBC don't do that - they turn on a firehose (copyright Soundbites'R'Us).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know of any limits with the banks I have banked with regarding charges - apart from the sky.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just really using this as an aide memoire, but it might also give some of you a wry smile.

 

I arrived home at around 7.15 and, before I'd got into the kitchen, my mobile rang. It was a member of staff from the HSBC call centre who failed to give her name (I really must start making notes and taking FULL names!).

 

So, the conversation went along these lines:

 

::security questions and confirmation::

 

HSBC: your direct debit for your loan repayment has been declined. Would you like to give me a credit or debit card payment now?

 

Me: No, I can't give you a payment now. I am currently in dispute with the HSBC and I am waiting a response to get that dispute resolved.

 

HSBC: If you don't make a payment then there will be additional charges for non-payment levied against your account.

 

Me: My dispute is regarding the level of charges that are already being levied against that account.

 

HSBC: But you are £115.XX overdrawn.

 

Me: I understand, and the HSBC has levied in excess of £2000 worth of charges against my account in the last year. If you would like to credit my charges back to the account I will be happy to pay you. I actually hoped when you said you were from the HSBC that you had called to discuss my letter before action that was sent last week.

 

HSBC: I'm not prepared to discuss charges.

 

Me: Well, if you're not prepared to discuss the issue in hand then there really is very little for us to talk about.

 

HSBC: Would you like me to cancel the direct debits on your account?

 

Me: No. I would like my bank manager or an appropriate person to discuss this matter with me. Are you an 'appropriate person'?

 

HSBC: I am not prepared to discuss charges. I can cancel the direct debits on your account or you will incur further charges.

 

Me: I do not want you to cancel the direct debits on my account. I would like you to honour the direct debits. I would like you to return the charges that have been levied but, as you've said, you're not prepared to discuss charges.

 

HSBC: ::confirms telephone contact details for me::

 

END

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Welcome to the forum!!

 

2. If you are claiming back £6000 or more, you may actually be in a position to set a legal precedent with your case... as you fall outside the remit of the Small Claims track. I wish you well!!! :)

 

3. A stranger called you up, claiming to be a bank employee and asked for your security details for your bank account. You replied with your security details. Do the math. (Ever heard of phishing emails? Meet their brother).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Proper told off for posting in the wrong place!!!

 

So, here's what I put on the other posting:

 

Hi, folks.

 

Having sent an LBA, I today received a pretty standard 'looking into the matters you have raised' letter from one of the bank's senior service quality officers.

 

Now, unfortunately, I haven't got all the firgures together yet in order to issue the claim, but expect to find time to do that over the next few days. For that reason, and also because I would love to see what response I get, I have just drafted the letter below:

 

Dear Ms. Sunderland

 

Ref: xxxxxxxxxxx

 

Thank you for your acknowledgement dated 12th instant.

 

As previously stated, I am looking to recover the penalty charges levied against my account. The time period stated in the letter before action that was sent has now expired.

 

However, in the interests of time and costs I am prepared to add another 7 days to that period prior to commencing proceedings.

 

If, within those 7 days, you can supply me with the cost element of the penalty charges levied then I am willing to accept the balance in full and final settlement as established by precedent.

 

In the absence of such a letter within that period, then an action will be commenced without further recourse to yourselves.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

My question(s):

 

has anyone ever managed to get a costing element out of the HSBC (or any other bank?)

 

has anyone tried this approach before?

 

has anyone any comments on this approach?

 

Many thanks for taking the time to read and, hopefully, respond.

 

(And thank you Lou for your reply to the other thread)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My question(s):

 

has anyone ever managed to get a costing element out of the HSBC (or any other bank?)

 

has anyone tried this approach before?

 

has anyone any comments on this approach?

1: I asked them, but they wouldn't take the bait

2: As 1:

3: As BW and Dave say, you will be wasting time trying.

 

Your best bet is to stick to the timetable that everyone else is following. Ignore everything the bank says to you, unless it is an offer to settle. Depending on the level of the offer you can either accept as part settlement or reject it out of hand.

 

HSBC will do everything they can to throw you off track - DON'T let them.

 

Good luck.

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 10 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6600 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...