Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • To be fair ,  she has responded and said she's on holiday but returns Sunday and will bank transfer when she returns and i think i believe her.
    • Checking hi-tech with low tech - Wales leading the way Growing Mid Wales, an organisation set up to bring together the private and public sectors alongside the Welsh Government, has launched a mobile mapping project to track areas of poor mobile phone signal Powys and Ceredigion. They will be using bin lorries which have signal detection equipment installed, and thus able to create a comprehensive map of mobile 'not-spots' in the area, since those vehicles will be visiting just about every property in the area on their usual rounds. Just a moment... WWW.THINKBROADBAND.COM  
    • Hi there   thank you for the reply. No, it's not a silly question at all. I am convinced I didn't hit anything with my car. I was going very slowly and it was the guy standing next to his lorry in the road who punched and kicked my car as I went by. It's cause I saw him do it in the mirror.  I initially thought he did it because he thought I was passing him maybe too closely whilst he was messing around with his lorry ?  That's why I stopped and got out and asked what he thought he was doing hitting my car. He then just hurled abuse at me. Not making any accusations such 'you hit me' 'you hit my lorry' or you did this or that. He just swore and shouted at me. At which point I said I would be making a complaint to his company for his threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I went to my car , got my phone to take a photo of his number plate but then he came towards me again and I thought if he now hits me I am going to come second. I am a woman in her mid 50s travelling on her own and this guy looked like a Millwall football supporter (short, rotund, skin head) so I decided to leave this situation. I got back in my car closed the door and drove off before he could reach me.  I later checked my phone and noticed the photo was too blurred, as I turned and rushed back to my car too quickly before the camera could focus. So I thought it was pointless making a complaint as the guy couldn't be traced anyway, so I forgot all about it until yesterday. But this is all I can think of, it must have to do with this incident as it is in the same street.   
    • Please read the following thread very carefully. It is extremely relevant where you are suing Evri on the basis of a contract which you originally made with Packlink who are domiciled in Spain. A judgement has been obtained and we have applied for transcript and it will be put up on this thread as soon as we receive it probably about the end of July. In the meanwhile, read this thread, see what has been discovered about the Packlink/Evri/customer relationship and look at the witness statement very carefully. It's a long thread but don't give up. Once you have the transcript of the judgement, then I will do a more careful and explanatory post here   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/459707-evri-lost-my-ebay-parcel-£844-court-claim-issued-judgment/
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

UKPC parking invoice - tesco Faraday retail park,Coatbank Street, Coatbridge. ML5 3SQ scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4816 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi all,

 

I think Im on my 4th letter? I received a letter from Graham White solicitors, from a Micheal Sobell.

 

It goes on to say I havent paid a parking fine after being written to from UKPC and Roxburge. It says this is the letter before legal proceedings are issued in the county court.

 

The costs have now rissen as follows:

 

Claim issue fee: £30.00

Solicitors cost for issuing fee: £50.00

Judgement costs: £25.00

Warrent issue fee: £35.00

Solicitors cost for issuing warrent: £2.25

 

Total: £142.25

 

Then I am threatend with baliffs at the end.

 

So now I would just like some reassurence to carry this on, well I'll have to ignore now the cost is rising lol :D

 

Am I near the end? :???:

 

P.s I have ignored and filed every letter I have received. I have made no attempts to contact them by letter or phone.

 

I have received the same letter 2 days ago, it says i have 7 days to respond. well lets see what they do after 7 days. i too have not responded to any of these stupid letters.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

First of all, I'd just like to say thanks to everyone who's posted information on this site. My 'offence' with UKPC happened at Merry Hill on 29th November last year and, after it had happened, I was pretty cross about it and took loads of photos with my phone ready to lodge my appeal as to why I shouldn't pay. Then I found this forum and realised that I shouldn't contact them, I've now had 6 letters from them, the last being a notice of visit (sorry, I must type these things correctly - a NOTICE OF VISIT) letter from Rossendales on 24th Feb but nothing since - all I can assume is that they're having trouble finding my house. Perhaps it's finally come to an end - and I didn't even get a Graham White letter...

 

Anyway, the reason why I'm posting, apart from to say thank you to everyone for their stories, is to make a comment about anyone posting a message saying 'we must stop this', 'isn't this illegal' or 'how dare the DVLA give out my details'. I don't want companies like UKPC to stop operating in this manner. If they are stopped by law, all they'll do is resort to clamping or some other nasty way of getting your money off you.

 

OK, I was very frustrated when I saw the ticket on my car but I'm not going to blindly send someone a cheque for £35, £70, £115 or any such amount without a damn good reason. When I got home I Googled 'UKPC' and this forum was 1st on the list (it's slipped down to 2nd now - UKPC's web site has overtaken them all), followed by Money Saving Expert and Pepipoo - and they all said the same thing; ignore it. How much hassle was that? Very little. And after a bit of further reading when each of my letters arrived, I knew other had people had gone through what was happening to me and was confident that I could ignore them and it looks like I've come out the other end now. Again, very little hassle for me.

 

If people are stupid enough to just send a cheque off to these [problematic] without investigating it then it's their money they're losing. While it's still profitable for UKPC to operate in this way, I say let them do it. Like everyone else reading this forum, we've got the brains to investigate this and realise that we can just ignore it. It's a lot more difficult to ignore when there's a wheel clamp on your car and a hell of a lot more difficult to come out the other end of things without having to pay a penny.

Edited by cardboardman
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it's a case of 'people being stupid' - they're more likely easily intimidated, and dislike being confrontational. This is to their detriment, and perhaps the much-maligned 'ostrich' approach (putting your head in the sand) is the CORRECT approach for these communications!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cardman

If the last letter you had was a Notice of Visit from Rossendales you've got at least another couple of letters to come. I had mine mid January and since then have had two letters from Credit Security Limited.

The first one DEMANDED IMMDIATE payment followed two weeks later by "legal documents are being prepared"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cardman

If the last letter you had was a Notice of Visit from Rossendales you've got at least another couple of letters to come. I had mine mid January and since then have had two letters from Credit Security Limited.

The first one DEMANDED IMMDIATE payment followed two weeks later by "legal documents are being prepared"

 

Very true. After the 'legal documents are being prepared' letter then theres the 'final, final, final' letter which gives you the chance to settle at a lesser sum before action!:roll: Thats the 'were getting desperate now and really want your money' letter!!! They usually disappear then :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, I have been following the advice given on the forum after having the same issues with UKPC as the rest on here.

I have now received a letter from Credit security Limited for a demand of £125.The day after i received the letter i got a phone call from a debt collection agency who would not disclose there name. I managed to get the phone number and called it back but surprise surprise the office was shut. Ant advice would be greatly appreciated

Thanks in advance:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just before you hang up - press the recall [R] button on your phone. This effectively places the call on hold at the exhange, and sounds much more efficient that just hanging up by slamming the handset down!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just before you hang up - press the recall [R] button on your phone. This effectively places the call on hold at the exhange, and sounds much more efficient that just hanging up by slamming the handset down!

 

:p:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey everyone,

I'm new to the forum and found you on google, i thought i'd put a post on here rather than starting a new thread. I've been reading this thread for about an hour now.

 

Basically my story is that i parked in a local tesco's car park, and had to park with my car over the white lines as the car next to me was too close. When i returned i had a notification on my window saying i will receive a charge letter through the post.

Having read a lot of pages of this thread i really only have one thing to ask. . . .

 

Should i follow the advise early on in the thread and correspond with UKPC and the resulting debt collection companies as outlined in the templates on here, or should i just completely ignore all letters sent to me as some people have adivsed?

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated, i'm pretty nervous but i'm determined not to let them rob me of my money.

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mate,

 

I had the same thing apart from i purposely parked on the white hatchings in sainsbusys cause it was raining and couldnt be bothered to find a space lol.

 

Basically just follow the advise on here with the standard letter templates about what to say when you dispute the ticket. In this case i wrote one letter and never heard anything back, in other cases I had to write a few times but if you read the advise they are p*ss easy to get out off once you know how.

 

(Oh and by the way when i say I, i mean someone else who was driving my car at the time who i lent the car to on that day) :rolleyes:

 

 

 

Hey everyone,

I'm new to the forum and found you on google, i thought i'd put a post on here rather than starting a new thread. I've been reading this thread for about an hour now.

 

Basically my story is that i parked in a local tesco's car park, and had to park with my car over the white lines as the car next to me was too close. When i returned i had a notification on my window saying i will receive a charge letter through the post.

Having read a lot of pages of this thread i really only have one thing to ask. . . .

 

Should i follow the advise early on in the thread and correspond with UKPC and the resulting debt collection companies as outlined in the templates on here, or should i just completely ignore all letters sent to me as some people have adivsed?

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated, i'm pretty nervous but i'm determined not to let them rob me of my money.

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally i would reply using the standard replys that are detailed in this threat and other replies. At least then if they threaten to take you to court you have clearly tried to sort out the matter.

 

If i had more time i would point you to the right place for the standard letters but its just a case of reading this post from the start. Thats what i did, may take you an hour but will save you £80 or whatever the fine is.

 

 

Hey guys thanks for the really speedy replies!

 

So basically i should just ignore every letter they send to me no matter how threatening it is and not bother corresponding with them at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi to a fellow Hull Lad, thanks for e-mail, as suggested by the others just ignore all, you can of course reply to thier mail but as in my case they take not the slightest bit of notice of what you have said, I would even think if you had died on the spot they would still slap a ticket on you. Re mine I recived all the usual threats of the sky will fall in on you etc, the letters have now stopped, because they have no redress to get monies off anyone, stick it out and have a good laugh :grin: at the wording in thier letters. all the best don't use TESCO's anymore and power to the people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The most successful course of action now seems to be to completely ignore the PPC. They don't take a blind bit of notice of anything you write to them and by writing you are only confirming they have found a point of contact and are getting to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems UKPC/Rossendales are getting more desperate these days.

My Mrs got a phone call from Rossendales the other day, a few weeks after a 'notice of visit'. Not unusual you may think, but as I posted previously, we aren't in the phone book or on any database like 192.com due to carefully ticked privacy boxes etc. So I suspect this means they must have phoned BT or similar and PAID for the number (we aren't ex-directory).

Luckily she has experience of awkward buggers on phones.

They asked her to confirm who she was as they wanted proof she was who they wanted to speak to, she said 'I don't know who you are either! Take me to court'. She then left them on hold for 5 minutes listening to Radio1:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

 

This is a great forum. My partner has been issues with an Enforcement Notice from UKPC through the post (there was no ticket left on the vehicle)

 

The vehicle in question was parked outside Aldi Hatfield.

 

I have a few questions I hope someone can answer:

 

1) Can a private company like UKPC access DVLA Records and issue penalty notices through the post without fixing the notice to the vehicle?

 

2) As my partner was not the driver of the vehicle, but is the Registered Keeper, could ignoring/contesting this fine appear negative on her personal credit report?

 

3) The alleged offence shows a photograph of the rear of the car - not evidence of what that the contavention was (the contravention is listed as "Unauthorised Parking; Other Contravention"). Also, there is no date/time stamp on the photograph, but there is a time mentions on the Charge Certificate.

 

I hate companies who do this, its complete scare mungering. As the vehicle was cleaned later that day and the ticket dumped, when we received the Penalty Notice from UKPC, we have not evidence that we legally parked; but we do have evidence that we were in Aldi where we spent £110 !!

 

Its things like this that would drive me away from going there again, and the companies that do suffer are people like Aldi.

 

Billybong

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) DVLA makes millions every year selling Registered Keeper details

2) Correct - just ignore UKPC

3) photograph is meaningless rubbish.

 

 

If they have sent a 'Charge Certficate' they are probably mimicking real council paperwork. That would be in violation of the 2008 Consumer Regulations and possible the Fraud Act 2006. report them to Trading Standards.

 

Ignore the PPC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4816 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...