Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claim advice


Dav3y
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6567 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

Just like to say what an excellent and helpfull site this is.

 

I'm about to start my claim against MBNA for 3 different cards, and I'm after a bit of advice. I have two cards still with open accounts on them which they refused to close as they obviously had balances on them that consist only of late fees. I also have furthur charges I'm claiming back over the past 6 years that i have paid.

 

Now as they refuse to close the accounts, should i just group the paid and unpaid charges together and claim for the lot and then pay off the balances from the refunds if/when i get them or should i pay the balances off before filling in the form on the moneyclaim website. Doesn't really bother me either way, but the only benefit is it would stop them adding furthur charges, and take away a possible reason for a defence. I guess the other option is to seperate the paid and unpaid charges on the claim and state that the unpaid charges are being claimed because the bank refuses to close the accounts unless these balances are paid off even though i dispute them.

 

Any advice would be greatly apreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you already gone through the DPA letter, preliminary request and letter before action routine? These should all be done before the moneyclaim I believe.

 

Re paying off the debt: have you requested they put a hold on the account rather than closure and ask for no further charges to be made? You'll only incur interest then which may be reclaimable. Obviously if you have the funds you could pay it off and reclaim all the charges and pay no further interest.

 

There's nothing to stop you making a second claim once the first is refunded and you're in a better financial position. They may backdown with a simple phonecall on the second.

 

Good luck.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

DPA wasn't needed as i am a hoarder and have all my old statements,and yes have already been through the Request for Repayment and LBA letters. I have had about 3 letters saying i will get a response by x/y/z followed by another one and the same again. Finally gave in and rung them up and they told me i would have a letter by Wednesday of last week. Needless to say it didn't turn up and I'm fed up with their lies and stalling tactics, and the deadlines i gave them have now passed so I'm moving on.

 

They haven't frozen the accounts either, they continue to add £25/month charges to both accounts and I'm surprised they would even do that as they know full well they are in dispute.

 

 

Not going through the aggro of seperate claims and all that business, I just want this settled now as they are in the third month of threatening with defaults if i don't pay what i don't owe them.

 

Have balances of £317 and £165 on the two open acounts, and the total charges (paid and unpaid) excluding interest is £777.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had another look at the charges this morning, and have decided I'll probably go for paid charges plus interest, and then add on the two current balances as i don't owe them. This will add up to £350 + £100 interest at 8% and then additional £480 on the balances. Once the £80 costs is added as well this brings the total claim to just over £1000.

 

I heard that if i get an offer i should accept this if it's the full amount less the interest.

 

Wish me luck......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had another look at the charges this morning, and have decided I'll probably go for paid charges plus interest, and then add on the two current balances as i don't owe them. This will add up to £350 + £100 interest at 8% and then additional £480 on the balances. Once the £80 costs is added as well this brings the total claim to just over £1000.

 

I heard that if i get an offer i should accept this if it's the full amount less the interest.

 

Wish me luck......

If your balances are made up of charges you shouldn't add the balances to the charges as you are effectively claiming twice.

 

The interest they charged you, or a part of it may be reclaimable. The 8% on top of it all is only claimable when you go to court.

 

Good luck.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not adding the balances to the charges. The balances are unpaid charges added since they refused my request to close accounts some 12 months ago and only consist of charges added since May 05. The charges are charges paid prior to May 05 of which I am claiming the 8% on the moneyclaim site.

 

Effectively any settlement paid out will pay off the balances unless they offer to clear the balances and close the accounts and repay just the paid charges plus court costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, maybe I'm not making myself clear. I would have thought a list of all charges would include the ones that make up the overdrawn balance.

 

I think a complete list of charges, rather than half a list of charges and the balance of the claim made up of overdrawn balances would be better, as it doesn't matter wether you've paid them or not. The complete list of charges is what they've charged you and that's what you claim should be made up of.

 

I hope this helps.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

They could do, but the unpaid charges have a higher rate of interest applied than i can claim back via court so thought it would be more beneficial to me if i did it that way especially as the bank themselves are responsible for the interest being added in the first place. Grouping it all as charges and then claiming 8% makes me around £40 worse off, and i don't see why i should pay interest on money i never owed.

 

I'm so enraged at the way that they have behaved and blatently ignored all of my recent communications that i don't see why i should let them get away with anything if i don't have to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should claim for all charges (paid or unpaid) and any interest that have been applied to those charges if you can calculate that. It seems you may be able to do this. The 8% is on top of all of this.

 

Claiming for the interest back that they charged you has been highly debated on this site and very much relates to personal circumstances. If your only debt is charges then clearly the interest is on those charges and you can claim for the interest they charged you.

 

Let me know if we're getting any clearer. I'd really like to help sort this with you.

 

My concern is the statement that you are requesting a refund of your overdraft, when you should be asking for a refund of what that overdraft is made up of.

 

Am I helping?

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol, i think you just confused me furthur :)

 

The bottom line is I am claiming back all charges paid and unpaid + interest on the paid charges + costs and any additional interest they have added on top of the unpaid charges. I guess i made it sound more complicated than it is.

 

Having now looked at the limited space on the web based form, i made the claim much simpler using that form anyway as that's all it allows.

 

Ill go post the details now with my claim number if i can find the section, and thanks for your help ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 09 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6567 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...