Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

someone please help! This is getting out of hand!


Pimp Cat
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6354 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Morning all,

 

I am having some trouble with Allied International Credit.

 

I sent them my CCA request back in october and didn't hear anything back other then a phone call to tell me that they wouldn't be be complying with my request. I tried pointing out that by law that had to send me the information i had requested but they were having none of it. although they did stop phoneing me.

That is untill 6 days ago when a woman from AIC called me wanting to discuss my "account" I told her to refer to the letters that i had sent requesting that all comunication be in writing and that as they had failed to comply with my CCA request the debt was no longer enforcible, I also told her that i wouldn't disscuss anything over the phone, to which she said that her company had no reason to comply with either of my requests and demanded that we continue to talk over the phone. I told her that i wouldn't and hung up.

 

The next day i sent her the following letter.

 

Dear Mrs. XXXXXX

As I tried to explain to you yesterday, I wrote to your company on October 19th via recorded delivery, which was delivered on the 20/10/2006, requesting a true copy of the signed agreement, a statement of account and a true copy of the deed of assignment. All of which I am entitled to under the terms of sec’s. 77(1) and 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act (CCA) 1974, I also enclosed the statutory maximum fee of £1 in the form of a postal order.

 

To this date I have not been provided with a signed agreement under the consumer credit act, I have not been provided with a statement of account, and I have not been provided with a true copy of the deed of assignment, within the required time frame, despite my properly formatted and paid for request. I haven’t even had a reply to the above mentioned letter.

 

I therefore do not acknowledge any “debt” to Allied International Credit and I will not be making any payment against this "debt" as it is now unenforceable. I would also like to remind you that failure to comply with a CCA request is a criminal offence under the terms of the Consumer Credit Act, which I will be reporting to appropriate authorities, including but not limited to the Office of Fair Trading, Trading Standards and the Financial Ombudsman. Also non compliance with the original request is therefore a complete defense to any court claim that is issued.

 

I will be reviewing my credit reports supplied by Experian and Equifax very shortly. If it appears that your company have added a default against my credit record, Please note that I have not had a Notice of a Default served on me, as required by the conditions of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

If I find this to be the case I will be in contact with you again to request that you instruct Equifax plc, Experian Ltd or any other credit reporting company for a complete removal of all data pertaining to your records on me, to the extent that no data entry in relation to Allied International Credit will exist on my credit files.

 

I will give you seven days from the date of that letter to comply; otherwise I shall have no alternative but to refer the matter to the Court to seek an Order to that effect.

Should it be necessary to refer the matter to the Court, then I shall also apply for Court fees and legal costs against Allied International Credit. I shall also reserve the right to seek redress for damages as per the remit of the Data Protection Act.

 

I will also have no option but to report your breaches to the relevant statutory authorities, including but not limited to Trading Standards, The Office of Fair Trading, The Information Commissioners Office, The Financial Ombudsman and The Financial Services Authority.

I would also like to point out my request from my last letter that all communication from Allied International Credit be in writing. As you have failed to comply with this request, by insisting on contacting me by phone both at work, and at home on the 9th November 2006 and again on the 3rd of January 2007.

I demand that the phone calls stop immediately. I have enquired about the legalities of your actions, which can and will be classed at harassment under the terms of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act, Protection from Harassment Act 1970, Article 8 of the Human Right Act 1990 and the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949.

I will be reporting these breaches to the relevant statutory authorities, including but not limited to Trading Standards, The Office of Fair Trading, The Information Commissioners Office, The Financial Ombudsman and The Financial Services Authority.

I would be obliged if you could confirm in writing! what action you propose to take in respect of this matter.

Yours faithfully

 

That letter was sent friday so it would have been there on monday morning, you can imagine my suprise when i got a phone call from her last night still wanting to disscuss things over the phone! I told her that i wouldn't and told her to re-read my last letter and hung up. She promptly phoned me back! and started trying to talk to me again. i repeated my self saying that i would not talk over the phone and only in wrighting! the third time she phoned me back she told me that as i was being uncooprative she was moving my account to the next action! whe i asked what that meant she hung up!

 

Now my question is! Should i be worried about people turning up on my door demanding money? even though the debt in now unenforcible! how can i get them to realise that they are now in the wrong and that they will not get any money from me? what should my next steps be?

 

Sorry its a bit long and Thanks for any advice or pointers in advance.

 

Cheers.

 

Colin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found that when I write "all telephone calls are recorded for accuracy" at the bottom of my letters the calls stop immediately. So I would write and tell them that you record all your calls and since they have defaulted and may now have commited a criminal offence, and are still trying to enforce an unenforceable debt, you will be using your record of calls as evidence and you are passing it on to Trading Standards. Then get Skype or some other such thing (which some i believe you can download for free) and do so. In the meantime formally complain to TS, when they get involved the dca will back off

Link to post
Share on other sites

Colin,

 

If AIC do send an agent to "discuss" the account with you or to ask payment you can tell them that you'll only deal with it in writing and slam the door in their face. These agents are pure and simple debt collector and they have no right of entry into your property despite what they may say.

 

I've found over the years that very few DCAs send agents to collect money and intimate the threat in their letters.

23/05/06 DPA Sent to Halifax

I Love You All :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies guys.

 

I am not to worries about them turning up when i'm there i know how to handle them and my self! but i'm not always there however my disabled mother more than likely will be. I just don't want people turning up and forceing her to let them in and causing her and distress or worry.

 

Does anyone know of a link to a template letter to TS i swear i saw one a couple of days ago but i cant seam to find it now! also an address would be most helpfull. i tried to do a search but loads of threads came up where people where advising going to TS so it didn't really help.

 

Also would it help to try and find a name/address of a manager/director of AIC as surely they would take the fact that there employees are harrassing people and ignoreing CCA request (and therefore commiting a criminal offence) seriously.

 

Thanks.

 

Colin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Each council has their own trading standards,so for instance if you pay council tax to Edinburgh City Council then contact the council for their Trading Standards address & telephone number. i have not seen a template letter for TS, but write simply that you requested a copy of the original agreement plus £1 (in fact send them a copy of letter sent to AIC) that the timescale has long since elapsed and they are still pursuing you. also write as I said to AIC stating that you record all calls and will be using them as evidence ...etc. Send it by recorded delivery to head of customer services.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We're looking at trying to produce a generic complaints form (possibly with the CAG brand attached) to be used to send to Trading Standards. The OFT has said that the behavior of debt collectors is improving. All the evidence suggests that it isn't but people aren't complaining- presumably because they are too busy fending off the harassment and trying to earn enough to feed their kids.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can understand why you would be worried about your mum being left to deal with anyone who turns up. To give you both peace of mind why don't you write a simple letter for her to give anyone who turns up stating that they have ignored your wishes for written communication only and if anyone else visits, you will report them for harrassment.

 

That way, if anyone does turn up (which I doubt) she can just hand the letter over and close the door.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the names and addresses for the directors and company secretaries if you still want them.

Spotnot v MBNA and their nasty solicitors (on behalf of my friend)

 

If I have helped in any way, click my scales.

 

Remember, we were all newbies once!!

 

When you win, donate!!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some good ideas there people, Thanks very much.

 

Seminole

I especially like the idea for a generic compaint for with the CAG logo on.

 

Any ideas as to when this will be availble? If its not going to be about for a while don't worry I will knock up a letter to send to my local TS.

 

Sarahpp

That is also a very good idea but i'm not sure if that would get rid of them, i just don't want them to end up forcing there way past my mum to get in to my house.

 

Spotnot.

If you could provide me with the names and contact addresses of the directors that would be great as i'm sure a letter to them and a copy of the one i send to TS would bring the actions of there employees to there attention!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries, will pm them to you later this evening. ;)

Spotnot v MBNA and their nasty solicitors (on behalf of my friend)

 

If I have helped in any way, click my scales.

 

Remember, we were all newbies once!!

 

When you win, donate!!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the bailiffs do come to the door you do not have to let them in. Make sure all windows and doors are locked so they cannot make an entry though these. A letter is usually sent out stating a date when they will be calling at your house anyway, just make sure you are prepared or out for the day with all doors and window locked. If they attempt an entry in this case they can be prosecuted for burglary. Added to that it be worth your while to send either a letter or email of complaint about this company to the OFT, i did this due to harassment from a bank 2 years ago they suddenly stopped phoning me and used letters as i had requested so it does work, as well as that TS is always a good place to contact. There are no debtors prisons today so please do not let these nasty people get you down or worry you in any way, they really are not worth it and just remember where they are concerned what goes around comes around and good luck :)

Lloyds TSB -Settled in full 30/08/06 :)

Now whoes next :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are debt collectors not baliffs. They have no rights of entry whatsoever. The measures outlined above are not necessary. All that is needed is a polite "please leave my premises and put anything you wish to say to me in writing".

 

It is extremely unlikely that anyone will call anyway, they usually just use this as a scare tactic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...