Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wrongly convicted Horizon victims in Scotland to be exonerated NEWS.STV.TV Victims who faced wrongful convictions are to be exonerated the day after Royal Assent is granted.  
    • If anybody has any advice here, it would be greatly appreciated, I already suffer with pre-existing disabilities & have struggled with this so far. 
    • so return of goods order etc etc read upload  scan pages to jpg, redact in mspaint. the convert to and merge to one mass PDF  read upload and use the online listed sites for all 3 stages. do you want to keep the car? i will guess this was a manual paper claimform direct from the co.court or was it org sent from salford bulk processing and has just got reaq ssigned?      
    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue –  29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM 1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached  2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00. The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month. 3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement, Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us. Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement 9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate 4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:- a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement  number xxxxxx. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     The total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by First class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges 5.  At the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage. Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024  What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Need Some Advice Please.


RCR50
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6175 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Photoman hi

 

Thank you sooo much for your reply - it is soo helpful I cannot tell you and the link is a great help both practically and in terms of moral.

 

I am feeling a bit out of my depth with all of this...I am very grateful to you.

 

Best wishes

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

PM pretty much summed it up there. What I would also add though which is important, is that claiming CI is not just about pleading it on the claim form. You must understand the principles upon which you are claiming it - and believe in them, understand it is unsubstantiated in law, and that you could well have to argue it in court.

  • Haha 1

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry - deleted this post..was being an air head and have now got my head around things using photoman`s business link....

 

thanks all.

 

thanks Gary too - your links above are amazing.

everything you could possibly need to know

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because I had asked LTSB from the beginning for contractual interest at the lower rate, I decided to keep my court claim to this however, could I ask whether you feel this is viable.

 

On the particulars of claim...when it got to part 5 I have put,

 

Accordingly the Claimant claims (a) The return of the amounts debited in respect of charges and any interest charged thereon of £**** Plus contractual interest in the sum of £***** on the legal basis of Balance and Fairness. (The principle of mutuality and reciprocity). I am claiming the lower rate of interest at 18.9%. However, as the Defendant took my money without any lawful authority to do so the court might decide the Defendants unauthorised rate of 28.9% (£****) on Balance and Fairness is more just and I will leave this solely tot he courts discretion. (b) Court costs. © Interest pursuant to section 69 County Courts Act 1984 from date of issue to etc etc ........

 

I know that I really should know all this stuff but how many copies of the claim form do I send to the court and do I just include a copy of breakdown of charges - and if so, how many.

 

Thank you!!!! This is scary! I noticed today that Colmore Row recieved my prelim on current a/c. I don`t know where you are Guido but I am becoming sooo brave.

 

Couldn`t have done any of this without you chaps..

 

PS Gary, did you put that A-Z guide together yourself - It is amazing!....and I am still asking questions!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent my prelim letter to LTSB on my current account a couple of weeks ago. Also, I put in my court claim this week on my business account. Today I received a letter from LTSB saying they were sorry that I was still unhappy with my charges but this was their final response --- obviously, no way they would return my charges and they enclosed a booklet for the financial ombudsman...It is slightly confusing because I don`t know whether they think my prelim letter on current a/c was a continuation of my claim on my business account......Should I now just send an LBA on my current a/c.

 

Also, it is 2 weeks since MBNA received my LBA and I have had no response - should I just put in my court claim now...

 

Many thanks.

 

Best wishes

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent my prelim letter to LTSB on my current account a couple of weeks ago. Also, I put in my court claim this week on my business account. Today I received a letter from LTSB saying they were sorry that I was still unhappy with my charges but this was their final response --- obviously, no way they would return my charges and they enclosed a booklet for the financial ombudsman...It is slightly confusing because I don`t know whether they think my prelim letter on current a/c was a continuation of my claim on my business account......Should I now just send an LBA on my current a/c.

 

Also, it is 2 weeks since MBNA received my LBA and I have had no response - should I just put in my court claim now...

 

Many thanks.

 

Best wishes

 

If you have followed procedure properly, and all your letters contain the relevent account numbers, it is their own error if they are confusing the two claims.

Proceed to next stage on each claim as per the timeline you have given, and that includes your MBNA claim.

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Photoman

 

I have indeed sent letters with relevant account numbers on etc and followed everything by the CAGs book etc......I shall just press on then - THANK YOU! - I hope that your claim is going well...I have not been keeping up with threads - must read your thread - I do believe that you are claiming full contractual interest and started your claim at the beginning of the year....hope it is progressing well.

 

Thank you again

 

All the best

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could I ask anybody please....just getting very cold feet `again`What are the chances of LTSB calling in my authorised overdraft facility or closing my account. I have never had any disputes with them pror to this - have been a customer for over 20 years and, whilst I do use my overdraft facility to the limit I have only gone over my limit temporarily once or twice in the last couple of years.

 

I was looking at some other threads and I read that LTSB threatened to take Fishpond to court for settlement of his loan and overdraft.

 

My overdraft facility is up for review every July when they simply add another year to it...I am beginning to feel very anxious about the whole thing again.....Also - as I am claiming on two accounts with LTSB - my business a/c is closed - is this likely to make them more retaliatory.....just getting anxious about the whole thing.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be brave.

 

I have not heard of them closing account for some time now, in particular after the banks were told off and fined for retaliatory activities a month or so ago.

 

I think Pondfish 'Fishpond' has different circumstances to you, where the sum has been defaulted, but I am working off memory (sorrry Pondy if I am wrong).

 

Do not worry.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

RCR

There are measures you can take under the Banking code, when an account is in dispute (ie; the amount you actually owe them is in dispute, as it certainly is) This means that they cannot take retaliatory actions.

Michael Browne just posted me this link to forward onto you regards this.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bank/76054-barclays-withdrawing-overdraft.html?highlight=Banking+Code

 

regards

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guido and Photoman,

 

Thank you both very much for your help.....very grateful to you both.

I shall try not to worry too much and certainly, the info that you have passed onto me really helps. Thanks!

 

I tried to click both of your scales but I was told - and I quote, that I `had to spread my reputation around a bit before giving it to either of you again!!`

 

I honestly absolutely would not be able to do any of this without you guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I be a nuisance and ask somebody to clarify something for me please.

 

I want to fill in my claim form for a small amount from MBNA - however, they repaid me £280 as a good will gesture after my prelim......I sent a LBA asking for the outstanding amount.....what confuses me is the 8% interest.....I do not know exactly which of my charges would have been the £280 and it is impossible to calculate the 8% on the outstanding amount. Therefore, do I just add 8% to the initial claim and then deduct £280 from that amount as my claim?

 

I received my notice of issue on LTSB today....

 

Thanks anyone.

 

Best wishes

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I be a nuisance and ask somebody to clarify something for me please.

 

I want to fill in my claim form for a small amount from MBNA - however, they repaid me £280 as a good will gesture after my prelim......I sent a LBA asking for the outstanding amount.....what confuses me is the 8% interest.....I do not know exactly which of my charges would have been the £280 and it is impossible to calculate the 8% on the outstanding amount. Therefore, do I just add 8% to the initial claim and then deduct £280 from that amount as my claim?

 

I received my notice of issue on LTSB today....

 

Thanks anyone.

 

Best wishes

 

Just try entering the amount paid back as a negative figure on your spreadsheet, with a description something along lines of " PArtial repayment recieved", and the date it was recieved.

The spreadsheet should then just work out the outstanding amount.

Let us know if this works.

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Photoman - thanks!

 

I could not make the spreadsheet do what you suggested - probably just me! but I realised that MBNA had paid me anything above what they had charged me over £12 so I just changed all the entries in my spreadsheet to £12....I am sure that what you suggested does actually work - just not for an air head like me!

 

Thanks PM - hope all is going well for you.

 

All the best

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Dear anyone!

 

I know this is my LTSB thread - however, can I possibly ask about my MBNA claim - I did not get a respone to my LBA and really should have put in my court claim by now.....However over the past week, when I get home there is always a message from MBNA on my answerphone...it does sound a bit automated with exactly the same message that does not say my name at all and there is a long pause before anybody speaks..so I sense it is not an actual person on the phone - it asks me to call a certain number.....I do know that `if` this is about my claim, I will mess it up completely because if they speak of charges being valid and that I knew what their conditions were when I opened my account, I know that I will end up saying, `Okay, alright then`.....I would be useless, I did say in my prelim and LBA to them that I would like all correspondence between us to be via letter......should I just ignore these calls from them and just put in my court claim??

Sorry - I don`t mind admitting that I am a girlie all on my own and I do not like confrontation etc...and I find all of this so scary.

I received a notice from the court that acknowledgement of service had been filed with LTSB - business a/c and they have indicated an intention of defending all of the claim....Is this standard?

I have not sent my LBA on my current a/c yet - it is for 3k and I am waiting until my annual review of my od facility where they normally just add another year - this is july 17 - I figure that if I wait until I have another year put on the facility, there is less chance of them calling in the facility (which is at its limit - lathough I do keep inside that limit). I do find this all so scary......

Anyway, I do hope that your claims are going according to plan.

Best wishes

Link to post
Share on other sites

lloyds case is usual they do defend most cases so don't worry about that you'll get an allocation for it soon and just go from there , the MBNA one just ignore calls or if it is on your home phone you can ring bt and tell them you are getting niusance calls they give you a facility which allows you to block the number they are calling from by pressing something on phone when they ring or if they withold number again bt have a facility to ignore blocked numbers so they can't ring you but just let them write to you then you have proof of everything they say , LISAM696969 hope this helps if it has click my scales thanks !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

MBNA - Do not bother to phone then, just file your claim at court. If they want to settle in full they can write to you.

 

On business account, yes this is normal, normally Foot Anstey are the solicitors, not SCM.

 

On current account, I would not wait until the 17 July, if they choose to call in the facility they will do so in any event at any time. I have not heard on them calling this in for some time though.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both very much indeed - I am very grateful for your help and you have put my mind at rest.

 

Guido, the solicitors are Sechiari Clark and Mitchell.....Still hesitant about putting in current a/c claim until OD has been reviewed - I figure it is reviewed automatically with just a year put onto it if there have been no probs and defaults - which there have not - I feel that to put in a claim means the account is actually looked at and they might get stroppy....thank you anyway.....still not sure.

 

Many thanks.....best wishes

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both very much indeed - I am very grateful for your help and you have put my mind at rest.

 

Guido, the solicitors are Sechiari Clark and Mitchell.....Still hesitant about putting in current a/c claim until OD has been reviewed - I figure it is reviewed automatically with just a year put onto it if there have been no probs and defaults - which there have not - I feel that to put in a claim means the account is actually looked at and they might get stroppy....thank you anyway.....still not sure.

 

Many thanks.....best wishes

 

RCR50

 

Even when an account overdraft is renewed a Bank still put in clauses that they are entitled to recall all sums outstanding upon it upon demand at any time within the term of it anyway. Ordinarily they are fully within their rights to do this.

Your better approach would be. Wait for confirmation that the overdarft is renewed. Proceed with your actions anyway, upon commencement of which they may freeze any further borrowing even if the account is not at it's full overdraft limit. They will be fully entitled to do this.

If however they also attempt to then recall any current borrowing, this can be countered by an assertion that the true extent of your liability to them is currently in dispute, and that such actions are purely retaliatory.

They will have no rights whilst the action is under way to recall said amounts (provided they are lower in total to the full amount of your claim, interest and costs, anything above may be tricky).

There have been plenty of cases on site of people in similar situations, who have sucessfully halted any such retaliatory actions, so hunt around or Pm some site helpers or Mods for advice.

 

BTW. Have you set up an Umbrella account?

 

Best Regards

 

Photoman

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Photoman hi

 

Many thanks for that - as always a really good help - very grateful...I shall have a look at the links.....will set up an umbrella account today online.

 

I think that I shall indeed wait until my overdraft facility is reviewed before proceeding with current account claim.....It is so wrong that, as in most things, it is the most vulnerable, the weakest (the most hard up) that are often afraid to stand up for themselves. Our claims should be entirely independent to what is going on with our bank accounts - we are paying for the privilege of those facilities - they were agreed by the bank in the first place.....and none of this should be `allowed` to be affected by us asking back for what was unlawfully taken from us. On my current account they had been taking a whacking £60 for inadvertently going over my limit for a couple of days at one stage....and then once people started reclaiming bank charges it was dropped to around £30.....I know that overdraft facilities can be called in as stated - but if we have been a customer for a long time and have stayed within the limit of that facility and faithfully paid them for the facility, it is outragious that they call in overdrafts just because we are reclaiming charges......My overdraft facility is infact larger than my claim as well!!!I shall read the links photoman and thanks again.

I hope that your claim is going well...if I recall, you are claiming unauthorised and I hope that all goes well and it is settled soon.

 

Best wishes

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry - its me again!

 

I have obviously scanned the site over the past few months - however, just so that I am absolutely sure, can anybody tell me please what the state of play is....I am not sure whether I just leave things and wait to hear from the court etc....

The court sent a notice of issue saying it would be deemed served to LTSB on 12 may.....and then I received a notice from the court saying the defendant filed an acknowledgement of service on 24 May - Apparently they indicate an intention to defend all of the claim......

Just to be sure, do I just wait now and do nothing. They have until this coming Saturday to file a defence.

Can anybdy tell me please what happens next.....

Thank you!

Best wishes

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi RCR.

 

Nothing you can do until at least next Monday. Even then you might as well wait another week to see if LTSB slip a defence in at the last minute.

The court wil be inclined to allow it, even if it's a few days late!

 

When you feel you've waited long enough, check with the court to see if they have received anything and, if not, you can apply for judgment.:)

 

Els

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a copy of LTSB defence today......(I know that I should really completely understand elementary stuff like this by now - but would appreciate some reassurance please).

 

Is this just a standard defence...It is three pages long and lists 10 points....It basically states over and over that these are not penalties but fees for a service - that I was fully aware of their terms when I became a customer and it is a misconception on my part to think that I claim a refund of interest on overdrafts (I did not - I just claimed the interest on the OD as a result of penalties etc as everybody here has.....)....I am panicking aren`t I!!!!

 

Can I just ask whether you feel this is just a standard defence.....and what I do now please.....Do I just hang on and wait to hear from the court again.....

 

Thank you!!!!!

 

All the best

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...