Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
    • no you can email it dont worry about that. take out the index of statement of truth, just not needed
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Clinch/Blackhorse Finance Advice for now unaffordable car please - want to VT


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 105 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I hope someone can offer advice.

Asking on behalf of my daughter who has mental health issues and can't cope with this sort of thing.

Thanks in advance.

My daughter, who is on benefits due to quite severe mental health problems, purchased a car through Cinch. I think it was between £8,000 and £10,000.

I appreciate it's probably not their business to check on affordability, but at the time I thought it ridiculous she could buy such an expensive car while on benefits. This happened about a year ago I think.

Fast forward to now and as she has moved out of my house, where she lived free, and moved into a privately rented place she can no longer afford to pay for it. These things happen and I'm certainly not blaming anybody.

I just want to be able to help her out of the situation with as little drama as possible 

I was thinking maybe best just to let them repossess the car ,which I guess they will do eventually ,or inform them of the situation to speed up the repossession.

Then apply for something like a DRO to deal with the finance shortfall which I think will be a considerable amount as the car is not in a good way.

I would be really grateful for the opinions and suggestions of the kind and helpful people I know use and run this site.

Many thanks,

Billy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is absolutely cinch's business to check on affordability. If they haven't and you can prove that they have given credit to someone they know couldn't afford it at the time then that would be irresponsible lending.

Naturally this doesn't apply if they could afford it at the time and now can't (cinch aren't fortune tellers)

Don't do anything yet!

How long have they had the car and how long is the finance? Who is the finance company?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying Lolerz.

She has done nothing as yet apart from being unable to pay the last payment or two.

I believe the finance is with Black Horse.

She has had the car about a year and the finance has about 3 years or slightly less to run with an option at the end to return the car or pay a large payment to keep it.

Thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so PCP agreement with blackhorse i will guess?

if she has not paid to the 1/3rd mark (see back of agreement for the figure) then the goods are not protected under the consumer credit act.

DO NOT HAND THE CAR BACK OR LET THEM TAKE IT!! it will cost you dear!! 

where is the car parked, on private land or a driveway? if not get it parked there ASAP and NOT ON A PUBLIC ROAD. (they can simply snatch it once they issue a default notice)

you could start an unaffordable lending claim against CLINCH

Irresponsible lending (IRL) PDL Reclaim Guide - Indepth Step By Step - PayDay loans and Short Term loans - General - Consumer Action Group

if its works everything might be rolled back and cost nothing other than handing the car over but let's see. 

was she on benefits before the move out only too? was her file shot with defaults and lots of outstanding lending when she got the car?

DO NOT do a DRO if you can poss avoid it. as it wont only be for the car finance but all her debts and that turns unsecured debt into a legally binding order. not a good idea. esp as she is renting, they wont like that on her file.

if the IRL  fails then best bet is to do a Voluntary Termination ONLY , she must instigate that NOT let Clinch do a Voluntary Surrender!

VT costs only to the 50% mark.

VS cost the 100% loan amount minus what they get reselling the car.

let us know your thoughts now please

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx.

She has never looked at her credit file so I am going to try and help her do it tomorrow.

Pretty sure she hasn't reached the one third mark but I'll check with her tomorrow.

I just read the unaffordable lending thing and didn't really understand it.

I do know it mentions a Voluntary Termination is available in her paperwork.

The car is on a public road but I could get her to move it to my drive if this helps.

She was on benefits while she lived at mine too.

She only really had money for the car because I let her stay for free.

Many thanks for getting back to me. I'll try to find out more tomorrow

Regards

Billy

Link to post
Share on other sites

IRL is a complaint the finance was mis sold because they might not have done any credit checks on her, which under lending laws they must.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now seen her credit file. It only really shows the car loan and the car insurance.

I guess this means she can't claim they didn't do affordability checks so what would be advice as to her next step?

Thanks in advance

Billy

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok

well BH aren't known for being nasty etc, they are lloyd a mainstream bank. not like moneybarn motonova etc etc. that can be very nasty.

does she want to keep the car?
but its just going to be if truthful there is no chance of being able to pay for it realistically going forward and ofcourse use = running costs too?

the cheapest option here is going to be VT (has to write) whereby she will only owe to the 50% mark detailed on the back of their agreement. and as its BH i suspect once that is done and dusted , will most probably be persuaded to accept even lower payments.

your thoughts

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying dx.

No she doesn't want to keep the car. It's cost and other running costs are impossible for her now . I just want to get the situation settled with the least amount of stress for her because of her mental health. 

Cheers,

Billy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Clinch/Blackhorse Finance Advice for now unaffordable car please - want to VT

voluntary termination then.

have a read of this thread CAREFULLY

everything is there in good detail.

MoneyBarn - Voluntary Termination - Moneybarn Issues - Consumer Action Group

thread title updated and moved to the Blackhorse forum

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

let us know

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...