Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Before you do any of the above – Stop! You need to spend a few days reading up on the stories on this sub- forum so that you understand the principles and you understand how to go about making your claim. We will help you – and you have a better than 95% chance of getting your money back – but you need to be in control of what you are doing. We will help you – but this is a self-help forum and you need to have done the reading so that you are confident of each step and you know your way forward. Please don't do anything at all – in particular don't send a letter of claim – until you have done all the reading and I would suggest that probably you will start drafting your letter of claim over the weekend. Also, you haven't told us anything about what has happened. We don't know dates, items dispatched, value, whether they were properly declared, whether you bought so-called insurance, you have been declined reimbursement but we don't know why. If you want us to help you then you will have to give us this basic information. Also the fact that you are an eBay trader makes this slightly more complicated although it doesn't at all affect your chances of success.  Read the other threads on this sub- forum – and especially the pinned threads at the top in order to understand the principles. You also quickly understand the kind of help that we will give you and you will understand some of the draft documents which have been used in other successful claims.
    • Thanks, I'm finishing up the skeleton and hope to have it done today. Will look at statement of case too and get that done over the next few days.
    • But, but, but... They've already sent you a letter of claim, which said... "Should the outstanding balance not be settled by 20/04/20204 we will commence legal proceedings against you without further notice." 🤣 🤣 🤣
    • Thanks DX, I appreciate that.   I've sent off the change of address to them. They should have that by now...
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

GXS/Trace DCA 2*ANPR PCNs - appeals refused - Lady Bee Marina, Shoreham Port


Recommended Posts

Dear forum members, please can you consider my case and next steps. Thank you.  

I received 2 PCNs for parking in Lady Bee Marina, Shoreham Port owned land. 2 evenings on consecutive weeks.

PCN 1 17/10/2023,

PCN 2 26/10/2023

I appealed both through online appeal portal within 21 days.

PCN 1 on basis that signage wasn't clear to indicate it was land controlled by GXS and ANPR.

Appealed PCN 2 on basis that PCN 1 did not arrive in the post until 10 days after PCN 1 and I parked again in same spot within 8 days, reason again unclear signage. 

Mitigating factors:

It was dark when I parked on both occasions.

There was a Shoreham Port Authority logo sign visible, attached to the only lamp post in the area,  saying 'Shoreham Port authorised users only' no mention of GXS or parking conditions on this sign.

I parked directly under this lamp post intentionally, assessing this to be the safest place as a woman on my own in a dark car park in a quiet, non-residential area. There have been recent assaults on women in the area, so my attention primarily was on my safety and getting from my car to the building.

I was attending an evening class within Shoreham port authority buildings and believed that I was authorised to park.

On returning to the area in the daylight after I received the PCNs, I noted there is no sign as you enter the area from the road at all to indicate there are parking conditions.  There was a GXS sign behind the area where I parked, low down at knee height attached to railings by the harbour edge. It explains you need to pay to park on an app. 

I did not receive a response to the appeals.

On 12/12/2023 I receive a final demand letter in post from GXS with charge increased to £160 per PCN. 

I contact GXS on 12/12/2023 by email, and 15/12 and 24/12 by telephone (left voicemail) to explain I had not received the outcome of my appeals. 

21/12/2023 Letter received from Trace debt recovery informing me GXS have passed by case to them, with charges increased to £170 per PCN, £340 in total.

27/12/2023 I receive an email from GXS with a copy of the outcome of appeal letter attached to the email with the date 14/11/2023, no wording in email to say whether this letter  was allegedly sent in post or emailed.   Outcomes of appeal 'declined' for both, on basis that signage meets industry standards. This is the first time I have received this letter. 

28/12/2023 I telephone GXS. No answer, leave a voicemail asking them to update their system with the outcome of appeal letter date to 27/12/2023, to allow me to action the options in the outcome of appeal letter (1. second stage appeal or 2. pay the charge of £60).

As I did not receive the letter of 14/11/2023, both these options are blocked to me as more than 21 days have passed since that date. No response received from GXS. 

8/1/2024 I telephone trace to inform of above and that I can't get through . Trace say that GXS will not communicate with me as case passed to Trace.

9/1/2024 I submit a complaint to GXS on the complaints email address on their website. No response received to date. 

10/1/2024 Email received from Trace, who inform me they have spoken with GXS who report that "It is too late to make claims I did not receive a response to your appeal", as it says on PCN that if you do not hear from us within 28 days, please contact us, do not assume your appeal has been successful. 

12/1/2024 I submit a complaint about GXS customer service to IPC.

My points are:

1. GXS online appeals portal unfair for 'customer' as it doesn't generate any record for the customer of the appeal submission - no reference number, no copy of your appeal statement, no ability to enter the portal after submission to check status/date/content of your appeal is emailed to you. 

The customer is therefore unaware of the date they submitted the appeal and cannot go back to the portal and check. Customer has to use guess work as to when they submitted the appeal to calculate when to contact GXS if they haven't received a response. 

2.  My argument is that when I contacted GXS on 12 Dec,  I had no record of the appeal submission date. I recall submitting the appeals middle of November roughly, so contacting GXS 12 Dec I don't believe to be 'too late', that is GXS's opinion. GXS don't say how soon after 28 days to contact them. 

12/2/2024 IPC respond and say they are satisfied GXS have not breached member code of conduct in this case.

GXS have provided them with system report of letters and emails sent, showing they emailed the outcome of appeal letter 14/11, copied it to me by email 13/12.  (I did not received either of these emails, have checked junk and contact my email provider for support, there is no system record of those emails arriving at my inbox). 

IPC didn't comment about the issues I raised about appeals portal. 

I am unsure of next steps.  Please advise. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to GXS/Trace DCA 2*Windscreen pcns - appeals refused - Lady Bee Marina, Shoreham Port

Info for PCN 1: 

1 Date of the infringement 17/10/2023

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 20/10/2023
 

[scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s

 

3 Date received 27/10/2023
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] N
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Y
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Y - no copy of it available, did it through GXS online appeals portal. after you press 'submit' it disappears and you can't re-enter portal. 
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Y
 

7 Who is the parking company? GXS Services Ltd

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Shoreham Port Authority Lady Bee Marina, Southwick, BN42 4EG
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

IAS
 

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure,

please check HERE

 

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here

 

Copy the windscreen or ANPR section to your thread and answer the questions...

……....

In either case scan up bothsides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY

PCN 1 redacted.pdf outcome of appeal PCN1 letter.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Info for PCN 2: 

1 Date of the infringement 26/10/2023

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 30/10/2023
 

[scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s

 

3 Date received 6/11/2023
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] N
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Y
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Y
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Y
 

7 Who is the parking company? GXS Services Ltd

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Shoreham Port Authority Lady Bee Marina, Southwick, BN42 4EG
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

IAS
 

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure,

please check HERE

 

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here

final reminder from GXS dated 6.12.23. Received 13.12.23

 

PCN 2 redacted.pdf outcome of appeal PCN2.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

WWW.PARKINGCOWBOYS.CO.UK

This page describes what a Notice to Keeper issued by a private parking company is, and what to do when you receive one

 This seems to suggest that when ANPR used, they send notice to keeper. Is this not correct? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. 

Re: the reasons.

I think that the specific area I parked in within the car park both times is designated for Lady Bee Marina boat owners.

It did say 'Lady Bee Marina - authorised users' on the Shoreham Port sign I think (I foolishly thought that covered me as the course I was attended was in a building in Lady Bee Marina, but now know there are people that live on the boats in the marina I think there are specific places for them to park)

I am feeling very worn down by this all, I've spent so much time on it already.

I was prepared to pay the £60x2 if the appeal was declined.

I appealed in good faith.

GXS refusing to accept I didn't receive the outcome of appeal emails and refusing to change the outcome of appeal letter date to the date I actually received it (27 Dec) and upping the charge to £340 is completely unjustified and makes me want to fight it.  

It is worth offering to pay the £60x2 to settle the matter.

That is the outcome I would settle for to be honest? 

If I do fight it, it would be the rubbish signage, particularly in the dark.

There really aren't visible signs to indicate there is ANPR and that it is controlled by GXS.

No signs at all as you pull off the highway into that area.

You really aren't aware of the 'contract' you are entering into as you drive in.

It is very poor. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to GXS/Trace DCA 2*ANPR PCNs - appeals refused - Lady Bee Marina, Shoreham Port

Hi, Thank you all for your help so far.

 I've had limited time to progress this, between work and caring responsibilities...

I've started a draft to the Shoreham Port Chief Exec - assuming this the best person to address to?

Planning to deliver by hand.

However, I'm not clear what I'm asking from the landowner and on what basis for a realistic outcome (i.e. ask GSX to cancel charges or ask GSX to enable me to pay reduced rate £60x2)  -. Guidance on wording would be appreciated.

GXS said in appeal response that signage 'meets industry standards' so I'm not sure if this point can be reasonably used? Looks like there isn't a requirement to have signage at the entry to the area. 

Byelaws - Do I include something about this in letter? 

I've attached a draft for your consideration. Thanks. 

Parking Shoreham Port Authority FINAL.pdf

Subject Access Request is next on my list. 

Do you have a template you could share for the wording I need to use on that please? 

Thanks. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...