Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Sorry  Noted x   Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Working tax credit overpayment


LilMissM
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 286 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received a letter from LCS credit management as follows:

 

Your Tax Credits debt of £1XXX.XX

 

HM Revenue and Customs records show that your tax credit debt remains unpaid and the debt has now been passed to us to deal with. You need to pay the amount above now.

 

If you are finding it difficult to pay, we can offer you help. Please phone us to discuss whether you could spread your payments.

 

Unless you pay or call us now, we may commence formal debt collection activity.

 

Now I originally disputed the amount they were saying I owed and the last communication I received from the Tax Credit Office was in September 2014 as follows:

 

Dear XXXXXX,

 

Thank you for contacting us about your tax credits overpayment. You have asked us to consider if you should have to pay it back. I am sorry for the delay in replying.

 

I have looked at the information that you have given us. Because you were unable to meet your responsibilities under our Code of Practice 26, you do not have to pay back £131.76. This is the money we overpaid you between July to October 2012.

 

You need to pay back £293.88. This is because we paid you too much tax credits. The reason we paud you yoo much for this tax year was because we paid you more than you were entitled to in provisional payments at the start of the tax year.

 

We based your provisional payments for 2012-2013 on your estimated income of £9,833 for 2011-2012. The annual declaration you sent us in July 2012 confirmed that your actual annual income for 2011-2012 was £11,821.

 

We used the income figure you gave us in July 2012 to work out your actual entitlement for which was £501.19. Because we had already paid you £926.83 in provisional payments, this meant that we had paid you £293.88 too much.

 

Can anyone please shed any clarity on this for me please as my head is battered with it x

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore the DCA

they are totally powerless

and are not BAILIFFS.

 

 

deal with HMRC directly only

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you work out from both those letters just how much I do actually owe? I have some handwritten notes I made from a telephone call with HMRC about this. My notes, as I recall, were what the lady on the phone was advising me to do.

 

Still disagree with 2012-2013 - take into account new evidence provided. I returned annual declaration on 30/06/12 and told them my income was £11.821, however records were not updated until October 2012 so there was a delay in updating my records. Look into it again. Make a complaint if no joy.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers i'd be sending HMRC a Free SAR

prove or disprove their case

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have today received a letter from HMRC asking me to fill in a form to enable them to send me the relevant information I require.

It looks like a pretty standard letter explaining that I may not need all of the historical data they have and to fill in the attached form from which they can then send me the information I am asking for.

It also says I can phone if I need more information.

Should I give them a call or just fill in the form and send it back straight away?

I have also received today a letter from LCS regarding the overpaid tax credits with a subject heading in big bold letters "DO NOT IGNORE: Notice of Further Action"

What should I do about them?

Should I phone them and tell them I am dealing with HMRC

and I have submitted an SAR?

LilMissM said:
Thank you for contacting us about your tax credits overpayment. You have asked us to consider if you should have to pay it back. I am sorry for the delay in replying.

 I have looked at the information that you have given us. Because you were unable to meet your responsibilities under our Code of Practice 26, you do not have to pay back £131.76. This is the money we overpaid you between July to October 2012.

 You need to pay back £293.88.

This is because we paid you too much tax credits.

T he reason we paid you to much for this tax year was because we paid you more than you were entitled to in provisional payments at the start of the tax year.

 We based your provisional payments for 2012-2013 on your estimated income of £9,833 for 2011-2012.

The annual declaration you sent us in July 2012 confirmed that your actual annual income for 2011-2012 was £11,821.

 We used the income figure you gave us in July 2012 to work out your actual entitlement for which was £501.19.

Because we had already paid you £926.83 in provisional payments, this meant that we had paid you £293.88 too much.

 Can anyone please shed any clarity on this for me please as my head is battered with it x

And can anyone make sense of that?

Can anyone work out just how much they are saying I owe in that letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to pay back £293.88.

 

so you need the sar data to be able to prove or disprove they are correct.

 

as for the DCA

how many more times YOU IGNORE THEM TOTALLY.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha ok I consider myself well and truly told there!

And the £293.88 is the amount that I believe I owe, going from that letter they sent. I don't understand why I am being chased for an amount that is over a thousand pounds, when the letter from HMRC says that after reviewing it further, I was overpaid a total of £293.88!

Thank you dx, a million thank you's :)

Shouldn't the letter from HMRC saying I owe £293.88 be proof enough though?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no harm in checking they are correct mind..

back to post 1 really...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

prove them wrong

is there evidence they can use to prove their case in black & white

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

From their files dated 25/03/14:

 

"The O/P for 11/12 occurred due to increased income. T

he award of £1313.73 was made based on household income of £9833.00.

The appl told us this income on 28/06/11.

The appl then told us that her correct income was £11821.00.

 

We then used the lower CY of £11503.00.

This reduced the entitlement to £628.03.

T he appl received more than the new lower entitlement amount.

HMRC met all resp therefore this overpayment is fully recoverable.

Advised more imform required for possible exceptional circs.

 

The O/P for 12/13 occured because the provisional payments were made based on household income of £9833.00.

The appl returned the s17 and told us the correct income was £11821.00 which reduced the entitlement to £509.19.

The appl had already received more in prov payments. HMRC met all resp therefore this overpayment is fully recoverable."

 

From their files dated 18-09-14:

 

"Decision/Overpayment reason(s)

- Overpayment review 12-13.

Post receivevd 10-06-14.

Previous deision 2-06-14 overturned.

 

Part remit 131.76 as we rec'd income via s17 on 30/07/12 not amended till 26-10-12.

Part rec £293.88 due to inc increase on initial award."

 

There is a letter dated 19th September 2014 from HMRC, which I have posted already, saying

 

Thank you for contacting us about your tax credits overpaymentlink3.gif.

You have asked us to consider if you should have to pay it back.

I am sorry for the delay in replying.

 

I have looked at the information that you have given us.

Because you were unable to meet your responsibilities under our Code of Practice 26,

you do not have to pay back £131.76.

This is the money we overpaid you between July to October 2012.

 

You need to pay back £293.88.

This is because we paid you too much tax credits.

T e reason we paid you to much for this tax year was because we paid you more than you were entitled to in provisional payments at the start of the tax year.

 

We based your provisional payments for 2012-2013 on your estimated income of £9,833 for 2011-2012.

The annual declaration you sent us in July 2012 confirmed that your actual annual income for 2011-2012 was £11,821.

 

We used the income figure you gave us in July 2012 to work out your actual entitlement for which was £501.19.

Because we had already paid you £926.83 in provisional payments, this meant that we had paid you £293.88 too much.

 

In a letter from HMRC prior to that, dated 25/03/14 they say:

 

"We have recovered £21.38 of your overpayments in 2011-2012 from other years by reducing your ongoing tax credit payments.

You still need to pay back £663.32 from your future awards.

If the award with the overpayment ends, we will ask you to pay back any outstanding money direct to us.

 

You still need to pay back the overpayment of £425.64 from 2012-2013 from your future awards."

 

My head is battered with all this!

 

 

I think I should take it to the CAB

get someone experienced to look through it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

last line here

We then used the lower CY of £11503.00.

This reduced the entitlement to £628.03.

The appl received more than the new lower entitlement amount.

HMRC met all resp therefore this overpayment is fully recoverable.

Advised more imform required for possible exceptional circs.

 

 

try again..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advised more imform required for possible exceptional circs.

^^^

check that line its pants English please

 

retype it out please check it

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm their typo?

 

should read:

advised more info required for possible exceptional circs?

 

 

I read that to mean there is or might be a way out of this.

 

 

so look slightly after 25/03/14:

any indication they sent you a letter?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only correspondence after that letter of theirs dated 25/03/14 (the letter in post #1) is my letter to them dated 09/06/14 which was querying the Notice to Pay I had received. Their next letter to me after that was the one dated 19/09/14 saying I need to pay back £293.88. I think by that point it had been passed over to LCS and they told me I owe £1088.96.

 

The information in post #16 is from screenshots of their computer system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

good well atleast you've been able to confirm its id £293 rather than +£1000 the fleecing DCA were after:lol:

 

keep looking you have all w/end

then pos look at arranging a monthly? payment direct to HMRC during te week?

they'll not want a lot £5-£10 might well do?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest the majority of the stuff they have sent me is screenshots of their computer system, some of which has no info at all. There are only the three letters mentioned in this thread in with the bundle of papers. I will keep looking though. Thank you dx x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

what solicitors?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...