Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Nice first crack at it hugo, and given you're so far ahead of time, I'll give you some input - experts will be along at some point though! It is going to be difficult to assist with alot of your points as we haven't seen any paperwork, perhaps consider scanning/uploading all paperwork received since Letter of Claim? follow upload guide carefully, redacting all personal information. I've got some small tweeks to wording that might not even matter 3. Paragraph 1 is noted. I may in the past have had an agreement I have in the past had financial dealings with HSBC but do not recognize this specific account number or recollect any outstanding debt and have therefore requested clarification by way of a CPR 31.14 and section 78 request, to date both requests have not been complied with. Include dates you requested CCA and CPR, add to point 6. 6. On xx/xx/xx the Defendant submitted, by way of a letter a CCA Request for a copy of the alleged agreement pursuant to s78 CCA 1974 and on xx/xx/xx submitted by way of a letter a CPR 31.14 request. The claimant has acknowledged receipt of (Insert which one you claim they have acknowledged) but has failed to comply. Good work, expect others along to help you finalise it. Keep reading up
    • FINAL QUESTION On the N225 FORM   Where it states in the xzy court with claim number, etc Take it that will be MoneyClaim online?
    • No problem once we understood what was going on. We were in Bournemouth meeting up with my brother for the weekend, soon found another hotel.
    • That's annoying, Ethel. I'm sorry you had that happen. I hope you found something else? HB
    • Glad it's resolved HB but just to share a recent experince I had.... Had a UK hotel booking made months in advance, a few weeks before we were due to go a short message from booking.com saying hotel was no longer able to honour the booking. Money would be retuned (it was). No explanation. A bit of research by us quickly found the answer: the hotel chain had gone into liquidation!  They'd gone bust a month before booking.com told us anything about it. Altough being charitable it may be that the liquidators of the hotel chain didn't bother to tell booking.com either.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

First Direct Debt was hoist now lowell chasing daily !"


CathW
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 335 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We have a old First Direct Joint account and we have had various threatening letters from debt collection agencies in the past,

but now we are getting virtually on a daily basis letters from Lowell Financial Ltd saying that we owe them the money.


Can you tell me what letters to send please.
Regards
Catherine
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

probably because lowell have bought out hoist uk recently so now your debt is with them.

unless you have moved since your took this out and hsbc sold it to a dca... you dont reply.

no point in pointless letter tennis...

as long you have not moved

nor get a letter of claim from overdales with a reply pack wanting i&e etc, you ignore them.

when was the last time you 2 used the account or paid into it?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to First Direct Debt was hoist now lowell chasing daily !"

what

then send the our statute barred letter from the debt collection section of our library.

have you moved?

could it be possible that if you did move and didnt update the debt owner or hsbc before your moved, that they got a backdoor ccj and there is an outstanding ccj that prevents it being SB'd?

typically thats lowells remit at present that we've seen several times recently on old debts with ccj's since buying out hoist uk?

check your letters please.

and answer my questions.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...