Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Want remortgage and dump Melanite interest only mortgage - conveyancer says can't - found 2 restrictions for a failed IVA with defunked Knightsbridge!! ***Resolved***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 295 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Afternoon

 

A very brief introduction:

We've been with Melanite with an interest only libor rate mortgage for 12 years and had some horrible times including many threats of eviction etc. but have managed to claw back over 3 years with no missed payments and subsequently our Credit file is now clean enough to get a new repayment mortgage with a reputable firm,

 

however the conveyancing solicitor has hit a stumbling block because there are 2 restrictions on the property land register from Knightsbridge insolvency dating from 2012 and 2016 we did have an IVA with Knightsbridge which we let fail as they weren't bringing our debt down and we felt it better to handle it ourselves.

 

To our knowledge Knightsbridge are no more so any advise in how we remove the dispositions would be massively appreciated.

 

The restrictions noted on the title are:

4 (23.12.2013) RESTRICTION: No disposition of the registered estate by the proprietor of the registered estate is to be registered without a written consent signed by Dean Smith of Knightsbridge Insolvency Services Limited (Co.Regn.No. 07236433) Thornley House, Carrington Business Park, Carrington, Manchester, M31 4DD.

 

5 (01.06.2016) RESTRICTION: No disposition of the registered estate by the proprietor of the registered estate is to be registered without a written consent signed by Michael Sloper of Knightsbridge Insolvency Services Ltd, Thornley House, Carrington Business Park, Carrington, Manchester M31 4DD.

 

Kind regards

 

Tony

Link to post
Share on other sites

was this a joint IVA and is the property in joint names?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The restrictions aren't for any specific debt but for a failed IVA which we haven't had any correspondence with for about 7 years.

 

However the conveyancer is adamant that we can't proceed with new mortgage till the restrictions are lifted.

 

Tony

Link to post
Share on other sites

both the scammers that ran knights IVA's morphed with the co to creditfix -  which is where yours was sold onto i expect but no update on land registry.

 

www.creditfix.co.uk

 

but i dont think you need to do anything IMHO, just tell your conveyancer to get on with it.

the iva failed,  the restrictions should have been removed.

 

can you remember,.....did these scammers get you and your wife to sign a voluntary charge ? 

as this is the 1st time ive seen mentioned on deeds following an IVA sign up..

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, TonyLeeds said:

The restrictions aren't for any specific debt but for a failed IVA which we haven't had any correspondence with for about 7 years.

 

when did you take each? IVA out and when did you fail on them?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX

 

That's the weird thing we only took out 1 IVA and it failed after 3 years because the repayment they suggested was ridiculous and hardly anything had been paid off.

 

We've rang creditfix and the guy said its an oversight and he'll set wheels in motion to get it removed but we have little faith, I suppose we'll have to keep ringing until they do something.

 

kind regards and thankyou.

 

Tony

 

BTW amused to death is a great album !

Link to post
Share on other sites

most of the money you paid  for the IVA went on their fees, always the way

over sight my foot!! 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

WWW.PARACHUTELAW.CO.UK

What to do when you find an entry on your property starting 'No disposition of the registered estate..' Why it's there, what it does, and what to do.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Want remortgage and dump Melanite interest only mortgage - conveyancer says can't - found 2 restrictions for a failed IVA with defunked Knightsbridge!!
  • 1 month later...

Morning All

I looked into what I needed to do and rather go to a solicitor I decided to deal with it myself,

first thing I did was ring the land registry office and they were really helpful and told me what they needed which was me to submit a RX3 form for each of the restrictions along with a letter detailing why I thought the restrictions were no longer valid and any evidence which in my case was the Certificate of failure from when I cancelled the IVA.

I also contacted Creditfix who bought Knightsbridge and they ensured me they would deal with it as  matter of urgency....... I would have been better off saving my breath and asking my dog for help.

The Land registry office gave notice to Creditfix and about 3 weeks later the restrictions were removed and I was able to complete my new repayment mortgage.

I now no longer have to deal with the constant threat and intimidation dealt out by Melanite and Idem it's been a hard five years working two jobs but with loads of help and advice from you guys at CAG I'm now in a position where my credit file is healthy and my family home will eventually be mine.

Melanite are a scourge and what we entered into 12 years ago was what we believed to be a temporary fix ended up costing us constant worry and probably upwards of 50k. The mortgage amount at start was 165k yet we had to pay 192k to be free of them.

If anyone can advise how I can go after them for the amount of charges levied against me I would be very grateful ?

Thank you ! Thank you ! Thank you ! I wouldn't have been able to do it without you guys.

Kind Regards

Tony

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Tony good result although having only just read your thread I have never heard of restrictions being placed for a failed IVA normally the creditors or IVA company involved would go for Bankruptcy which is very rare as it involves a substantial fee.

The Restrictions were placed in the name  Michael Sloper of Knightsbridge Insolvency Services Ltd, very strange.

 

Anyway well done.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Want remortgage and dump Melanite interest only mortgage - conveyancer says can't - found 2 restrictions for a failed IVA with defunked Knightsbridge!! ***Resolved***

well done ...knew you'd get there with a push...

what do you mean by charges...you can reclaim them in certain situations....

have you say monthly arrears fees, lots of other fixed sum fees. letters phone calls debt visits..

you can go back 6yrs but if they can prove you ought to have know within 3 that they were reclaimable they can blow the whole thing out the water. 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx

The fees are for everything from solicitors costs from failed eviction attempts to alleged doorstep visits that never happened, there's no arrears because they insisted that the account be brought up to date.

The main thing they repeatedly did is applied for a suspended repossession order which they wielded like a stick even as recently as two months ago when I questioned disparity between my end of year statement and redemption statement I was told that they had a suspended repossession order even though my account had been ran in the black for over three years.

Unfortunately I feel that we had become conditioned to fear Melanite and went along without wanting to rock the boat however now we're free of them I would like to have a go at getting some redress.

Any advice on what I should do would be appreciated, I asked for our history 3 years ago and they eventually sent a cardboard box filled with stuff in no order and frankly pictures of the outside of our house intimidated us.

Any suggestions how I should proceed or let it go ?

Tony

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

solicitors fees in regard to actual litigation be it successful to them or not are sadly not reclaimable.

debt advisor fees are, esp if you had no invite to refuse the visit or advice

they and any other unlawful fees should be evident on your statements, they will be of a fixed value i'e £40, £50 etc and reoccuring.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...