Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Recommended Posts

so which 2 are you still paying and why?

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

this debt:

MBNA Bank of Scotland Card debt- LInk got a CCJ - now want payment review - MBNA - Consumer Action Group

and a barclaycard loan - did you ever send the a CCA in all these years.....when was it taken out?
 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX: I did not pursue Link after I got the CCJ amended to monthly payments. Pretty sure the CCJ does not mention reviews, I do have the CCJ somewhere, I will have to look it up in storage. It is as mentioned on the thread you referenced  in your post #28.

The Barclays loan was taken out in September 2004 for 60 months! Current Balance remaining approx £2K. On checking back my past correspondence with Barclaycard about this loan, there was a history of them ignoring my letters and offers to pay, and I even had problems in obtaining their bank account details for them to accept my payments! I have received strange correspondence from them too, one referring to insurance which I did not have. They seem very disorganised!

Barclaycard told me to pay "Masterloan" a while back and I now receive regular statements and arrears notices from "Personal Loans from Barclaycard" clearly marked Masterloan, they changed the account reference number! I have never requested a CCA on this account.

I advised them of my change of address last September, but they are still sending, until today, statements etc. to my old address! I have received 2 letters from Barclaycard Loan today though, not opened them yet!!

 

Update!

I have now opened the mail from Barclaycard. I am assuming that their letters were prompted by my confirmation to them of my change of address, which I had advised them of twice.

They are treating my change of address notification as a "General Data Protection Regulation Right of Access Request"  and state that I have made a "Right of Access Request. They are asking me to provide valid indentity documents!

I have made no such request and am minded to ignore their request for extra information?

I should add that their letters were sent to my correct current address!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds usual to me, it's happened to me before. Also the CCJ payment review is normal, they do it every year normally.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tedney said:

I should add that their letters were sent to my correct current address!

Then thats all that matters they have your correct address.

General Data Protection Regulation Right of Access Request is a DSAR request :???:

 

 

.

.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Now received a pack from Barclays Marked " Personal Data Request" and "Start of Right of Access Response"

It was sent by their General data protection Team and includes details for a loan account and a credit card.

The loan details includes a copy of a signed Credit Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, signed by me and dated 2/9/2004. It refers to Terms and conditions overleaf, but copies of these were not included in the package just received. The Original Loan expiry date was September 2009.

Barclaycard:

Their records indicate Last Billed 15/03/2024 (not rcvd. by me)

Last date account in order and not delinquent 15/03/2024.

Date account closed 31/12/9999 (!),

They show "Account not in Collections" and last payment posted 16/04/2007(!)

also Last Payment Recorded as 02/10/2023.

In their memo Details section: Section 78 Outcome "unenforceable" recorded on 12/10/2023.

As stated in this thread, I had been paying off both the loan and card.

I had stopped paying the card but am still paying the loan's nominal monthly payments.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the loan is still owned by the original creditor and not a dca then continue paying.

dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

On checking through all the loan documents,

should I have expected to see all statements for the loan account?

I only got copies up to May 2015.

The account is still current and I have been receiving, albeit by forwarded Royal mail, 3 monthly statements.

Hopefully they act on my new address advice to them sent last September!

Link to post
Share on other sites

no harm in the reminding them you've moved.

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

As per previous dx post #36, I sent reminder to Barclays Loan on May 22nd asking for written response by return that they have my current address. To date nothing received. I have now, 28/6,  sent another reminder today to their DSAR department!

No statements have been received at present address, and last statement sent to previous address was September 2023. Previously I have also received every 4 months an arrears notice too but not received lately.

t

Link to post
Share on other sites

On checking my "Soft Search" info on my credit file, I see that Barclays Bank plc have soft searched my file 7 separate times since May 2024. Each search is marked "Affordability" and each has the following abbreviations noted: (SA, SR, TAC, CT, R, CVAL, COSMOS)

Anyone know what these letters may refer to please?

I realise that soft searches are not supposed to affect my report. Apart from receiving their DSAR package, I have had no other correspondence with Barclays.

Thanks

t

Link to post
Share on other sites

ask the CRA provider what they mean.

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, tedney said:

Anyone know what these letters may refer to please?

Its when you use a comparison site for quotations.

 

Andy

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked the CRA, this is their reply, but it doesn't really help as it still doesn't give meanings:

"The search abbreviations listed on your report are specific identifiers that organisations agree with TransUnion to identify their search requests. They don’t impact your score and are not seen by lenders when applying for credit, they are only listed as part of the footprint."

I suppose I could ask Barclays as to what and why they are searching my file for? Other searches, not by Barclays, do not list the same abbreviations.

I have not used any comparison sites!

I think maybe their searches maybe connected to my recent correspondence with Barclays, but that correspondence did not involve any new financial matters, so the "Affordability" reason they gave is not correct. To search 7 times, on three occasions two entries with the same dates seems unreasonable.

I appreciate that other organisations allegedly "cannot see" these searches, but it would seem that Barclays may have another motive for their searches? If these searches are inocuous, why are they listed and stored on the file. If the subject of the file cannot know what the searches really mean?

Thanks

t

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, tedney said:

If these searches are innocuous, why are they listed and stored on the file.

because they have to.. to abide by at least gdpr rules. and probably conc too.

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Silly Question!

Am I correct in thinking that when a soft search to a credit file is made by a financial organisation, the searcher will see the basic details of the file, including the address of the person they are searching?

Link to post
Share on other sites

would be pointless otherwise

dx

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...