Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Old Lloyds defaulted loan, now with cabot offering 30% settlement


schwetta
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 589 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have a old defaulted loan from lloyds. It's dropped off credit report now, I and making £2 payment towards Cabot, last payment Aug 22. 


Lloyds sold this loan to Cabot around July 2020, who now seem to be the owner, and sending me letters to pay / settle @ 30%

 

Will be sending out a SAR to Lloyds AND Cabot??


And a CCA to Cabot (definitely think this is right from reading another post on same, cabot bought the debt so they get CCA'd)

 

Do let me know if you think otherwise,

 

Thanks in advance for your time on this!!

 

Lloyds Loan £14,494
Last Payment: £2 on 6 May 2014 to Cabot
Original Lender – Lloyds Bank (Was Lloyds Tsb) 
Current Owner - Cabot Financial
Account Type – Unsecured Loan
Status – Defaulted 3 May 13
Account Start Date – Mar 2011

Link to post
Share on other sites

As this debt is. Covered by the consumer credit Act...

 

Cca request to the ownwr.

No need to sar the OC  at this stage

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Cabot Response 14 Sep 22_Redacted.pdf

 

Just received a letter from Cabot dated 14 Sep (attached), saying they do not have relevant information on file but will be requesting a copy of the credit agreement from the original lender, this may take some time but they will write to me within the next 12 days with an update.

 

I had sent CCA Fri 2 Sep 22, and the 12+2 days expire on Fri 23 Sep 22.

 

I believe this means they have gone past the deadline and not produced a credit agreement, hence their claim is not valid anymore.

 

Is the 12+2 days based on the date of their letter, or the date I receive information??

 

Could I please confirm if my understanding is correct?

 

Thanks so much for your help as always!!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12+2 working days from date of your letter

but its immaterial really as you've ceased payment already

 

until/unless they reply with an enforceable agreement, safe to ignore/stop payment to anyone that fail CCa request.

 

probably why lloyds sold it on, they knew no signed agreement online/otherwise exists.

thats a very rare high figure for an OC to sell on, if they could have taken you to court, they would have done.

so probably the reason.

 

i bet cabot try a fake reconstructed agreement from their filing cabinet NOT yours sent from lloyds directly....with your details typed in in another font from the rest of the agreement.

this could get fun

 

dx

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...