Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case when the penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

not receiving deposit due to key holding


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6369 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My partner and I moved out of our flat on the 24th of october having given the required notice, however we are now having extreme problems getting our deposit back. We paid £693 as a deposit. The landlord we have never met i believe he lives in hong kong, we have always delt with a representative, with whom we initally viewed the flat, paid our deposit to (for which we recieved a reciept) and signed a tenancy agreement which she then sent and got signed by the land lords attorney. This representative then changed near the end of our tenancy and we had difficulty getting hold of the new one. We contacted directly the attorney, regarding our deposit who said it would be retuned when the rep had seen the room, this apparently happened a few days after we moved out, but again we heard nothing, at this point we still had the keys as we had not met with anyone to give them back. We had to make numerous calls to the rep and with the attorney to give the keys back as we were keen to get our deposit back. The upshot now is the attorney has said we will only recieve £533 due to us not giving the keys back. When i told her i was not happy with this she gave me the accountants email to discuss with. I did request the landlord but no info about him has ever been given. The accounant confirmed that was what we will be paid, i asked him to give me his details and he wrote back saying that he charged £75 for each letter/email when dealing directly with tenants. No where in our tenancy agreement is anything reagarding holding keys. Do we have a case to get our full deposit back? Also due to the landlord wanting rent paid by direct debit we had to pay a full months rent even though our agreement ended a full week before the end of the month. We were told by the representative that this would be refunded to us with our deposit. When we discussed this with the attorney we were told that we had to give a calender months notice, but again this was not in our tenancy agreement, are we entilted to that money back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thats a tricky one. Firstly what was the actual notice period stated in your tenancy agreement? Its usually two months or one omonth if your tenancy has rolled 'periodic'. If it was a periodic tenancy then you would have had to have given notice on a rent day IE the day you paid you rent every month for it to be valid. Either way this must be done in writing. If you paid rent after the expiration of a valid notice period then this is lawfully due back to you.

 

If the owner was overseas then by law (section 48 a+b Landlord and Tenant Act) he must provide an address for service of notices in the UK. If this changes then you should have been informed. This should be on your tenancy agreement.

 

With regard to keys its difficult. If they were not returned then the landlord is within his rights to charge you for replacement locks however as you state there was no one to hand keys back to. I would suggest you negotiate on this point.

 

With regard to the £75 charge for correspondence....utter crap! It would never be in a tenancy agreement as it would be seen as an unfair term.

 

I suggest finding out exactly who has power of attorney in the UK to act on the owners behalf and deal only with them if you think you are getting a raw deal then approach your local CAB (citizens advice) their website is quite good to start with.

 

Good Luck

 

D

Barclaycard

S.A.R sent 18/01/07 :o

7 Day reminder 02/03/07

Some statements rec'd 19/03/07

ICO Complaint 20/03/06

 

Alea iacta est

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...