Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I found that the parkin attended has a car with CCTV camera on it, however as I stated earlier, it seems that he did not take video of my car otherwise they would have stated so in the SAR. parking car .pdf
    • The rules state that "approved devices may only be used in limited circumstances"  I was not a threat. I was not present. I did not drive away. I think he has not fulfilled the necessary requirements justifying issuing me a PCN by post therefore the PCN was issued incorrectly and not valid.  What are your thoughts?  
    • I have also found this:  D.2 Service of a PCN by post: 54) There are some circumstances in which a PCN (under Regulation 10) may be served by post: 1) where the contravention has been detected on the basis of evidence from an approved device (approved devices may only be used in limited circumstances) 2) if the CEO has been prevented, for example by force, threats of force, obstruction or violence, from serving the PCN either by affixing it to the vehicle or by giving it to the person who appears to be in charge of that vehicle 3) if the CEO had started to issue the PCN but did not have enough time to finish or serve it before the vehicle was driven away and would otherwise have to write off or cancel the PCN 55) In any of these circumstances a PCN is served by post to the owner and also acts as the NtO. The Secretary of State recommends that postal PCNs should be sent within 14 days of the contravention. Legislation states that postal PCNs must be sent within 28 days, unless otherwise stated in the Regulations. This from London Councils Code of Practice on Civil Parking Enforcement.  The question is what is an approved device? Certainly, he had the opportunity to place the ticket on my car and I didn't drive away.  I looked further and it seems that an approved device is a CCTV camera - It seems that the photos taken were not actual film but images and it is not clear if they are taken from a video or are stills. I'm guessing if it was moving images then the SAR would have stated this.    From the Borough of Hounslow website: "There are two types of PCN issued under the Traffic Management Act 2004, which governs parking contraventions. The first is served on-street by a Civil Enforcement Officer, who will observe a vehicle and collect evidence before serving the PCN either by placing it in a plastic wallet under the windscreen wiper, or by handing it to the driver. The second is a PCN served by post, based on CCTV footage taken by an approved device, which has been reviewed by a trained CCTV Operator."   From Legislation.gov.uk regarding approved devices: Approved Devices 4.  A device is an approved device for the purposes of these Regulations if it is of a type which has been certified by the Secretary of State as one which meets requirements specified in Schedule 1. SCHEDULE 1Specified requirements for approved devices 1.  The device must include a camera which is— (a)securely mounted on a vehicle, a building, a post or other structure, (b)mounted in such a position that vehicles in relation to which relevant road traffic contraventions are being committed can be surveyed by it, (c)connected by secure data links to a recording system, and (d)capable of producing in one or more pictures, a legible image or images of the vehicle in relation to which a relevant road traffic contravention was committed which show its registration mark and enough of its location to show the circumstances of the contravention. 2.  The device must include a recording system in which— (a)recordings are made automatically of the output from the camera or cameras surveying the vehicle and the place where a contravention is occurring, (b)there is used a secure and reliable recording method that records at a minimum rate of 5 frames per second, (c)each frame of all captured images is timed (in hours, minutes and seconds), dated and sequentially numbered automatically by means of a visual counter, and (d)where the device does not occupy a fixed location, it records the location from which it is being operated. 3.  The device and visual counter must— (a)be synchronised with a suitably independent national standard clock; and (b)be accurate within plus or minus 10 seconds over a 14-day period and re-synchronised to the suitably independent national standard clock at least once during that period. 4.  Where the device includes a facility to print a still image, that image when printed must be endorsed with the time and date when the frame was captured and its unique number. 5.  Where the device can record spoken words or other audio data simultaneously with visual images, the device must include a means of verifying that, in any recording produced by it, the sound track is correctly synchronised with the visual image.
    • Hearing took place today.  Case dismissed with costs awarded. Neither UKPC or a representative turned up.  Apparently they messaged the court on 7 May asking for their case to be considered on paper.  Never informed me, which was criticised by the judge as not following procedure.  I was really annoyed as I would have preferred for the case to be thrown out before the hearing, or at least face them in court and see them squeal.   They are just playing a numbers game and hope you blink 1st!   Ended up having to change my flight, but  the costs awarded softens the blow. Was asked to confirm it was my signature on both the witness statement and supplementary statement.  Wasn't asked to read them, said she could see my arguments made and the signs were insufficient and no contract formed. Took maybe 10 mins in total.  Judge did most of the talking and was best for me just to keep quiet or confirm any statements made. Happy to have won as a matter of principle and have costs awarded. Maybe not worth all the time and hassle for any newbies or the technologically challenged.  But if you are stubborn like me and willing to put in the time and effort, you can beat these vultures! I big shout out to everyone who helped on the thread with their advice and guidance, special mention to FTMDave, thank you sir!  Really appreciate everyone's efforts. All the best!
    • I plan to be honest to avoid any further trouble, tell them that the name should be changed to my official name
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What can DCA's actually do?


mekcuf
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6358 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Can anyone provide a definitive answer (or weblink), with regard to what DCA's can and cant do

 

From reading this site and others, I get the impression that they can to do much apart from bluster and threaten- is this really the case

 

I owe Lloyds 2000 pound, wife received letter the other day ( I am in Saudi Arabia), from a Private Detective/Tracing agency saying pay up, or they will obtain a Statutory Demand- my wife called them and told them I am not there, they said they will send someone round, etc- she was frightened by this , I told her to tell them to B****r off if they did call.

 

I will write to them when I get home, (the CCA letter)

 

This has made me more determined to pursue Lloyds for the bank charges they have ripped me off for over the last few years

 

Thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are working in Saudi then £2k shouldn't be a problem just pay it and shake Lloyds down for illegal charges when you get home. This will stop your poor wife from being harassed. If you are working in Saudi and £2k is a problem then I assume you are in some form of indentured labour for which these delightful people are so famous. Get help from the British embassy if this is the case.

"Why CCJ when you can CCA!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

2K is a problem right this moment, but wont be in a few months time

 

I am more concerned with the point relating to what DCA's can do

 

I have thought about writing to Lloyds directly, and offering to pay so much a month, rather then pay these parasites

 

Howver I can do nothing in the meanwhile as I am here, not home til Xmas

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCAs cannot actually do anything really, unless they get a judgement at court stage. This seems to be nowhere near that yet, so they may NOT force entry, may NOT 'bring a locksmith round'/'bring police round'/'send you to prison' etc.

However, your wife must do a couple of things to ensure her safety and the security of your home. If they do come knocking: she must never let them in, nor sign anything they give her. I'd refuse anyone who knocks and 'just wants to use your loo' too...:rolleyes: Get her to put a security chain on the door, but she shouldn't even open it to speak to them - letterbox or window on the first floor is best. Have her take a picture of whoever comes to collect (if they do).

If she is out, she MUST lock all doors and windows, even the top floor (Whistleblower showed one up a damn ladder trying to get in an open window). If she is in, then the bottom ones at LEAST should be locked.

If there is a car in your driveway, get your wife to put it in your locked garage or get used to parking a few streets away - DCAs have been known to clamp and threaten to tow as a way of extracting payment.

 

Have I forgotten anything, people?

 

Is it possible to get your wife online and on-site? Reading other peoples' experiences can be quite comforting, and she'd have immediate access to help in the chatroom or via PM if anyone does knock. If she's truly afraid, I'm sure someone in the area on here can offer to be a bailiff-buddy, and pop 'round if anyone's expected for moral support.

 

Edit: Just a thought - if you laid it on thick with Lloyds about the stress this has put your wife under, a 'nervous' lady living on her own having to deal with a very threatening phone call from heavy-handed collectors for a debt that is nothing to do with her, they may offer to take it back a little more easily - harrassment of debtors, along with demands of payment in full, contravenes the OFT's debt collection guidelines, and the OFT's starting to look more closely at companies doing so.

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll most probably be booed for this but i a work for a DCA myself (I'm one of those horrible people that phone you and say you owe us money, you need to pay now. I'm a nice person in real life though).

DCAs cannot force entry to your house in any way, shape or form. We are there to obtain the money but cannot seize goods of any kind. The only way to seize goods is to get a court order and for that court order to be ignored in which case they can send bailiffs round.

I would actually say that for a debt of 2K they most probably wouldn't go down the litigation route anyways (at least my company wouldn't) as it is far too expensive. They would most probably just carry on phoning.

What I would recommend is either yourself or your wife calling them and saying that you can't afford the full balance just now but maybe able to settle your account in a few months. in trhe meantime I can make payments of X amount each month so you can freeze any interest on the account. If that doesn't work tell them you will pay £1 a month until suach time you can clear the debt. This way if they try to take you to court for non-payment you can show that you were willing to pay the debt back even if it was only at £1 a month at the time.

Hope this helps

S.A.R SENT TO ABBEY 12/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCA's are class.

 

I work for a DCA and have done for two months now. DCA's can do very little else than threaten you, if they send someone arround the house you can tell them to F**K off, only a bailif can enter your propery with a courtorder after you have defaulted on a CCJ and even then he can't force entry.

 

Try and negotiate a discounted settlement with the DCA I will give a discount of 50% if a customer wants to settle, after all DCA's buy accounts for very little in the first place.

 

Come to an arrangement with the DCA and if that's still not acceptable send them a letter stating that they may no longer contact you by telephone and if they persist you can report them to the FSA and Oftel who will likely fine them for acting in contravention of the Debt Collection guidelines laid out by the FSA and also the calling guidelines as set out by Oftel.

 

It is also illegal for a DCA to threaten you with any action they do not have any intention of taking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can't do much legally, and I feel that the tactics most of them use such as insisting that you MUST pay NOW via continuous phone calls and visits is illegal harrassment, and if anything we should all be negotiating what amount of compensation they are willing to offer us pending legal action.

 

However a good tactic is to pay a few quid when you can DIRECTLY to the people you owe the money to, not to the DCA. Why? Because the creditor, such as Lloyds in this example, probably won't bother to write to the DCA telling them you have just paid them a fiver. You can then claim that the amount owed is in dispute as the DCA's figures will be incorrect. As such it would be improper of them to go ahead with court action, and 99 times out of 100 they probably won't risk it if there is a possibility that they will lose. Paying a bit off and using this tactic buys you more time if nothing else.

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to all for your responses

 

Will probably contact lloyds in the first instance, explain Ive been abroad, missed correspondence etc, and see what they say, would rather dela with lloyds then the DCA if I can help it

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been dealing with tsb and once i got beyond the call centre and started to deal with the collection people they were pretty reasonable. I had missed a couple of payments and they passed it onto their solicitors, i got in touch with tsb and they set me up on another plan. Call them they can only say no after all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...