Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
    • Speeding (Revised 2017) – Sentencing (sentencingcouncil.org.uk)  
    • upload sites dont retain copies and so what if they do... what do you think they are going to do, kidnap your grannies budgie or something..how the hell would any of the info required by us be of any use to them..... stop being paranoid and put them all in one mass multipage pdf.  
    • https://audicam.audi.co.uk/customer/6660055/00cc584e9769699ddba3807a2995032f/59022-13062024 Please let me know if you can access footage 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

backdoor Lowell CCJ now warrant - Old Vodafone debt - although last invoice Nil


Mopbucket
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1181 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

1) the defendant entered into an agreement with vodafone under account reference        .......** ('the agreement').    
         
2) the defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated.     

                             

3) the agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 30/08/2018 and notice given to the defendant.                               

 

4) despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £2,308.44 remains due and  outstanding.        

                         

and the claimant claims                      

a) the said sum of £2,308.44                 

b) interest pursuant to s69 county courts act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.506, but limited to one year, being £111.82           

c) costs   

Link to post
Share on other sites

£2300 for a mobile debt...!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And  £111.82  interest on what is most probably if not all, early termination's fees for a service charges they no longer provide or cost them.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

that must have been a very expensive 24mts? contract at its start to run up +£2k!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats the point the contract was terminated Nov16 to upgrade to new number and new account and line was supposedly turned off.

Who ever did upgrade did not turn off old account and seem to have carried on billing.

I have copies of last invoices no balance carried forward! 

 

If it is any help to others,  Northants bulk said they could cut & paste claim particulars and email. Which they did 👍

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have a SAR running to VF haven't you?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the account comms log should be interesting then...:pound:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You sorted the ones I spotted so I hope it's all ok now.

 

Just need to see what is thought about the data they've disclosed ............

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So now you have the SAR rsponse, use it to identify how the data and comms log ties in with the demands for payment that then led to the court claim made against you.

 

There's a suggestion that an old contract was allowed to run on when it should have been superceded with a new contract - you need to nail this identifying the old and new phone/account numbers, date the old contract should have ended, charges that accrued subsequently for monthly fees and late or penalty fees, etc.

 

You need to produce info to back up the assertion that the CCJ was based on incorrect data.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mop,

 

I only ran through the SAR looking for any personal data you left showing.

 

Get a pen and paper, go through the narratives and note down the date and anything relevant to what led to the debt or CCJ.

 

If there's little or nothing to do with the debt or CCJ, that in itself is important.

 

Do your best and come back with results.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do

 

dont understand  “f there's little or nothing to do with the debt or CCJ, that in itself is important.”


Narrative mentioned 6 x payments of £100  for payment plan but not £2.5k.


many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I meant was simply - visible info or data can be useful, but sometimes stuff that is missing can also be relevant.

 

Just do your best over the weekend.

 

Then come back with a summary of info that will help build a case to challenge the CCJ.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to backdoor Lowell CCJ warrant - Old Vodafone debt - although last invoice Nil

thread tidied.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to backdoor Lowell CCJ now warrant - Old Vodafone debt - although last invoice Nil

Dispute with Vodafone and get copy invoices last invoice 2016 no balance on old number

I have invoices upto nov16 showing no balance brought forward just before upgraded.

 

you say above you have all the bills that state a zero balance up until nov2016

are they in the SAR return too,? and all the ones after nov 2016?

 

the account number in the poc is this the same number as on those bills you have?

and the number on the pages of the comms log you uploaded?

as the comms log appears to show payments were being made right through the period you say the bills you have all show £0? then being transferred to other invoice numbers  , do these invoice numbers the payments were transferred too match the invoice numbers show £0 balance you have?

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 

 

Found some pdf old invoices which show that a debt all of a sudden was raised in January 2016 from £74.28 to £719.45 thereafter lots of one non recognisable charges. The Invoice style changed format, and billing number format (changed to a B7 prefix). I cannot see where the extra £640 came from and the plan changed. I note from the SAR the operator states there was an error in SAR states "error occurs open new profile".

 

Mobile Number  Date Plan Charge Overdue Balance
079*******7 20 March 2014 83.83 100.36 £184.19
079*******7 22 July 2014 92.91   £94.00
079*******7 22 June 2015 109.03   £130.00
079*******7 21 July 2015 56.24   £66.65
079*******7 20 August 2015 81.38   £149.85
079*******7 21 September 2015 55.14   £65.33
079*******7 20 October 2015 52.42   £62.07
079*******7 19 November 2015 58.2   £69.00
079*******7 22 December 2015 62.6   £74.28
079*******7 18 January 2016 63.73 686.72 £719.45
079*******7 18 February 2016   719.45 £838.27
079*******7 18 May 2016 162.5 1185.97 £1,348.47
079*******7 18 August 2016 56.5 1353.63 £1,513.37
079*******7 18 October 2016   1499.15 £1,534.63
079*******7 18 November 2016   1534.63 £1,585.05
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 28/02/2021 at 03:06, dx100uk said:

is the account number in their poc is this the same number as on those bills you have?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

seems to confirm then that they didn't close off the old mobile account upon takeup of the new one then.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 06/02/2021 at 13:47, fkofilee said:

Arh the Ye Olde Folk Law Of Crystal To Siebel Migration... 

Did you DSAR Voda? I would suggest doing it now., 

If the debt is found to be incorrectly calculated then you could potentially get a set aside at Lowell's cost if they agree with it. (Hmmmmm...)

 

Let us know what actions you have taken to get info from Voda.

 

they'll ignore you i bet

set aside via an n244 to the court but you need to prove this was as was assumed earlier 

 

@fkofilee your expertise is badly needed.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The plot thickens

 

I have a screen shot of earlier invoice B7-99496*40 with same account number showing £50.42 no balance brought forward.

 

However, based on the invoices as sent to my wife 7/11/19 after I complained to Resolver and CEBR the same invoice in different format.

 

Surely they would legally would have legally been required to credit and rebill not just revamp on old invoice number?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Multipage blanked.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...