Backdoor capquest 2007 CCJ for old CAp1 Debt being chased by Capquest now resolvecall

[dx100uk]

sadly a CCJ 

1 stops the SB clock

2. is not part of the limitation act as its a court judgement.

 

however, failure to enforce a CCJ within 6yrs makes it very difficult for them do so and ofcourse would have to return to court the court via your objection would no doubt refuse them.

 

it's just some phone jocky trying their luck that you might be a mug and fund their xmas party drinks bill.

 

IMHO you need do nothing 

did you give them your current and correct address?

 

[dx100uk]

its an extremely stupid idea to go off radar 

thats why you got this CCJ

 

other than informing them of you correct address in WRITING 

there is nothing else you need to do or state.

 

i have never known an enforcement hearing to succeed on a CCJ outside of 6yrs that has to date not been already enforced BUT as the court wont know your address ...it might well succeed.

 

it is a very stupid idea to run away from debts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[dx100uk]

good

however i was reading your old thread 

Advice to move forward in life...... - Debt management and Debt self-help - Consumer Action Group

particularly post 8 

 

pers i'd  write simply informing them legally of your correct and current address.

ref their ref number xxxx

 

then you are bullet proof

 

dx

 

 

 

[dx100uk]

nope said 3 times what to do and not.

should they try , the court will write first.

as long as the debt owner has your correct and current address.

but i've never heard of it for a ccj of that age.

dx

[dx100uk]

you dont converse at your door.

you simply film them with your phone and tell them to leave your property and never return else you'll call police 101

not a good idea to start silly letter tennis by whatever means ever with any dca.

next time simply report the txt to 7726.

dx

[dx100uk]

i would seriously suggest this is your old capquest backdoor ccj debacle as resolvecall do most of their work for capquest.

now it would be funny, whilst filming to actually ask what it was about and i bet the 1st thing he will state is there is a ccj against you that is unsettled, as that will make him believe he has some magical power over you that the court doesnt have but he does to collect money.

they are always total chancers and will be empowered in his mind s eye by the old CCJ..hoping that people dont know a dca is not a bailiff , and hell get free money for the pub tonight.

id love to see his reaction when told he is not a bailiff and would you like me to call northants bulk court now and ask them have you been dispatched mr xxx to demand money from me.

[dx100uk]

its not theory. it's the law.

a dca can NEVER enforce a CCJ at your door ..they are NOT and NEVER can be a BAILIFF

if they were the owner of a debt with an existing CCJ, they would have to return to court and ASK the judge to send court bailiff .

that after 6yrs is virtually impossible.

and if they did try the above anyway, the court would inform you of their request 1st before ever granting it. and you'd blow it out the water easily

[dx100uk]

you write to capquest.

stating clearly please note my correct and current address is.

no other address is to be written to, you must remove remove them from my file.

you must also remove all phone numbers for ANY address including any mobile phone numbers you have.

you must also remove all email address you have related to me.

you may only WRING to the above address, no other form of communication is to be used.

i request this under the CONC rules that you must operate under.

 

[dx100uk]

you dont deal with monkey's but the organginder.

id 100% guarantee its capquest.

RC must have a ref number on their whatever.

i bet that matches the old capquest one.

 

 

[dx100uk]

how do we know eh? you are the one with all the unredacted letters etc from the above..

dx

 

 

 

[dx100uk]

writing. 

inc a screen print of the resolvecall text.

dx

[dx100uk]

did they supply a ref number then?

why the without pred?

not ever needed.

i refer you to conc

you dont request you DEMAND

dx

 

 

[dx100uk]

thanks for telling us you already knew it was your old cap1 CCJ...

it cant be statute barred for your info as i said in post 7......

doesnt matter what the debt, if you last used it or paid in say 7yrs you must always inform the debt owners.

even more so with an outstanding ccj. you've been lucky here they've not gone behind your back to try and enforce it.

they know its now a lemon debt and can do nothing about it other than hope you fall for a powerless door stepper that has zero legal powers.

 

 

[dx100uk]

threads merged ..title updated

[dx100uk]

dont mess with monkey's only the organ grinder ever..the debt owner,  the claimant, the one with a default judgement from a COURT.

if people want to pay attention to what silly powerless DCA's write and believe thats their problem.

 

[dx100uk]

original creditors dont do court. and even if they did, they would NEVER not find your correct address first.

a favourite trick of any dca...

the court would write as i said (do you not re read your threads before posting?) 

but its certainly no dice as the CCJ is now +16yrs old..

 

[dx100uk]

there is no such thing as removal of implied rights.

its all a load of old twaddle that sadly did the rounds on here for many a moon until it was blown out the water as freemen of the land BS.

seriously just forget about this 

weve now spent 47 posts going round in circles

[dx100uk]

you are unnecessarily worrying about noting. 

it doesnt matter if RC show, it changes nothing eitherway

we've simply advised you how to deal with them if they do,

that advice has not changed since you started this thread and were advised what to do .

 

[dx100uk]

all done to spook people into thinking a debt is going up some kind of imaginary chain.

of course as you know the bottom line is no DCA has any more power than the previous one nor their client DCA.

they are ALL totally legally POWERLESS.

dx