Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • He wasn't and isn't transferring any funds overseas.  It was 1 small transfer - ironically to me (which he'd done before) - and 2 small ATM withdrawals.  He has a 300/d limit on the card. And can't transfer more than 2k at a time.  This happened a number of months ago. And he isn't able to call the bank from overseas due to health issues.  He's getting his pension monthly (which I set up for him) and he can't access it.  It's a sad state of affairs
    • the RK on a cars v5c is not necessarily the owner nor the driver of a car as long as the person driving is insured it matters not. the bottom line is the VIN Number if push comes to shove that proves without doubt that they are indeed 'the same car' i seriously doubt you'd be that unlucky during the short period this might extend over till sorted.  
    • Sorry but please could you post your documents in a single PDF – multipage single file format. You have seen other witness statements that we want them presented in broadly the same way   Have you read what we have to say about preparing your court bundle?
    • Please will you post up a copy of the claim form in PDF format. If you have difficulty then click upload for some advice is how to do it. It will be helpful if you could just be a little bit more careful about the information you are giving us. What information are you expecting "pre-action"? Please post up the text of the email in which he threatens you with action if you don't respond within 72 hours. Let's also see the email which apparently he sent you complaining that he wasn't happy et cetera…. He said that there are no photos. This means that you don't have any photos? Or that he hasn't any photos? We can help you with this but you are going to have to be a little bit more careful and also responsive. I'm sure you have other things to do it has been 15 hours since we asked you questions and you have come back and responded but not particularly interest the questions we have put to you.  
    • are you defo sure with the wrong name it can be put on my car but not end up with a v5 thats assign to the private plate with arnold when im not that name   last time i had a crash they wanted to see my v5 to make sure its in my name
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Backdoor capquest 2007 CCJ for old CAp1 Debt being chased by Capquest now resolvecall


Recommended Posts

sadly a CCJ 

1 stops the SB clock

2. is not part of the limitation act as its a court judgement.

 

however, failure to enforce a CCJ within 6yrs makes it very difficult for them do so and ofcourse would have to return to court the court via your objection would no doubt refuse them.

 

it's just some phone jocky trying their luck that you might be a mug and fund their xmas party drinks bill.

 

IMHO you need do nothing 

did you give them your current and correct address?

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its an extremely stupid idea to go off radar 

thats why you got this CCJ

 

other than informing them of you correct address in WRITING 

there is nothing else you need to do or state.

 

i have never known an enforcement hearing to succeed on a CCJ outside of 6yrs that has to date not been already enforced BUT as the court wont know your address ...it might well succeed.

 

it is a very stupid idea to run away from debts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Backdoor CCJ for old CAp1 DEbt being chased by Capquest after 13 years

good

however i was reading your old thread 

Advice to move forward in life...... - Debt management and Debt self-help - Consumer Action Group

particularly post 8 

 

pers i'd  write simply informing them legally of your correct and current address.

ref their ref number xxxx

 

then you are bullet proof

 

dx

 


 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope said 3 times what to do and not.

should they try , the court will write first.

as long as the debt owner has your correct and current address.

but i've never heard of it for a ccj of that age.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

you dont converse at your door.

you simply film them with your phone and tell them to leave your property and never return else you'll call police 101

not a good idea to start silly letter tennis by whatever means ever with any dca.

next time simply report the txt to 7726.

dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would seriously suggest this is your old capquest backdoor ccj debacle as resolvecall do most of their work for capquest.

now it would be funny, whilst filming to actually ask what it was about and i bet the 1st thing he will state is there is a ccj against you that is unsettled, as that will make him believe he has some magical power over you that the court doesnt have but he does to collect money.

they are always total chancers and will be empowered in his mind s eye by the old CCJ..hoping that people dont know a dca is not a bailiff , and hell get free money for the pub tonight.

id love to see his reaction when told he is not a bailiff and would you like me to call northants bulk court now and ask them have you been dispatched mr xxx to demand money from me.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its not theory. it's the law.

a dca can NEVER enforce a CCJ at your door ..they are NOT and NEVER can be a BAILIFF

if they were the owner of a debt with an existing CCJ, they would have to return to court and ASK the judge to send court bailiff .

that after 6yrs is virtually impossible.

and if they did try the above anyway, the court would inform you of their request 1st before ever granting it. and you'd blow it out the water easily

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you write to capquest.

stating clearly please note my correct and current address is.

no other address is to be written to, you must remove remove them from my file.

you must also remove all phone numbers for ANY address including any mobile phone numbers you have.

you must also remove all email address you have related to me.

you may only WRING to the above address, no other form of communication is to be used.

i request this under the CONC rules that you must operate under.

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you dont deal with monkey's but the organginder.

id 100% guarantee its capquest.

RC must have a ref number on their whatever.

i bet that matches the old capquest one.

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

how do we know eh? you are the one with all the unredacted letters etc from the above..

dx

 

 

 

  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

writing. 

inc a screen print of the resolvecall text.

dx

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

did they supply a ref number then?

why the without pred?

not ever needed.

i refer you to conc

you dont request you DEMAND

dx

 

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for telling us you already knew it was your old cap1 CCJ...:evil:

it cant be statute barred for your info as i said in post 7......

doesnt matter what the debt, if you last used it or paid in say 7yrs you must always inform the debt owners.

even more so with an outstanding ccj. you've been lucky here they've not gone behind your back to try and enforce it.

they know its now a lemon debt and can do nothing about it other than hope you fall for a powerless door stepper that has zero legal powers.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Backdoor capquest 2007 CCJ for old CAp1 Debt being chased by Capquest now resolvecall

threads merged ..title updated

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont mess with monkey's only the organ grinder ever..the debt owner,  the claimant, the one with a default judgement from a COURT.

if people want to pay attention to what silly powerless DCA's write and believe thats their problem.

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

original creditors dont do court. and even if they did, they would NEVER not find your correct address first.

a favourite trick of any dca...

the court would write as i said (do you not re read your threads before posting?) 

but its certainly no dice as the CCJ is now +16yrs old..

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no such thing as removal of implied rights.

its all a load of old twaddle that sadly did the rounds on here for many a moon until it was blown out the water as freemen of the land BS.

seriously just forget about this 

weve now spent 47 posts going round in circles

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are unnecessarily worrying about noting. 

it doesnt matter if RC show, it changes nothing eitherway

we've simply advised you how to deal with them if they do,

that advice has not changed since you started this thread and were advised what to do .

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

all done to spook people into thinking a debt is going up some kind of imaginary chain.

of course as you know the bottom line is no DCA has any more power than the previous one nor their client DCA.

they are ALL totally legally POWERLESS.

dx

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...