Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Clarion Housing - Service charges went from £830 to £1,242.


Recommended Posts

I haven't yet.

I ended up emailing them so many times, and the only responses I get are "Someone will contact you" which never happens.

They're not even sending me supporting evidence of the service charges which is a legal requirement which they've breached.

They're not going to send me anything I ask for but doesn't mean I wont try. 

Thinking the same SAR, but as above, I've been sending them so many emails and calling them, even speaking at the residents meeting in front of councillors and Clarion staff , the CEO's assistant assured me they were looking into the complaint and I would get a response in 10 days time. That will be by the 29th.

If I don't hear anything, I will make a sar request, and also contact our MP.

I already have SHAC (shaction.org) very interested in this. 

We get the actuals every September which shows how much they actually spent. I keep everything and went through all previous years, only this year have they made this cockup. I did call their accounts team to ask how much will be charging me, they said £125.54 per week which was the old amount.

I told them my new revised letter says £111.60, they said they don't know anything about that and said someone from the service charges team will call me back that was 5 days ago. I was tempted to cancel my direct debit and only pay the amounts I have, but it may be better to see what they actually charge me. 

Just to reiterate, I requested supporting documents, invoices and receipts for the 2019/2020 service charges well over a month ago, they've committed an offence by not providing me with this, at this point, they've not been able to prove to me that any of the amounts are correct.

I'm sure they're still overcharging, they know they've messed up, and refuse to do anything more about it other than correct the three charges I complained about, for me only, and not for the other 500+ properties here. 

Oh and I don't know if this changes anything, but my tenancy ends in October 2021, my contract says I need to vacate unless they extend it. We're worried they may not extend it because of all this hassle we're giving them and we will have to move. 

Lastly, our tenancy agreement actually doesn't say if we have fixed or variable, they never filled in that page. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

look back at post #18 by stu007. Contains a lot of useful information.

 

The issue here, could be that the tenants in the development where you live,  have different service charges depending on whether they are Housing Association tenants or they may be buying the property through shared ownership scheme.

 

And in your area I would think Clarion manage lots of different developments, so it is quite possible that with the huge amount of admin that is involved, that they have issued documents containing mistakes.

 

If you have a document stating that your total housing will be £111.60 per week, then that should be what you pay.

 

The other possible issue might be rent free weeks and the service charges are therefore spread over fewer weeks.  But normally rent free weeks are for either 2 or 4 weeks of the year, so not sure this would cause the increase.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I will look at the post again.

The tenants I'm speaking to are housing association tenants just like myself, they have very similar charges to the ones I were getting which they admitted over charging on, there is no way a tenant should be paying £300 a year for communal water alone

for example, when every year it has been around £4, and they have admitted to me that the £300 figure was a computer error and have corrected mine back to the lower figure. It's only right they should be correcting everyone's but no one I have spoken to has received a service charges letter other than ourselves. We have a Facebook group with 100's of members so I regularly post about this on that group. 

The mistakes are because the person who made the changes literally just changed some of the fields in an excel spreadsheet without calculating totals. The other values are the same as the old service charges letter.

We don't have any rent free weeks. 

Just re-read Stu's post, that's absolutely correct, we shouldn't be paying for a great deal of these charges as stated in the Landlords and Tenants act 1985 (section 11). We're certainly not a leaseholder, our tenancy is 5 years at a time. 

Furthermore, they've left the section in our tenancy agreement about which service charges we need to pay blank. A second document provided to us suggests it's variable however. 

Attaching the entire service charges letter (the latest one), please let me know if I should scan any other documents that may help with this. 

 

REDACTED (01-04-2021) Received 20 April 2021. April 2021 Revised Service Charges.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

stop faffin around give the people that might know everything you remotely think is relevant

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheap as chips now.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't wait for them get your SAR Request into them now do not wait for a response get it sent and also make sure and ask for those policies I mentioned.

 

As for them saying it is a computer error no it isn't as it was a human that input that data so it was the staff member that put that incorrect data in not the computer, typical excuse.

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

The section adding up to £125.54 contains obvious errors. They have added year before amount to estimate amount for current year.   If £125.54 includes anything towards personal charges towards your own flat and not a communal charge, then you need to ask Clarion. 

 

You should be charged the £111.60 per week as the standard amount , as I cannot see any reason to be charged more. For social Housing tenants that would represent the increase Housing Associations are allowed to charge these tenants. However, if you are required to pay a top up amount towards own flat individual personal service charges, then this may be why they state £125.54.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

As for the new letter I would still refer back to my Post#18 (why are you paying an Admin Fee that's a No No you pay for that in your rents that's just one my list says it all I would expect that of Homeowners/Shared Owners/Leaseholders NOT a HA Tenant).

 

I would have expected this to have been calculated in the HA Business Plan for the next Financial Year which is how they calculate what your HA Rent Increase is going to be for that FInancial Year.

 

You need to request the policies I mentioned and to get a SAR into them ASAP.

 

At least with that new letter you have the actual name of the individual who is the 'Head of Rents & Service Charges'.  

 

Also inform anyone else affected by this to do exactly the same as they wil also need to do the same thing to challenge them

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I have seen, Housing Associations in England do include a small admin fee for administering the standard services provided to tenants. But this is usually less than £2 per week.

 

For home owners and shared ownership tenants the admin fees tend to be much higher.

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a call from Clarion (of which I have recorded of course).

It was someone from their complaints team who gather the initial information for a complaint.

He said the complaint was put in their system on the 20th April, not the 14th of March which is when I sent the email titled "Official Complaint".

The 20th of April was when I received the last "Revised service charges" letter, which to no one's surprise, they can't find a copy of on their system. 

Tomorrow they will email me and ask me to go into detail about the whole complaint to which I will include a timeline showing how many times they have ignored my emails and calls

. It will also give me a chance to query whether or not I should be paying for half of these charges as a tenant (thanks Stu). 

I will of course ask for the policy documents, and I will send a SAR in as soon as I can. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Policies you now want etc are:

 

Complaints Policy (not the leaflet)

Rent & Service Charge Policy (not the leaflet)

Customer Care Charter/Standards Policy (not the leaflet)

Communications Policy (not the leaflet)

Cyclical Maintenance Policy (not the leaflet)

Estate Management Policy (not the leaflet)

Procurement Strategy/Policy (not the leaflet)

Repairs & Maintenance Policy (not the leaflet)

Health & Safety Policy (not the leaflet)

Fire Safety Policy (not the leaflet)

Copy of your Tenancy Agreement

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent detailed timeline of communication as well as in detail my whole complaint, and other issues that have arisen as a result. Requested all the policy documents in #38. Not sent the SAR just yet. 

They've started taken payments based on the initial incorrect service charges amount,  not even the reduced amounts shown on my latest service charges letter. 

Have been speaking to an action group, who are putting together a dossier regarding service charges from housing associations, they see this case as a strong case, and have gotten the interest of ITV and possibly the BBC.

I don't know if at this point it would be a good idea to go as far as an interview on a news segment.

Would it be best to wait for the outcome of the complaints process?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Clarion Housing - Service charges went from £830 to £1,242.

what happened?

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It fizzled out, they kept delaying the complaints process. In the end I believe they stopped charging me for a bunch of services, unsure if it was deliberate or a mistake so I stopped bringing it up. Ultimately we bought a house and moved out.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...