Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Annual Bonus


frazeeay
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6622 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Is your friend willing to put this on record?

I have no idea but i will ask her only thing is she doesn't have internet acess at home. I have given her this wesite to look at whilst at work though so she may do anyway. She no longer works in banking, RBS treated her like a dirt so she found another job and told them to stick it.

Lloyds TSB -Settled in full 30/08/06 :)

Now whoes next :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is your friend willing to put this on record?

I have no idea but i will ask her only thing is she doesn't have internet acess at home. I have given her this wesite to look at whilst at work though so she may do anyway. She no longer works in banking, RBS treated her like a dirt so she found another job and told them to stick it.

Lloyds TSB -Settled in full 30/08/06 :)

Now whoes next :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
A friend of mine used to work for natwest and rbs she says that the charges are a way for the bank to make money so they can give free banking and it costs practically nothing to bounce a dd or cheque etc. She also said that in order to qualify for a credit card they used to give priority to those who had missed payments on other financial areas such as catalogues as it meant they could make more money out of them by way of penalty charge as the chances are a payment would be missed, and yes she said the charges are a penalty charge nothing more so the bank can profit from it. Also where LLoydstsb are saying some of the data cannot be given because it is help on a micro fiche (sp) she says you are entitled to this information and they cannont withold it.

 

Thats bullshit.

 

I worked for RBS. What youre friend probably MEANT was that rbs rank customers in risk terms.

 

10 is HIGH

1 is LOW

 

Low risk customers are those earning MASSIVE ammounts of money, and thus dont need any credit, loans, morgages etc. High risk is people who've defaulted loans, morgages or are with outside bodies e.g. greg pennington. The BEST clients to sell loans/credit to are around a 7, medium risk but still NEED credit.

 

Charges CAN be refunded, but dependant on track history e.g. have u been charged numerous times and always had them refunded? Charges are refunded at the employees discretion and thus if seen to be refunding far too many your job position may be questioned. It's a case of looking at the charges impartially and seeing if you believe them to be fair.

 

Also where LLoydstsb are saying some of the data cannot be given because it is help on a micro fiche (sp) she says you are entitled to this information and they cannont withold it.

 

She's correct in saying this, the data protection act states a customer can require ANY information on file regarding themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct. All information held on 'a relevant filing system' must be disclosed. See Smith v Lloyds in Library

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A friend of mine used to work for natwest and rbs she says that the charges are a way for the bank to make money so they can give free banking and it costs practically nothing to bounce a dd or cheque etc. She also said that in order to qualify for a credit card they used to give priority to those who had missed payments on other financial areas such as catalogues as it meant they could make more money out of them by way of penalty charge as the chances are a payment would be missed, and yes she said the charges are a penalty charge nothing more so the bank can profit from it. Also where LLoydstsb are saying some of the data cannot be given because it is help on a micro fiche (sp) she says you are entitled to this information and they cannont withold it.

 

Thats bullshit.

 

I worked for RBS. What youre friend probably MEANT was that rbs rank customers in risk terms.

 

10 is HIGH

1 is LOW

 

Low risk customers are those earning MASSIVE ammounts of money, and thus dont need any credit, loans, morgages etc. High risk is people who've defaulted loans, morgages or are with outside bodies e.g. greg pennington. The BEST clients to sell loans/credit to are around a 7, medium risk but still NEED credit.

 

Charges CAN be refunded, but dependant on track history e.g. have u been charged numerous times and always had them refunded? Charges are refunded at the employees discretion and thus if seen to be refunding far too many your job position may be questioned. It's a case of looking at the charges impartially and seeing if you believe them to be fair.

 

Also where LLoydstsb are saying some of the data cannot be given because it is help on a micro fiche (sp) she says you are entitled to this information and they cannont withold it.

 

She's correct in saying this, the data protection act states a customer can require ANY information on file regarding themselves.

 

I had an excellent credit rating up untill Feb/March last year. I had a LloydsTsb select account and a Business account. My charges go back to the 5 years previous. Lloyds Tsb NEVER refunded any of my charges as a goodwill gesture, not even the first time. Please don't swear at me i find it offensive!

Lloyds TSB -Settled in full 30/08/06 :)

Now whoes next :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My firend used to work for the Woolwich and provided you weren't always being charged they would refund thee charge incurred. When my friend worked there it was 2 refunds a year don't know if it is still the same but it seems quite reasonable

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heaven helps those who help themselves

 

Scans better in English - but then most things do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

in reply to the above on banks working on bonuses ,a barclays call centre worker rang in to gmtv this morning and said for every charge they dont refund they are given a bonus,obviously not in their interests to refund then

[/u]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bugger - I've been taking French lessons for bloody ages too.

 

(My partners family live in Switzerland and their kids (4 and 7) speak fluent English, French, German and a little Romanschc (sp))

 

It makes me feel very small.

 

Don't bother trying Thai Dave or you will have problems lol :D

Lloyds TSB -Settled in full 30/08/06 :)

Now whoes next :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember listening to a family conversation between my Swiss cousins in which the wife asked her husband a question in French, he said something to his daughter in German and she replied in Italian. I think they were just shoiwng off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember listening to a family conversation between my Swiss cousins in which the wife asked her husband a question in French, he said something to his daughter in German and she replied in Italian. I think they were just shoiwng off.

 

My son does this with his Thai girlfriend who is over here for a few months at the mo. They speak in half Thai half English and when my son realiased i understand perfectly what they are saying in Thai they switched to fillipino lol

Lloyds TSB -Settled in full 30/08/06 :)

Now whoes next :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It means that now you can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Pity you don't have much comment from those who actually work in Banks. All I've read so far is "a friend of mine used to work in ....." or " I USED to....."

 

I do currently work for a Bank, albeit not your regular High Street Bank. I know you'll have heard this before but did you read what you were signing up for? No, I thought not. The consumer never does, then cries "foul" when it all goes pear- shaped. Whether the terms and conditions are/were unfair or not, you are all grown-ups and can legally enter into a contract. If you signed without reading, and I'll bet this applies to 99% of you, what can I say?

 

At the end of the day, the Banks have a responsibility to their shareholders to return a profit - a fact of life of any large PLC. How it is made, from the shareholders perspective, is irrelevant, so if "fair" charges are implemented, and this impacts on the bottom line, profits will have to be made elsewhere. Whether this is by reduced returns on customer investments or the end of "free" banking - how does a £100 annual charge for your credit/debit card or a £0.50 charge for every cheque written sound?( Cheques: out-dated and another source of customer complaint, although customers seem happy enough with 3 day clearing when paying for groceries by cheque in Tescos a couple of days before payday!)

 

The Public has no idea what Banks have to do in terms of providing a service, fraud prevention, etc, etc. Try a couple of Google searches: Basel II, Sarbanes-Oxley, Corporate Governance, Anti-Money Laundering, Data Protection, Banking Anti-fraud and have a look at the FSA web site, not to mention the IT issues. The Good Fairy doesn't pay for it all!

 

All this and "treating the customer fairly". Have you ever worked with the public?? If you have then you know how hard it can be, a good few of them make a hobby out of complaining and, of course, are ALWAYS right!

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6622 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...