Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Marstons. Capital Contribution Order


HOWLER
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1232 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

can anyone help

what the heck do i do

i received in the post today a cco to the tune of £100,000 .

yes they found me guilty even tho the judge said it was rough justice and thought i wasnt.

i already paid £7000

but now this i am stunned.

Help please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter arrived today from marstons. 

Awarded don't know I will be in touch. 

 

5 hours ago, honeybee13 said:

Hi.

 

I'm sure people will be along to help later. Have you posted about this problem before please?

 

HB

 

No this is new. 

 

My wife owns our apartment. 

She is disabled

We are both pensioners with minimal savings. 

 

How do I raise 106 k. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Marstons. Capital Contribution Order
On 26/05/2020 at 16:44, Andyorch said:

Topic Title updated

 

Well obviously you cant......

When all this started I had to supply details of my income and my wife's income and savings. 

So I suppose it includes my wife's too. 

 

Personally if I sold all I own it would amount to £5k.

I don't own a car. 

No fancy stuff. 

Nothing. 

Can they force us to sell our retirement apartment. 

Do I need to apply for a council property. 

I am falling apart here. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Andyorch said:

Waiting for your upload.....who have you paid the £7K to already ?

 

 

No....read the advice already given.

Paid to marstons last year 2019

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

im sorry confused 

 

The letter i got today 

 

The verdict was delivered on friday 13th dec 2019 

sentenced wed 18th dec 2019 to the most lenient sentence of 2 years suspended .

 

The judge did not agree with the verdict but had to sentence me .

 

Are there any professional people available who would sort this for me .

 

Im at my witsend and dare not inform my family , i am already the bad grandpa .

 

one of my sons has disowned me already ,.

 

 

Marstons CCO Letter 22-05.pdf Marstons CCO Letter 24-12-19.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Capital assessments are based on the:

 

amount or value of the asset at the time of the application

outcome of checks carried out to protect against fraud

As with income assessments the partner's share of the equity is included in these calculations - unless there is contrary interest.

Just found the above in the law society website. 

So am I screwed. 

So confused. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Email sent today to both parties LAA and MARSTONS detailing all errors and asking them to sort it.

The ball is now in their court.

Thank you everyone , i will be in touch again as soon as i get a reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi folks

latest letter from marstons

 

Marston letter.pdf

 

I have only received the above reply from marston nothing as yet from the LAA.

they were copied in my email and i received a message saying it could take 2 weeks.

 

i find it funny that Marstons say they can take into account my wifes income and then begin to ask for more details of income . ???????

 

Do i wait for a LAA reply before i do anything further. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Email recieved today from LAA 
Looks like im screwed
The info they ask for was supplied last december. 
To:
  •  You
 
 
 

Dear Mr

 

Thank you for your email dated 1st June 2020.

 

I note your comments expressed regarding your Capital Contribution Order, ownership of the property  and financial assets held.

 

Having looked through our records I can confirm we have detailed your partner having 100% ownership of the property. Please be advised that, when assessing your liability, we can consider your partner's assets as your own. This is as per Regulation 4 of the Criminal Legal Aid (Contribution Orders) Regulations 2013 which states:

 

“Where an individual has a partner –

 

  1. In calculating the financial resources of the individual, the Director must treat the financial resources of the partner as the individual’s financial resources; and
  2. Any reference in these Regulations to the financial resources, financial circumstances, income or capital of the individual includes a reference to the financial resources, financial circumstances, income or capital of the individual’s partner. “

 

As such I must confirm that it is correct that your partner’s capital and equity has been included when assessing your liability for a Capital Contribution Order (CCO). I will now explain how your CCO has been calculated.

 

CCOs are calculated from disposable capital. This is the total of your joint capital and equity, less an allowance of £30,000. The amount of your Disposable Capital is £123, This figure has been calculated using the capital and equity figures that you declared on your application Legal Aid. The figures are as follows:

  • Equity in property: £150,000 (Property Value: £150,000, Mortgage Value: £0)
  • Capital (savings): £3,241 
  • Total Capital and Equity: £153,000
  • Disposable Capital (Total Capital and Equity, minus £30,000) = £123.000

 

Income and capital contributions are required to cover your Final Defence Costs (FDCs), this is the total of bills paid by the Legal Aid Agency to your solicitor and barrister. I can confirm that we have paid total FDCs of £112,. You have paid an income contribution of £5.6k leaving an outstanding balance of £106,. As your disposable capital exceeds this amount, you have been issued with a CCO to cover the remaining FDCs in full.

 

As advised above we are correct to include your partner’s equity when assessing your liability. As such, I must confirm that your CCO has been calculated correctly and cannot be reviewed at this time. As such you remain liable for the amount of £106,  

 

We can review your CCO if you disagree with the figures used. If you would like us to conduct a review of your CCO we will require the following information:

  • 2 x Independent non-internet based property valuations as at the time of conviction (December 2019).
  • Mortgage statement at the time of conviction (December 2019).
  • Copies of any charges registered against the property (Must be registered with and Registry)

 

When applying for Legal Aid you declared having £3, in capital but have since advised to have £390 in capital. I must advise you that a request for your capital evidence was sent on the 17th May 2019, however we have not received this evidence from yourself. Therefore, for each account held by yourself and your partner please provide the following:

  • 3 months consecutive bank statements up to the date of declaration (16th May 2019).
  • Recent bank statements showing the  current balance.
  • Clarification as to the reason for the change in capital value.

 

With regards to your income contribution, this was assessed using the Pension figures declared. If you believe the assessment is incorrect please do not hesitate to contact us advising of what errors you believe have been made. Please provide any evidence to support your claims. I have attached a copy of the means assessment to this email for your perusal.

 

Once you have obtained the above, please submit these to the National Crime Team as soon as possible.

 

I note your requests with regards to phone calls. Regrettably I must advise that we are unable to place a hold on your account and our agents will continue collection efforts. I would advise that you submit any evidence for a review as soon as possible. If you do not disagree with the figures we have used then I must advise that you remain liable and should contact our collection and enforcement agents, Marston Holdings Ltd, to arrange payment of the outstanding balance.

 

If you have any queries please do not hesitate to get in touch via the contact details below.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

Legal Aid Agency

 

Caseworker

National Crime Team

Fothergill House, 16 King Street, Nottingham NG1 2AS

Tel: 0300 200 2020 | Email: [email protected]

Follow us on Twitter @LegalAidAgency

 

 

Please please help .

i feel sick

what do i do next.

This will wipe out all we ever worked for 

Even the judge disareed with the guilty verdict and said it was rough justice.

i am so sick .

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The case dragged on and on because some guys were involved in money laundering of which I had no idea till court. 

I was a pawn in a bigger story. 

Some of em went down for 5 years. 

 

 

On 12/06/2020 at 13:33, honeybee13 said:

Do you mean the N244?

 

HB

Yes

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/06/2020 at 15:58, London1971 said:

Also worth adding this in from the same Article. Nobody is forced out of anywhere.  

 

The agency adds: ‘The LAA does not record the source of how applicants satisfy their liability. It should also be noted that the LAA currently do not enforce the sale of properties but instead secure a charge to ensure that if the applicant chooses to sell their property our debt becomes payable.’

Charming

 

 

On 12/06/2020 at 15:51, Andyorch said:

Cheered me up no end. Thanx. 

 

On 12/06/2020 at 14:24, London1971 said:

Then perhaps get your wife to make a phone GP appointment?  She can then have a confidential conversation about what's going on with her GP, and they will write the appropriate letter.

 

I have not told my wife of this it will kill her and cause so much bad feeling. 

I can't do that. 

I have an appointment with the doctor Monday to get a letter. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife had nothing to do with this matter. 

The property has been in her name for years. 

There was also no proceeds of crime as I never got paid. 

So how can they take 106k from my wife's asset. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, FTMDave said:

OP, surely you meant conviction in a CROWN COURT.  Is that right? 

Yes sir. 

 

THIS CONVICTION WAS IN A CROWN COURT. 

 

Let's not get mixed up. 😇🙏🙏🙏😭

Link to post
Share on other sites

I give up I cant handle this I am not capable. just not clever enough. verbally or otherwise.

 

just spoke to doctor who explained my notes are available on line for me to download if I wish to send them the information.

 

thanks very much 

I am at the end of mt tether I cant deal with this I am done in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

marstons are demanding £106855.51p as my final defence costs.

Sorry but i had to take time away from this . 

 

My wife and i are both on anti depressants my wife also takes an array of pain medication.

She is a cancer survivor (throat Cancer ) from 5 years ago .

she also cant walk unaided as she needs hips and knees replaced.

she is in receipt of P I P payments the top rate.

Also prolapsed disc in neck. 

 

We moved to an apartment 20 months ago to make it easier for her.

i am not the owner, nor part of, she has full ownership .

 

I have not been on any deeds for 10 years before moving here.

my wifes total savings are no more than 15k.

The car is a motability vehicle.

Any other Qs please ask.

 

Once again very sorry but i am not doing too good.

 

Very BIG THANK YOU to all for any help .

 

If anyone knows of a good lawyer to do letters for me i would be happy to pay. 

I don't have any savings but could raise a couple of grand if need be.

 

yes i made a mistake putting up the letters cos i didnt want my wife to catch me. so figures i got wrong. 

 

 

Marstons CCO Letter 22-05.pdf

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife paid off the mortgage and debts when we moved here , we have no liabilities .

 

The other guys were charged with money laundering i was not, mine was a lesser charge .

for me it was a debt collection job that went wrong....

and i got charged with conspiracy to kidnap though there was no kidnap

the bloke ran away into the arms of the local plod,

who then after some digging decided to go after the big guys for laundering charges.

 

Mine was a small part played on the fringes.

I was there to back up the bailiff in carrying out his employment. 

 

I tried to get my barrister to appeal but was told there was nothing to appeal on.

i got a polite go away and think you are lucky cos they all got time.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...