Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

VCS/DCB(L) PCN spycar capture - PAPLOC Now claimform - no Stopping in Restricted Zone - Bristol Airport ***Claim Dismissed***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1282 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You want a remote hearing, on the papers is a no no it  allows VCS to insert more lies you can't challenge.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

face to face.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's says that you can ask for the claim to be "deferred until after the current Covid-19 restrictions have altered sufficiently to permit a hearing which the parties attend in court", but I'm not sure how I give good enough reasons why I don't think a remote (phone, Skype etc) hearing would be OK...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't have to give a rock solid reason

the mere fact you don't want on the papers for whatever reason is your legal right, you are the defendant.

 

i wish only a face to face hearing as i wish to cross examine the evidence produced by the author of their witness statement.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

the court has gone ahead with a phone hearing regardless of my objections...

 

The ICO have responded to say that they are investigating a complaint about VCS unlawfully obtaining details from the DVLA - this came after the submission of defence - is it still possible to raise in the witness statement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well its it is face to face

it will be like zoom or skype.

 

you have a date?
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and when do VCS have to pay the fee by?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean november?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It says "Unless the claimant does by 4.00pm on the 11 December 2020 pay to the court the trial fee of £25.00 or file a properly completed application......then the claim will be struck out" - seems like an error to me as I assume it would normally be paid before the court date?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yea..

oh well.

so time to get moving on your WS

 

lots here already inc

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Wrote to the court about the fee date being after the hearing, and they admitted it was a mistake so it's now 13th November, statements by 16th, hearing 9th December.

 

I've made progress on my WS, but I assume if I leave it till last minute to send, I can find out if VCS actually pay the fee before I do (if them not paying the fee on time actually gets the case dismissed rather than postponed)

Link to post
Share on other sites

its far better to exploit you LiP status and await theirs before you file yours.

however

no harm in getting it ready and checked here.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

I've seen exhibit cover sheets mentioned on a few other threads - what do they need to include? Is it just a separator page before each exhibit itself with the exhibit number on it? Does it include the "title" of the exhibit too?

Link to post
Share on other sites

plenty of VCS witness statements here already

use our search top right

 

but yes thats the basic idea

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've done some reading and making some progress - should I replicate anything/everything that I've already submitted in my defence?

 

Also, I've seen a WS that includes a counter claim - should/can I include it? I didn't declare a wish to counterclaim on any of the MCOL/court paperwork.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you do not counterclaim in a WS , you can however mention costs in a sep letter

you don't repeat your defence

your WS is in support of the points you made in that, further expanding upon them and including relevant Exhibits where necessary

it is also used to pull a claimant WS apart point by point

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just paper

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was hoping to get some decent pictures of the signs at Bristol Airport ahead of the submitting my WS, but with lock down 2.0, I won't be able to. I've got a screen grab from Google Street View that shows one of the signs at an angle, but if anyone knows where I can get a better picture of the one attached, I'd be grateful - its the second sign on your left as you go in!

 

image.png.e0a36f5744be3ae91bace6497683ff4f.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

plenty of byelaw no stopping WS's here already.

 

the very important bit here is that byelaws override any civil parking contracts that might exist. 

byelaws breaches can't be adjudged in a county court.

 

 a breach of byelaws is an issue for a magistrates court and the byelaw authority and byelaws enforcement cannot be passed to a third party.

 

any money goes to the purse not to the authority nor any third party.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I've had a look through but not been able to find any with photos of the signs though, but I'll check again though.

 

In my WS, should I include specifics of the day - e.g. where the vehicle was, the fact it was only stationary for 11 seconds, not parked etc? I've seen those sort of details in some WS, but not others.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Relate the 11 second stop using a definition of parking, as in stopped and planning to remain there and leave the vehicle impossible as it was a no stopping area VCS have form for invoicing people stopped to let pedestrians cross at a pedestrian crossing on Airport roadsas well

 

In any case as No Stopping is a prohibition and Airport is under Bylaws, its not in VCS remit to demand anything from you.  Re read the thread and check on what ericsbrother has said also.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...