Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ordered online £600 Dyson V12 got £30 vacuum argos dont even sell in the box! now refusing all responsibilities


Nomso
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1665 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Ethel Street said:

Another thought, do make sure if you speak to them by phone that you record the call. It seems to me that the only way they could attempt to deny liability is by claiming that you are attempting to defraud them, ie you did receive the Dyson but you switched it for the R Hobbs. Absurd, I know, but if they are foolish enough even to hint that might be their rationale they are in a difficult legal position. But evidence is everything, a recording of the conversation is essential.

 

Read our customer services guide and implement the advice there

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your problem here is going to be that it is your word against theirs. Even with the credit card company, if you try to make the claim then Argos will simply say that you are trying to rip them off by substituting a cheap vacuum cleaner for the one which you ordered and which was actually delivered.

What will help you here will be to look around the Internet and try to find similar stories and to collect them up as screenshots and also the Internet links. If you are able to contact any of the people who have this experience then that would be very helpful to you as well. You may eventually find that you will have to threaten and then bring a court case. For this kind of money and for these circumstances I can imagine that Argos will be prepared to meet you in court which means that they will defend the case. Because it is your word against theirs, you will have to persuade the judge that it is more likely than not – 51% or better that you are telling the truth. If you can find similar stories and print them out and include them as part of your evidence – and particularly if you can persuade people to give you statements as to their own experience then this will probably swing it for you.

I have a feeling the on this forum we've had one or two similar examples although I don't know if it was from Argos or from other suppliers. I think you need to search the forum and see what you can find. If you do find threads with similar issues then please post the links here for everybody else to see.

Although you have the right to reject the goods within 14 days for any reason – assuming that you are purchasing is a consumer – or because the goods were not as described you have a right to reject the goods out of hand in any event, you may as well write to Argos and reject the goods formally and tell them the reason why. At least you have a paper trail and you can show that you've taken all reasonable steps to bring the problem to the notice of Argos and to assert your rights in the matter.

I suggest that you take photographs of the cleaner and also the packing and also try to put the cleaner back into the package in the way that you found it so that you can demonstrate that it fits correctly and that it was apparently securely packed.

If you find links to stories elsewhere on the Internet about similar problems then please post those links here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, that had passed me by.

I don't really understand why they have gone ahead to collect an item which they say they have no knowledge of. Have you had any further feedback about it? Have they offered to return it to you?

I think my main advice still stands that you should gather as much information as possible – as quickly as possible – relating to other similar instances especially to Argos – but in fact to any kind of online store and then use that as the basis of evidence for your claim. I think it's a very difficult situation

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long ago?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to ordered online £600 Dyson V12 got £30 vacuum argos dont even sell in the box! now refusing all responsibilities
1 minute ago, Nomso said:

It is part of Argos operating polices not to check returned items at the point of collection. I guess they find it cheaper. Or failing that, they find it easier to deny any wrongdoings. They are the big multi-million £££ institution anyway, out to trample innocent civilians

 

If you have evidence of this policy then it is extremely helpful to you. How do you know that this is their policy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very interesting of course but it is not the kind of hard evidence that you can use in court particularly and certainly not the kind of hard evidence which would make Argos put their hands up in order to avoid a legal action.

I think your position here is to gather as much information as possible and then if you feel that you are prepared to bring a small claim in the County Court, you should send them a letter of claim giving them 14 days to reimburse you money or else you will sue. On day 15, issue the claim. Don't bluff. Only make the threat if you are prepared to carry it out.

Unfortunately the newspaper article – which is helpful – is dated 2014. The case on this forum which I referred you to is later than that and that will be helpful to you as well. As I have said, you should look around the Internet and see if you can find other people complaining about the same kind of thing. Have you done this yet?

You could also read our customer services guide and then call them and engage them in conversation where you suggest that they must be fairly familiar with this kind of complaint – and if you're lucky a customer services person will make an unguarded comment that this is certainly true.

This kind of evidence will help you.

Although what you're saying is completely credible – your problem is to persuade a judge. For 600 quid Argus might decide to make a go of it and in which case I would reckon your chances of success at about 75% which is okay – but I normally prefer higher odds when I recommend people to take a legal action.

The risk for you is that you could lose your 600 quid, the claim fee, the hearing fee – and possibly the reasonable costs of travel if Argos decided to send somebody out.

The risk for Argos is that they will get a professional to do this so they will incur a load of costs which they won't be able to recover under the small claims rules and of course they risk losing. Only Argos will know the extent of this kind of fraud problem within their ranks – and it is unlikely that you will ever find out how bad that problem is. If they turned up in court then clearly you would ask them whether they are familiar with this kind of fraud – because you know the answer would be "yes". It would then be nice to ask them how many times a week to they get this kind of incident – but the problem is that you don't know the answer so it could be risky to ask them. The general rule is that you only ask questions that you know the answer to already. If they were to respond that they only get this kind of thing once a year then it would be very unhelpful to your case.

On the other hand, the only other explanation is that you have substituted the vacuum cleaners and you are trying to steal from them. This would be a serious thing for Argos to be suggesting. In a court case in front of the judge I would certainly ask Argos if they were suggesting that you were attempting to steal £600 from them. I can imagine they would be reluctant to answer and it wouldn't be worth pressing the question – but the point would be made in front of the judge.

I think you are going to have to make a personal assessment of the pros and cons of bringing an action. I'm sure these frauds go on and of course it would be very nice to see Argos taken down on this and the story published on this forum and also over social media and to your local press. You could make it clear to Argos that if they force you to bring a legal action then when you get your judgement – as you surely will – that you will make sure that the story is published in the papers.

This is an additional risk factor for Argos and they might prefer to settle.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...