Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK thank you very much. I will prepare my WS as you advise.  I will indeed be preparing the WS over the weekend. I will also post UKPC's on Wednesday by 2nd class mail. As they have until the 17th to pay the court fee, is it possible they might discontinue at that stage too? Also I wanted to ask, in what form should the site manager's statement come? And the site owner if i can contact them? I will get photos of the signage to share with you also. Thank you.
    • Theres speculation on whether the magazine was Womens Weekly or Boys own 😀   ... probably a classic first edition of boys own - based on it costing $130k :lol  
    • You have five days yet to respect the WS deadline which is next Wednesday.  As others have said,  you can e-mail the court their copy.  That gives you the whole weekend to get the WS prepared.  Personally I'd post UKPC's theirs by 2nd class post (all they are worth) on Wednesday too, the court won't look badly on a short delay from a Litigant-in-Person. Another point.  In your WS you say their signs are rubbish.  That's a great point if their signs really are rubbish.  It's a dreadful point if their signs are fine.  So have you got photos of their signs?
    • You need to start drafting your WS.  I would suggest as sections - Sequence of Events - a brief description of how you came to get the invoice. Permission from Landowner - self-explanatory.  You will have to include this as it is in your defence.  However, be aware that your argument is very weak and indeed harms your case.  A person with no connection to the car park said you could park there - that is no different from saying that someone you met in the local pub said you could park there.  Anyway, get the site manager's WS.  Obviously this weak point could morph into a winner if you could get a WS from the landowner. Prohibition - you have this virtually word for word in the other WS. No locus standi - UKPC are not the landlord, they only administer the car park, they have no right to sue you (however the fact you never asked by CPR to see their contract with the landowner makes this a very weak point too). Double Recovery - again in the other WS.
    • And don't be worrying too much about being a day or two late with your WS. As a litigant in person, you'll be given a little leeway. Take time to post up your WS here  for the team to take a look. It'll give time to get your site manager's statement as an exhibit. Also, I understand you haven't got their WS yet? It could give you time to see theirs first if they send it. Do they have your email address? If so they could play dirty and send it the night before the hearing!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Intrum/beever PAPLOC - first direct [HSBC] Managed loan [card debt rolled into OD} **SUCCESS**


BillyBobBobson
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1682 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Looking for a lil advice here if possible.

 

Back in 2015, I had a First Direct, bank account and credit card.

got into financial difficulty and was making minimum token payments on the card and overdraft.

 

Out of the blue and without any warning, at the back end of 2015 my debit card and internet banking logins stopped working.

I was left stranded 50 miles from home and had to call up my sister to pick me up.

 

When I contacted First Direct they advised that they have closed my accounts and that further details would follow in a letter, refused to elaborate further over the phone.

 

A few weeks later, I received a letter from First Direct, which was simply a credit card statement, that has one only transaction "PAYMENT - THANK YOU" for the full balance and the credit limit reduced to £0. No further letters from First Direct at all since then.

 

I called up First direct again, only to be told again, the accounts are closed and further details will follow in a letter, but none arrived.

In the following months I received a few letters from Moorcroft Debt Recovery, for the value of the overdraft + credit card balance lumped together.

Granted, I did bury my head in the sand at the time and forgot about it,

 

 

until December 2016, a year later, when I received a letter from 1st Credit, advising that the account had been sold to them.

 

So, since that time, I've been back and forward with Intrum, trying to get more info.

 

Feb 2017, requested formally further information from 1st Credit. No response received.

 

Sept 2017, I made a CCA agreement to 1st Credit (was renamed to Intrum in 2018). NOTHING for 9 months, until July 2018, they eventually sent a faded copy of the agreement, nothing else.

 

So after another ignored letter in August, come November 2018 I served a SAR on both First Direct and Intrum.

Both replied sending statements etc.

Blank badly photocopied agreements...

However, NO DEFAULT NOTICE and no further details as to why they closed the account.

The statements simply shows "PAYMENT - THANK YOU" and zero balances.

 

I further pushed Intrum to supply default notices, obviously it was never received, and they confirmed a few months ago that they couldn't provide one, only a template "formal demand" letter

 

Now, today, I received a LBA from Moon Beever, their solicitors, advising they intend on filing an application to the courts.

 

Where do I stand here.

First Direct never defaulted me nor have they ever provided any form of correspondence explaining why they closed the accounts so abruptly.

Is it lawful for them to put an overdraft and a credit card debt together into the same debt and try to enforce it?

 

Thanks,

 

Billybob

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect you are suffering from ye ole HSBC managed loan syndrome.

typically they took all your debts , turned then into a fictitious loan

then dumped that into your bank account 

giving huge OD that you never asked for and HSBC never gave you.

 

easy to defend thankfully in most cases.

 

can we confirm this PAP LOC is for the OD @ £1000's or the credit card?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like they've lumped the credit card into the current account and then closed it. But Intrum dont refer to it as an OD, or CC in any way. They just simply say "account" (?)

 

The last statement for the credit card, simply shows "PAYMENT - THANK YOU" for the total balance which was ~£1300.

The last current account statement shows a payment to the CC account for the balance on the same day. Then immediately after "TRF TO HSBS RS" payment (OD + CC Balance).

Edited by BillyBobBobson
Link to post
Share on other sites

so no account number on the PAP LOC?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

devil is in the detail eh?

 

so follow this:

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So, I sent the completed form directly to Moon Beever on the 11th with proof of delivery, however as yet still havent had any response or acknowlegement. 

Would it be worthwhile giving them a call to confirm they received it, or should I sit on my hands?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yours is not the next move

And no matter the reason

You never ring a powerless dca nor their dogs

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Success. Letter received this morning;

 

”We refer to your recent request for documentation under section 77-79 of the consumer credit act. We have contacted the original creditor, HSBC Bank plc and they have confirmed that they are currently unable to provide this documentation.”

 

Goes on to say they accept they are not permitted to take enforcement action and the account is placed on hold indefinitely until such a time that HSBC can provide the documents. They do offer me a discount tho 😂 

 

Thanks for your help, is very muchly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Intrum/beever PAPLOC - first direct [HSBC] Managed loan [card debt rolled into OD} **SUCCESS**
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...