Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help - LB A/C advice needed please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1524 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks ethel and stu007

 

Yes, we had the kerb double dropped so me and my partner can park off the road. Before , just had one, and idiot would park in middle of properties so couldn't fit two cars on road outside. Has been issued a good 3 or 4 PCNs for obstructing since done. Its the back of the car, sometimes as far as a wheel but has a long boot/bumper which hangs over, so its not fully over. Recently seems to be as far as can without getting a ticket.

 

CCTV - shall read up thanks. Oh also, when I say 5 CCTV, that is 4 on property (100% out of boundary) and 1 in car which is lit up all night.

 

Does this count as harassment?

  1. The initial start of this thread, about 6 threatening letters asking me to pay for vehicle damage or court (nothing came of this)
  2. The constant parking annoyance (going on a couple of years)
  3. The loud music, witnessed by Env heath officer but not quite loud enough for notice, so letters sent.
  4. Paint 'accidentally' spilled on road outside my property (because was parked over our drive at time)
  5. Letters about rubbish outside my own garage at rear of properties and the 4 screws attaching bamboo to his fence. Then reported me for fly tipping, didnt go anywhere as officer agreed wasn't causing an issue. I have since sorted the screws and bamboo and idiots fence is literally falling apart.
  6. Concreting over 1/4 of my grass in rear lane whilst doing own part.
  7. Stupid things like having a BBQ and the parasol sticking way over the fence into my garden.

All very subtle and annoying things to cause issues, without quite breaking the law.

 

The council are aware and claim powerless as own properties and the police pretty much are not interested.

 

What can be done? 

 

Cheers

 

E!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of good ideas 👍

 

My issue with the council is they claim not to have power to do anything apart from write a nice letter 🤬 

 

An ABSO would be ideal. I have provided them with photographic evidence of all I have mentioned, they can to my home for a meeting and seemed to be scratching their heads 🤔

 

Wanting to go along a resolution route to hear for the other idiot, with no consequence as a result?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Do any of you know what counts as harassment?

 

The parking is still happening, possibly not enough over to get a ticket but enough to cause inconvenience.

 

Whenever I have unfortunate event of being outside the properties at the same time, the idiot stares at me, I am guessing trying to intimidate.

 

There is a bit on the police website about harassment and stalking which lists 'staring' interestingly.

 

Any advice please?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Update on this one.

 

The neighbour has fitted two more cameras, the most annoying is almost inbetween the two properties, not far off gutter height, for one keeps making a chiming sound and is pointing at the back of the idiots cars, where it is always parked over our drive, but not enough for parking control to issue a ticket!

 

Bascially, three coppers said they have no power and were not interesting in the CCTV, then to my amazment one raised a number and asked an officer to visit. I had, the most useless, pcso go out, look at the camera for 30 seconds, knock the door, idiot wasnt there, went back the next day, in the day time!!! and then called me to say there is nothing they can do.

 

This camera has activated and chimied when I got into my car in my own front garden. It also chimed at my neighbour across the road when she got into her car. It also seems to chime randonly, including through the night and has woken me up before, grrr! TThis to me proves it is picking up and recording the path and street too.

 

Can any suggest what I can do? ICO?

 

I also made a list of all the things the idiot has done and emailed it to a copper, who must have spent a good hour advising why the coppers wont do anything about this and that it doesnt amount to harrassment!

 

Cheers

 

E!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe, but often when the things activates it makes a chiming noise which wakes us up, grrrr

 

Yes, council don't want to know as claim have no power as private homes and police are pretty much the same, total joke!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really, it can be random. Sometimes when nothing there, and then doesnt make the noise everytime we are in garden,

 

I have just filled in the ICO form and it then says:

 

Please note: in most CCTV-related disputes between neighbours, the ICO will not consider it appropriate or proportionate to take enforcement action against the CCTV user.

If you cannot resolve the issue with the CCTV user, you may wish to pursue a private claim in the courts under the data protection laws. If you are considering taking legal action, we recommend you first get independent legal advice.

 

🤨

Edited by NGEddie
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

An update on this, for unknown reasons the parking is happening again.

 

Lets forget all the other things as the police and council are a total waste of time!!! and the house insurance didnt seem to want to cover the parking thing.

 

Without resorting to something which is going to get me in trouble, as far as I can tell there are two options.

 

1. Buy a crap but really long vehicle, park it outside the idiots house, tax/mot'd/insured and leave it there indefinatley. This means they cannot park outside own place or keep obstructing us. Then if does park over ours it would be fully blocking and the police and parking enforcement would have to issue tickets and some sort of acrtion.

 

2. Go with advice you gave about court, but really, how much time and effort is this? is it going to cost me? and what are possibles of a good outcome?

 

First photo shows all the room to left outside idiots own property and how purposley parks this far back to the right over ours to make it difficult getting in and out.

 

Second is close up showing bumper fully over sloping kerb, but wheel isnt go no authority interested.

 

Please let me know your thoughts.

 

E!

 

 

idiot 2.jpg

Idiot1.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are leaning on an open door ericsbrother, I totally agree!

 

The parking enforcement team claim legislation says it has to be the wheel over and have been out several times, assessed and not issued a ticket, annoying!

 

Is there anything official which states this? i have searched but cannot locate😕 

 

I very much want it sorted, as please say otherwise, but am sure this is wrong!

Link to post
Share on other sites

From the council...

 

The Government legislation we refer to is Section 86 of the Traffic Management Act 2004, specifically in your circumstances:

 

·   (iii) assisting vehicles entering or leaving the carriageway across the footway, cycle track or verge

 

More details of which can be found on the following link: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/18/section/86

 

As a local authority, vehicles that are parked close to the dropped kerb but not physically preventing a vehicle from coming or going will not fall under the criteria of the contravention and a penalty will not be issued in such circumstances.

 

🤔

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not avoiding it. I'd be happy to do whatever solves it, just baffled that laws are created but no-one wants to enforce them!

 

I've spent £000's having drive done, kerb etc... Then you get some 🤬 who purposely does this!

 

As a prediction, how would this work?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...