Suppressed Cancer Cure-Court Case .19th November-London.

[BazzaS]

Just having a root around looking for what the prosecution are up to.

Possibly this.

 

 

But not forgetting.

 

 

In the meantime a little about David Noakes,sure is a busy talented man.Of course these links are usually not fully up to date.

David Noakes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Noakes

 

I am sure there will be live links on the days of the court case perhaps from Ian Rowland Crane and will put them here if so.

 

right, so you want the evil MHRA exposed, and David Noakes to be immune from prosecution?.

 

you seem to feel: The MHRA is wrong, because some of its board are industry experts, and thus biased. Who would you prefer the MHRA rely on, people with no experience?.

 

Yet, while accusing the MHRA staff of bias, you ignore that David Noakes is similarly, not without conflict of interest, making money out of GcMAF.

The same GcMAF that he holds as a cure for cancer, yet Cancer Research UK say:

https://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2008/12/03/cancer-cured-for-good-gc-maf-and-the-miracle-cure/

Some companies are selling Gc-MAF for use by cancer patients. This treatment is not approved or licensed in the UK for treating cancer or any 0ther disease. Given that there is no solid scientific evidence to show that the treatment is safe or effective, we would not recommend that cancer patients use it.

 

Cancer is an extremely complex disease. In fact, it is more than 200 distinct diseases, each requiring different treatment. And the success of treatment depends on many things, including the genetic make-up of the tumour, the stage of diagnosis, and how aggressive the cancer is.

 

To suggest that there is a ‘magic bullet’ that cures all cancers is simplistic in the extreme.

 

Desperate people will try anything. Don't buy the snake oil. Don't support snake oil peddlars.

 

But wait, it isn't just cancer, GcMAF is a treatment for autism too!, (apparently).

Oh, yes, and "HIV, liver/kidney disease and diabetes.” "Rumor has it that GcMAF has the potential to be a cure for even more diseases, such as herpes, as well."

Well, so says Snopes, while thoroughly debunking these claims.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2017/09/05/scientists-questionable-institute-cancer/

 

So, what about autism?.

The National Autistic Society has told the BBC it is "extremely concerned". Jane Harris, its director of external affairs and social change, said: "There is no serious evidence of any kind to support the claims made for GcMAF.

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-34326801

 

That BBC news article also notes that GcMAF is a human blood product, and there were concerns that it could be contaminated.

The starting material being used by the firm wasn't known to be fit for use in medicines:

The blood plasma starting material being used to make this drug stated “Not to be administered to humans or used in any drug products”

and the production plant wasnt known to be safe for manufacturing human blood products

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/regulator-warns-against-gcmaf-made-in-unlicensed-facility-in-cambridgeshire

 

So, David Noakes isn't unbiased, and some of the MHRA board may have conflcits of interest too. So, who to believe?.

I'd go with Cancer Research UK and the National Autistic Society, who say don't use GcMAF

 

You seem to be saying "Big Pharma is bad, they are all about the profit". It is true the want to make a profit, they are a business. Their shareholders invest wanting to get a return.

 

Yet, their products are heavily regulated. You seem to be saying it is OK for David Noakes to make a profit, just because his business is smaller. Yoiu ignore that his products havent been shown to work, may be unsafe, and aren't recommended by Cancer Research UK and the National Autistic Society.

 

He trades in misery, relying on the desparation of people with awful medical conditions to get his company to make sales. The most basic of research online shows the details I have provided. Shame on you for buying in to, and perpetrating, his snake oil claptrap.

 

As for:

"

David Noakeshad developed an extremely effective CANCER treatment, which threatened the Big Pharma monopoly, established by the 1939 CANCER ACT. On the advice of his legal team, David pleaded GUILTY to manufacturing and supplying an Unlicensed Medicine and is scheduled to appear at Southwark Crown Court in Southeast Londonfor a 3 day sentencing hearing, commencing at 10am on Monday 19th November 2018... in which the MHRA will be seeking a Custodial sentence ... all because David Noakes had the audacity to produce an EFFECTIVE CANCER TREATMENT!"

 

He plea was "guilty".

His cancer treatment isn't effective.

He is highly skilled. Skilled at peddling snake oil. I hope he has packed his toothbrush, and I hope he needs to take it with him after sentencing ......

[BazzaS]

He trades in misery, relying on the desparation of people with awful medical conditions to get his company to make sales. The most basic of research online shows the details I have provided. Shame on you for buying in to, and perpetrating, his snake oil claptrap.

 

That should (of course) say “perpetuating” rather than “perpetrating”. Sorry for the typo

[BazzaS]

So, it’s all a big plot by Big Pharma.

 

What about the countless Haematologists and Oncologists employed by the NHS, who aren’t paid by “Big Pharma”.

If these snake oil cures are so wonderful, why aren’t the clinicians using them?

Options are:

a) they are in Big Pharma’s pocket : what, all of them

b) they are fooled by Big Pharma: don’t you think they’d try them if there was a shred of evidence they work?. Who wouldn’t want to go down in history as the person who established a new, better, treatment?.

(Barry Marshall got a Nobel Prize ....

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Marshall )

c) the “cure” is snake oil, and it’s pedlars trade in people’s misery and desperation.

 

On balance of probabilities I’m going with c)

 

TawnyOwl : why do you keep pushing the agenda and comments of that quack?

[BazzaS]

GcMAF which if i am reading right is within us but when the immune system is down and given back can kickstart the bodies fightback.I hope that is correct if not ,i will correct things as time goes by.

.

 

Given all I’ve posted, do you really believe that that is correct about GCMAF?

 

If so, are you interested in buying some bridges I could sell you? Great tourist attractions with both income and capital appreciation potential .......

[BazzaS]

GcMAF: Unlicensed HIV drug 'nearly killed patient' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-guernsey-46308221

 

“Up to 75% of patients who reported taking an unlicensed drug marketed as a cure for autism, HIV and cancer, suffered side effects, a court heard.”

 

“During the hearing Noakes defended GcMAF as a treatment for a number of conditions, but on Tuesday said he no longer claims it cures cancer.”