Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Incidentally to answer your question about what should you do immediately, I would suggest that you send the letter tomorrow. Wait until the end of the week. If they don't respond or if they respond negatively, then write to them immediately and tell them that you are not prepared to do without the vehicle. As they have failed to respond to your putting work in hand and you will be approaching them for the costs of all the repairs and if they cause you any difficulty in you will simply sue them. A bill of about £4000 is easy. It puts you within the small claims track so there is no risk of costs even if you lose – which is most unlikely on the basis of what you say
    • I found it cheers Dave!!   I think focusing on lack of compliance with legislation should be the one, seeing as we just lost the case to them by not complying, it will be worth pointing it out. I also want to poi t out their m.o. Which is less than honourable to say the least. Hopefully the judge will side with the little old lady and not the peoppe who use deceit to line their pockets!!   She said she is happy to speak up but is kindly asking for assistance in the form of a bullet pointed printed paper for her to take in so she can read out her points and leave it at that (without rambling).    Straight and to the point!!    Daves post #66 is legendary 🙌    Thanks for the help guys 😊    Let's kick some ass    
    • I differ from my site team colleague slightly in the the six-month rule applies if you have asserted your rights within the six months. My understanding is that you haven't asserted your rights during that time. In other words you haven't informed them that you are giving them a single opportunity to repair and if they decline or if the repair fails then you are rejecting the car for a refund. Please correct me if I'm wrong. On that basis, you are covered by the consumer rights act but not in terms of the right to reject. You are covered under the consumer rights act in that you are entitled to purchase a vehicle which is of satisfactory quality and remains that way for a reasonable period of time. You don't have to prove that the fault existed at the time of sale – although that's what they will try to tell you and even the motoring ombudsman will try to tell you that. But the motoring ombudsman is an industry led organisation which pretends to be an ombudsman but in fact favours the industry and its advice is wrong and even deceptive. I think you should start off by writing both to the finance company and also to the dealership. Describe the fault to them. Send them the evidence you have that the windscreen was incorrectly fitted and the damage which has been caused as a result. Send in the quotation for the work and require them to respond within seven days and that they must agree that the work will be carried out by a competent professional an authorised repairer. Not one of their cheapskate once. Also, you will want them to agree to provide you with a courtesy car. Also have you incurred any expenses associated with this? Travel, car hire, cost of inspections –?? Have you told us the name of the finance company? My site team colleague is correct that if they cause any trouble then you should see them as co-defendants. You can be certain that they will put their hands up. It will go to court. You would sue them for the cost of the work. You would recover your costs of the installation plus your court costs. I don't think you will be able to sue for the rejection of the vehicle on the basis of what you tell us in terms of having not asserted your rights. However you will be able to recover the cost of all the works – making good everything so that the car is in the condition that it would have been in had the replacement windscreen been properly fitted. I wonder who fitted the replacement windscreen? I think I would be out to sue them as well. Post the draft of your letter to the dealership and also to the finance company here so that we can have a look before you send it off.  
    • Thanks I have been reading quite a few this one got me as it did say they have instructed them to take legal action but thanks again your a legend 
    • Yes we will be emailing them. We have kept a log of all conversations with everyone involved and backed up conversations with emails 👍
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Can a solicitor ignore a request for legal assistance and a complaint?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2393 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Firstly, that page relates to decisions and their publication.

 

Secondly, if they are challengeable by appeal, and that hasn’t been done that precludes a judicial review in almost all circumstances, and is an absolute bar to granting of legal aid for judicial review.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Are we both wrong (and yet again both wrong)?

 

Yes, clearly you are wrong. The SRA is subject to Judicial Review.

 

Similar conversation on LegalBeables - going in circles a bit, but hasn't yet explored the SRA/FoI/JR what is a "prospective" client route.

 

I thought that is exactly what I was doing.

 

I thought I was grumpy at times but some people on here are clearly grumpy as hell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he's trying to say (quite clearly! )that you can't get legal aid to JR the SRA. Not that the SRA is not subject to JR.

 

Quite.

 

It might (in very restricted circumstance!) be possible to get legal aid for a judicial review of an SRA decision, although it will be vanishingly rare.

More and more obstacles to LA funding of JR's has been created, not just in 2013 but in the 2016 amendments, too.

 

Thge OP seems to be conflating:

a) Is the SRA subject to JR with

b) Is it likely there can be LA funding for a JR of an SRA decision, with

c) Is it likely there can be LA funding of a JR of an SRA assessment that a matter falls outside of their remit for a decision!, with

d) Could this OP get LA funding for a a JR of the SRA's assessment that the OP's complaint about the new instruction is a matter that falls outside of their remit for a SRA code of conduct decision!

 

The OP may try to divert attention to any of a-c), where what matters to the OP is d) ; the situation they face.

 

So, the OP, on the matter they have raised : the SRA's hadling of their complaint about the firm's refusal to take new instruction on a new matter , is nowhere near able to get LA funding for a JR, on at least 2 aspects (merits, and process ; the process issue being that they haven't exhausted an appeal option available to them).

 

Similar conversation on LegalBeables - going in circles a bit, but hasn't yet explored the SRA/FoI/JR what is a "prospective" client route.

 

Are they giving the impression they are 'posting for validation, not advice' there too?.

 

 

I thought that is exactly what I was doing.

 

I thought I was grumpy at times but some people on here are clearly grumpy as hell.

 

Why is it 'grumpy' to not only say that you are wrong, but explain why you are wrong, too.

You only perceive it as 'grumpy' because you only want to hear answers that validate your expectations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he's trying to say (quite clearly! )that you can't get legal aid to JR the SRA. Not that the SRA is not subject to JR.

 

I do not know whether either or both of these is true (or false!)

 

Err... he seems to be suggesting (quite clearly!) that legal aid is not available as the SRA are not a government body and because they are exempt from the FOI Act. This is of course absurd.

 

Quite.

 

It might (in very restricted circumstance!) be possible to get legal aid for a judicial review of an SRA decision, although it will be vanishingly rare.

More and more obstacles to LA funding of JR's has been created, not just in 2013 but in the 2016 amendments, too.

 

Thge OP seems to be conflating:

a) Is the SRA subject to JR with

b) Is it likely there can be LA funding for a JR of an SRA decision, with

c) Is it likely there can be LA funding of a JR of an SRA assessment that a matter falls outside of their remit for a decision!, with

d) Could this OP get LA funding for a a JR of the SRA's assessment that the OP's complaint about the new instruction is a matter that falls outside of their remit for a SRA code of conduct decision!

 

The OP may try to divert attention to any of a-c), where what matters to the OP is d) ; the situation they face.

 

So, the OP, on the matter they have raised : the SRA's hadling of their complaint about the firm's refusal to take new instruction on a new matter , is nowhere near able to get LA funding for a JR, on at least 2 aspects (merits, and process ; the process issue being that they haven't exhausted an appeal option available to them).

 

Are they giving the impression they are 'posting for validation, not advice' there too?.

 

Why is it 'grumpy' to not only say that you are wrong, but explain why you are wrong, too.

You only perceive it as 'grumpy' because you only want to hear answers that validate your expectations.

 

Did someone on this thread accuse me of being argumentative?

 

Are you a solicitor trained in public law?

 

Can you see into the future and see how the SRA are going to respond to my request for information and can you foresee the outcome of any appeal or request for them to review their decision?

 

It is certainly my impression that certain people are hoping I am unsuccessful in any regard here. So much for being a positive contribution to this forum...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Err... he seems to be suggesting (quite clearly!) that legal aid is not available as the SRA are not a government body and because they are exempt from the FOI Act. This is of course absurd.

 

Not only won't you get legal aid you won't have any standing to bring a JR against them as you are neither regulated by them or are commercially effected by their decisions. You are a third party.

 

 

Have you actually come across any judicial review case bought by an individual against SRA or in fact any non governmental regulator?

Link to post
Share on other sites

re cjc post #115

thats what i was getting at, ''regulatory decisions' when they say they can be JR'd. ie a regulatory decision against a sol/firm.

re joe bloggs being unhappy with the sra's decision not to side with them and make a decision against a firm, they wld have to make a complaint to the sra. then if still unhappy, go to the ombudsman re the sra's decision. as per the legit formal process. JR against the sra re that?, no chance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Do you suffer from dyslexia?

 

The claimant in this case was regulated by body he judicially reviewed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but your grammar isn't the best so I am struggling to understand what you are positing.

:)

don't apologise.

it's quite clear, no chance of JR

and yes, thats the thing, you are struggling to understand anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you suffer from dyslexia?

 

 

The claimant in this case was regulated by body he judicially reviewed.

 

He is still an individual and it's a case brought against a non-government body. That's what you asked for or are you backtracking now?

 

So, you are still suggesting a member of the public cannot challenge a regulator's decision by way of JR?

 

:)

don't apologise.

it's quite clear, no chance of JR

and yes, thats the thing, you are struggling to understand anything.

 

Yes, thanks for the impartial 'advice'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He is still an individual and it's a case brought against a non-government body. That's what you asked for or are you backtracking now?

 

So, you are still suggesting a member of the public cannot challenge a regulator's decision by way of JR?

 

 

 

 

''He'' is actually a she who bought the case not as a ''member of the public'' but as a regulated counselling psychotherapist practitioner against her professional body.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case, she is still an individual (i.e. not an organisation).

 

Whose decisions can be challenged by judicial review?

 

Decisions made by public bodies in a public law capacity may be challenged by judicial review.

 

If a public body is not exercising a public function, for instance where it is acting as an employer, or in a contractual relationship with a supplier, or if it acts negligently, its actions are governed by private, not public law.

 

Increasingly public functions are contracted out to private companies. If a private company is deemed to be exercising a public function, its acts and omissions are governed by public law. For example a private company that runs a prison is deemed to be exercising a public function and so its actions in the running of the prison are governed by public law.

 

Who can bring a judicial review?

 

You have to have an interest in the decision you are challenging to bring a judicial review, or what is called “standing”. That means you have to have sufficient connection to the subject matter of the claim. If the remedies the court can offer might make a practical difference to you, then the test is likely to be met.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, to a degree.

 

The SRA has already dismissed my complaint regarding the second matter (when the firm just ignored me and my complaint) on the grounds it felt I did not meet the definition of a "client".

 

They may shed some light on how a "client" is defined, in particular a "prospective client".

 

It seems there may be a process or procedure in place to ask them to review their decision though and they may agree they got it wrong in their initial decision.

 

I'd certainly like some clarity if nothing else.

 

I've not complained about the second matter to the LO yet. I have about the first matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, ok.

 

So purely talking about the second incident (not accepting your instructions or giving you advice on a new matter) have you made a formal complaint to the firm about their lack of response?

 

Why did you skip the LO and go straight to the SRA about the second issue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, they ignored the complaint too.

 

I have to wait 8 weeks before I can complaint to the LO.

 

I complained on 11 October 2017 (less than 8 weeks ago).

 

The LO may also argue I was not a client of theirs, and therefore their actions were acceptable, which is another reason I want clarity on that issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why did you skip the LO and go straight to the SRA about the second issue?

 

Back on page one of the thread .....

 

You could have (& probably should have!) gone to the Legal Ombudsman, rather than the SRA.

 

The SRA can't investigate "poor service" if it doesn't involve a breach of the SRA's code of conduct, whereas the LO can, and if it finds breaches of the SRA's code of conduct can refer them to the SRA for you ....

Are you now out of time to refer this to the LO?

 

I have referred the initial issues to the Legal Ombudsman.

 

I have to wait 8 weeks for the firm to respond to my most recent complaint before I refer these issues to the Legal Ombudsman (8 weeks has not elapsed yet).

 

I have referred cases to the Legal Ombudsman before and found they are a complete waste of time and government funds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aren't you getting ahead of yourself with the whole JR issue?

 

Aren't you still waiting on the LO decision?

 

And any appeal against the SRA saying that they can’t consider any breach of their code of conduct for when the OP wasn’t a client.

 

(I doubt any appeal will succeed, but not having appealed ruled out a JR....., the OP would have to appeal and have the appeal rejected first.)

 

Yes, thanks for the impartial 'advice'.

 

Yes, any advice that doesn’t fit with your pre-formed view can’t be:

a) impartial, and

b) has to be ‘advice’ rather than advice (minus the “ ‘ “).

In a similar vein;

 

It is certainly my impression that certain people are hoping I am unsuccessful in any regard here. So much for being a positive contribution to this forum...

 

Ahem. You seem to be confusing:

“I think you will be unsuccessful “ (and an assiciated explanation of why!) with “I hope you will be unsuccessful”.........

 

Don’t forget: any post that fits your pre-formed view must be correct, no matter how poorly framed / unsupported by logical argument.

Any post that contradicts your pre-formed view must be wrong / wishing you ill / argumentative no matter how well phrased and supported by facts / logic. Simples.

 

Yet, who else thinks you are correct?. Clearly you are correct, and the rest of us are dullards,

Sorry but your grammar isn't the best so I am struggling to understand what you are positing.

 

Or the rest of us can’t compose posts properly.

Mind you, dullard that I am I still find Ford’s posts entirely comprehendable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...