Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Employment tribunal (urgent help) Schedule of loss


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2715 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have no legal rep apart from my union rep who really does not seem to be helping at all.

 

 

I received confirmation of a tribunal hearing date and three deadlines to supply information to the respondent.

 

 

One was the 6th just past which asked me to explain my losses which i did......but that was not correct.

It wasnt until i delved deeper i learned that i had to submit a schedule of loss.

 

 

Now i filled this in with what i believed to be my losses,

but my previous emplyers legal team have said that this was not correct as it does not contain any information on steps taken to reduce my loss (including any earnings or benefits received from new employment)

 

 

now when i was dissmised (firstly simply because "it was not working out"

and then when i challeneged this it was changed to gross misconduct)

 

 

i was unempoyed for three months before i took my new job,

i wasnt aware that that could be a loss.

 

 

Please please can someone assist me on how to complete properly a schedule of loss......

..their team have also said that my original email could not be accepted as the heading was "without prejudice"

this was there because i simply replied to their email and that was in the heading.

 

 

Now i sent this on the 6th and they have only responded to me today and said they may now not be able to meet the next deadline of the 10th because of this.

 

 

Do you think it would be possible for me to ask them to grant a day extension to cover this.

 

 

Hopefully someone can help as this is really stressing me and i have no legal knowledge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CAB have a helpful example schedule here

 

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/work/problems-at-work/employment-tribunals-from-29-july-2013/employment-tribunals-valuing-a-claim/compensatory-award/calculating-the-compensatory-award/employment-tribunals-preparing-a-schedule-of-loss/employment-tribunals-sample-schedule-of-loss/

 

When is it due in? Should only take an hour or so to complete it. I would avoid asking for an extension and just make sure it's in first thing Monday.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thank you very much for your advice,

 

 

it was meant to be in on the 6th just gone and i had that in late that night as i work away.

 

 

They have responded today stating that it is incorrect as it does not have the information mentioned above.

 

 

They also say it can not be used as it has without prejudice in the heading....

..but as i say i simply replied to their email and not start a clean email so the heading remained.

 

 

The next deadline is the 10th....

..although i i have already forward all relevant details that they would need for this deadline anyway....

 

 

...should i still ask for an extension?

Link to post
Share on other sites

what would stop you meeting the 10th? I'd get it over with myself

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing would stop me meeting the 10th.

....it is their legal team saying they dont know if they will be able to meet the next deadline of the 10th

 

 

( as there are three deadlines for information.....6th 10th 13th because they say this has delayed them)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never mind what the other side are saying - just make sure that you meet whatever deadlines are set for you to provide information - they are there to please the Tribunal, not to be convenient to the Defendant

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to remove "without prejudice" from the schedule as it's an open document, so the other side is right there. I assume you've provided information via email, so create a new document in word and send it to them by email that isn't marked without prejudice.

 

You could also email the ET to request an extension of time and explain that you did provide what you believed to be the required information by the 6th, but that you were informed that your interpretation of the order was not what the ET required and so you need an extension to provide a full schedule. Point out hah you aren't legally represented and that should cover that off.

 

In terms of the schedule, it depends what your claims are? For unfair dismissal, you'd look at claiming a basic award and compensatory award based on your loss of earnings. You'd then claim the difference in earnings after you secured a new job for a reasonable time period. You can also claim a small loss of statutory rights payment (£250-£350 is typical) if you had over two years service. Finally you'd look at other heads of claim - failing to provide a statement of particulars, or written reasons for dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and any uplift for a failure to follow the ACAS Code of Practice, for example, and separate that out in the schedule with how much you're claiming.

 

You do need to mitigate your loss and account for any earnings during the time you're claiming compensation. You do not, however, have to disclose evidence of a job search until the time for exchange of lists of documents and the documents themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS - don't put any benefits down. They can produce a counter schedule for that as it's used as a negotiation point at this stage only.

 

If you succeed at an ET then benefits paid would be deducted from the compensation payment, so you don't want to effectively deduct it twice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...