Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Rejecting a car because of fault found


ecopygmy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2737 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In short:

 

I purchased a car on the 7th and picked it up on the 9th which needed a service and cambelt.

 

One of the tyres deflated slowly on the way home.

I was not told that the car had a slow puncture.

That said, I don't like using tyres on second-hand cars because you don't know if they've been repaired...etc so wasnt bothered about replacing them.

 

The wheel locking key which was supposed to be in the glove box was missing

I purchased a replacement and had the tyres replaced at my cost

when it arrived a week later (16th).

The dealer just stated that it should be in the car.

 

I went to perform the service yesterday and didnt get far.

Upon removing the undertray there was a clear sign of the clutch slave cylinder inside the bell housing was leaking and has been for some time.

 

The consequences of this could be hundreds and its a big job that Im reluctant to tackle myself.

At a garage the cost could be as high as £1200.

 

The car cost 2.5k which was top money by the price guides

. There is a warranty but they will just replace the cylinder leaving the clutch in a state whereby I don't know if it will fail prematurely.

 

There are several other problems, some of which Im prepared to repair, others not.

 

Firstly, I asked in the initial conversation about the car if any fluids were leaking or if there were problems with the engine/gearbox to which they said no.

As this is under 14 days I presume I can just reject?

 

Secondly, what if any are my options with the new tyres?

I might phone up the tyre place to see if they can refit but I doubt thats an option

. They cost just over £400 so I dont want the dealer to benefit.

 

I cant drive the car for fear of the clutch failing and yet again have a hire car.

 

At least I still have all the service parts and can return them because I didnt want to do any work to the car after discovering the faults

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm assuming that you bought this from a trade/commercial dealer. If you bought this from a private seller that is a different ball game.

 

You should send them a letter outlining the defects and asserting the right to reject. Make sure that the letter is absolutely clear that you are returning the car to him under the Consumer Rights Act 2015. You are within 30 days of discovering the defect so you are entitled to do this.

 

Get the letter to the dealer as quickly as possible – but I would suggest that you send a copy by recorded delivery. But deliver a copy to his hand anyway in view of the postal strike.

 

As it was quite reasonable to replace the tires, you will be entitled to claim the cost of the tyres from the dealer. Also you would be entitled to claim your reasonable losses for a limited period so the cost of a car would be all right – allowing for a reasonable time to find a replacement car, which might be only about seven days.

 

However, don't necessarily expect the dealer to comply gracefully. One of the important things is to get the car back to the dealer. You need to photograph it to show that it is in the condition in which you bought it. You need to leave it on his forecourt if you can and when you do photograph it again so that there are no mysterious dents which appear later on.

 

Once again, in respect of your additional losses/expenses you are likely to have a fight on your hands and you may have to bring a small claims action. Make sure you have got all the bills. If you bring a small claim action then we will help you and on the basis of what you say your chances are extremely high – better than 90 to 95%

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought from a comercial dealer who pride themselves on providing quality used cars with warrenties :| The one tyre I have from the car is actually the wrong load index so I dont believe thats legal.

 

I have all the bills from the hire car and replacement tyres. Not too fussed about the hire car or charges relating to searching for another car, I just want to cut my losses before the bills rack up.

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...