Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capquest and Erudio ate my hamster


GreatHeight
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2796 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

first of all, hello I'm new on here :!:

secondly, sorry for the slightly silly title :madgrin:

 

this relates to a student loan from way back in 1992.

It was deferred for many years,

 

 

when it transferred from SLC to Erudio I noticed that £9 a month was coming out of my pay packet.

I was earning below the threshold but decided to just let it happen,

it was only £9 a month and not worth kicking up a fuss.

 

 

That continued for a couple of years and then suddenly it stopped.

No explanation or anything from Erudio about what was going on.

Again, I just left it, what the hell I thought.

 

There was then a gap of maybe a year during which I heard nothing from Erudio.

Then out of the blue about 6 months ago I got a letter from them saying my loan would now be managed by Capquest.

No explanation as to why.

Nothing from them saying I was in default or anything, no arrears either.

 

Capquest then start hounding me for the money.

Its about £500 I owe.

they wanted all the money, there and then!

They wrote to me and phoned me.

They wanted to know what car I have, what mortgage I have, how much my wife earns.

 

They said I could not defer even though I earn well below the threshold.

 

In the end I agreed to carry on paying £9 a month to them by direct debit.

Its not the end of the world but I do feel like they've pulled a fast one on me.

My loan is 24 years old.

I long believed it would be written off at 25 years.

Have they just knocked that one of the head for me between them?

 

I had a statement from Erudio last month which clearly states I have no arrears.

Yet when I emailed Erudio asking for a deferment form they said my account with them was terminated and I could only deal with the horrible capquest.

 

Sorry for the ramble.

Like I say its not the end of the world for me,

I just feel like I've been conned a bit by them,

and any thoughts or advice would be very much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

capquest are arrows are erudio all the same lot.

 

 

itake it you sadly spoke to crapest on the phone?

hence all these threats spoofed you and you told them everything including your inside leg measurement?

which they are not ever entitlted to anyway..

was this on the phone?

 

 

next time, put the phone down

they ARE NOT BAILIFFS

and have

NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS.

 

 

now you say you've been with erudio for several years?

cant be that long they only got sold the loans late 2013 early 2014.

 

 

sound to me you've been had blind.

 

 

might pay you to SAR SLC and get all the statements and paperwork.

 

 

when was the last SLC deferral?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have Greatheights, unfortunately.

 

Crappest as someone heRe calls them are a DCA like Eurido et al and many of them are the same company, just a different bluff name.

 

Im sure someone will be along with good advice as to what course of action you should take.

 

PS: Welcome to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

warren butt in if you want

I always miss things..

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies, much appreciated.

 

Yes it was over the phone they got me to set up the direct debit

~ they said otherwise they would mark me down as a 'refusal to pay'

and I didn't know what that meant exactly but I didn't like the sound of it.

 

 

My wife told me not to get a bad credit mark or she would clatter me with the frying pan!

 

What do you think they would do if I cancelled the direct debit? Would it affect my credit worthiness?

I can't remember the last time I got it deferred.

 

 

I lost track of it over time. :violin:

 

 

What is a SAR?

 

 

And how would that help?

 

Cheers again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

click the sar link and read though why is in post 2.

 

 

stop the payments

they cant trash your credit file no matter what the no powers DCA has told you

 

 

if they do well deal with it.

but I suspect this is well statute barred.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for the advice. I'm not sure it is statute barred because I have made payments during the last six years. In fact I never asked to stop the payments, it was Erudio who just stopped taking them.

 

In 10 months time this loan becomes 25 years old. Student loans are supposedly written off after that time.

 

Do you think that will happen now I've been moved to Capquest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, sorry to jump in here.

 

As you say, you have paid in the last 6 years however, was there another 6 year period preceding this where no payment and no deferment was done? If so, you have been (as DX would say) cash cowed.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

My tuppence worth,

A SAR will show you everything they have as regards your Student Loans, in lay mans term it will show you if they have any right of ownership over this "Alleged" debt and if they have failed to follow the proper legal process. (They generally do)

 

Silverfox makes a good point above, you mentioned in the opening post that there was a gap in when you lost total contact and they stopped taking payment, the SAR will show this and if 6yrs or more its Statute Barred and they have been stealing from you ever since.

 

So, first thing to do, as advised is to send a SAR so you can establish if they have evidence to enforce the debt or provide you with the evidence to prove they havn't?

Link to post
Share on other sites

small point

you haven't moved anywhere

I say again capquest ARE ARROWS ARE ERUDIO..

next desk different bloke in a different coloured skirt.

 

 

stop falling for the illusion its escalated anywhere.

you got mugged on the phone..end of.

 

 

its that conversation where they said a whole load of things they would never put in writing scared you

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, sorry to jump in here.

 

As you say, you have paid in the last 6 years however, was there another 6 year period preceding this where no payment and no deferment was done? If so, you have been (as DX would say) cash cowed.

 

Hi,

there was never a 6 year gap when I had no contact - I renewed deferment every year for many years and then started paying it off, but I never lost contact for 6 years. The only gap was for about one year, when Erudio for whatever reason stopped taking my payments.

 

I don't really know what to do with this at the moment. I'm thinking that if this loan will be written off next year when it reaches the 25 year mark, then i will have paid about £90 to capquest in monthly payments by then ~ maybe that's worth it to keep them off my back. But if they wriggle out of writing the loan off next year and I have to carry on paying, then I'll be naffed off about that for sure.

 

Its like they've changed the goalposts.

 

I realise its a loan and its reasonable to pay loans back, but I have always followed the rules, I deferred it when I wasn't earning the threshold, I paid it when I was, and I even paid some when I was back under the threshold again. then out of the blue they send me to a debt collector, albeit the same company like has been pointed out.

 

I haven't done anything wrong regarding the loan and have never had any letter warning me that I was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR time

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The SAR should throw up any muppetry by the Arrows shower, certainly something you could spank them with later.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
SAR time

 

 

Thank you to everyone for all your advice on this, sorry I haven't replied for a while, been having some other issues, if its not one thing its a million others!

 

Anyhow, Erudio have recently informed me that my loan 'matured' (whatever that means? Defaulted?) on 31.3.2010 and at that point my account 'exited the terms and conditions' and became 'payable in full' and this is why it was passed over to Capquest - albeit six years later!

 

At no point did I receive any letter from either Erudio or for that matter the Student Loans Company informing me that this had happened.

 

So, like you have suggested, it is SAR time. Should I send the request to ERudio or to the Student Loans Company?

 

And when I get the information from them, what do I look for and what do I do with it?

 

 

Many many thanks,

GreatHeight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

crapest are arrows same lot

sar slc maturing...what rubbish.......

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like it might be Statute Barred being an old Mortgage style loan then. if defaulted in March 2010 and not chased until now. See what the SAR reveals.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...