Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tesco Bank : Displaying Recoveries Dept on Envelope - legal?


cfs_too
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2822 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have a strange question, and hope someone familiar with debt collection procedures / DPA 1998 are able to assist.

 

I am disabled, living with elderly parents. My father has never been in debt, and would absolutely freak out of he knew I still owed Tesco Bank a considerable amount of money.

 

I am in comms with them regarding token payment on debt, its been over 10 years of intermittent token payments, DCAs etc but recently I keep receiving letters from their recoveries department but with the fact it is the recoveries department clearly showing on the front of the envelope.

 

A few years ago I thought I read that DCA's etc needed to be more discreet when addressing people who owe money.

Luckily I have stopped my father seeing these envelopes but if he does see one my relationship with the family will suffer tremendously.

 

How can I ask Tesco Bank to be more respectful in there posting of Debt letters?

 

Are they breaking any Date Protection Issues by showing recoveries department on the letter?

 

Thanks

Me_too

TESCO PRINT.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Am I right in thinking that what the image shows is the letter heading from inside the envelope rather than actually on the envelope itself?

 

I would still complain to Tesco although it may be that th wrong envelope may have been used. No excuse I know but it would explain it

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Silverfox,

Thanks for your prompt response, I got a little side tracked with a PIP Medical :!:

 

I did write to Tesco (Data Controller) got a response from Customer services, the response :

"Whilst I appreciate you are unhappy this information can be viewed, this would not be a breach of data protection".

 

Yes its the letter heading showing through the window.

This letter is the third or fourth time, each time the heading shows and the address is NEVER in the correct place.

 

I think they have major problems with the formatting of the letters, as the address is clearly printing in the wrong location and in conjunction with the 'folding machine' they are always in the wrong place, but never consistently in the same wrong place.

 

I am ex-IT programmer, so I know how easy it is to change the location of the address, however it appears it is not a problem to them.

 

Not sure what to do next, maybe a letter to ICO (for what thats worth).

Thanks

Me_too

 

Oh, and I forgot the best bit. I also sent a DSAR to Tesco.

 

I received 2 parcels, on 2 separate days, in 'Royal Mail we're sorry your item was damaged' clear bags.

 

The DSAR department placed approx. 100 sheets (each) into the thinest, poorest quality envelopes possible to put into the post.

 

Needless to say the envelopes tore due to the poor quality and all of my personal financial documents scattered from the envelopes.

 

Royal Mail kindly bundled them up, twice, and placed them into clear bags.

I don't think that was acceptable from a DSAR department either! :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i'd be complaining to the ICO and CC the CEO of tescos too.

its not right

and just because they cant get their machinery to work properly

it should not be causing you undue potential embarrassment or distress.

 

 

now onto the debt

you say this has been on going for 10yrs or more?

you've got the statements..

 

 

has it got any PPI or any other stupid insurances?

are there any reclaimable penalty charges [fees for letters/phonecalls/debt management etc?]

 

 

have you ever sent them a CCA request?

 

 

you appears to indicate its still with the OC [Tesco's]

so this has moved on from when it used to be run by RBS

and it now being done by Tesco bank themselves?

did they send you a notice of assignment?

that it was changing ownership?

 

 

tell us the history of the loan

how much

when taken out etc etc.

 

 

whos had their mits on it DCA wise

and when you informed them you were in difficulties

did you or they get all interest frozon and stop penalty charges?

 

 

lots you can do to hit back shall we say...

 

 

HTH

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...