Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Final steps notice and the EA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2949 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A friend received a final steps notice (FSN) from their local Court 2 days ago.

 

 

The text asked them to contact the fines Officer to sort the non payment of fines out. This was passed to me to assist with. I called the Courts this morning, the conversation was as thus.

 

 

Fines Officer: (FO) your account has been passed to Marstons for enforcement we cant help.

 

 

Me: Ok then please can you arrange for the defaulter to be put in front of a Magistrate to hear a means enquiry hearing.

 

 

FO: Why is that?

 

 

Me: The defaulter wants time to pay but cannot make an SD as was already aware of the case.

 

 

FO: Ok why can they not pay?

 

 

ME: I explained the case was heard in their absence and a level of fines was issued, no account was taken as to the level of the repayment was taken in to account (MC100 form) not being completed.

 

 

FO: Let me check

 

 

Me: wait

 

 

Moments later the FO came back and asked for the debtor to come to Court to show an I&E form as to how much they can afford. No problem we are here right now. Then the FO came out and spoke to us, read the I&E form and took it away. Sometime later they returned and asked if allowed to pay by instalments when could they pay and how much.

 

 

Me: I said we have £50 cash now and can afford to pay £15-00pw from next week. (debtor working with 2 LO's in place with rent arrears and other non priority debts.

 

 

FO: As it is out to Marstons I will call them and have the order returned to us and we will agree your repayment plan. (result). We paid the £50-00 online then and there, FO saw this.

 

 

FO: goes away again the recall the warrant from Marstons. Then returns to us and explains this can be the last time you default as next time we will not hear anything from you.

 

 

Me: I thank you for your time on this matter and your considerations.

 

 

FO: We will issue you a fines card or you can pay online weekly this amount will be £xx-xx pw and your 1st payment must reach your account by **/**/2016.

 

 

Me Once again thank you for your time in this matter...

 

 

We all walk away from this mess happy knowing that I have just saved this debtor a £75-00 fee and a possible £235-00 fee as well. So with this information it goes to prove that what I have said many times over the years you can get a great result from your creditors only if you speak to them before or immediately after the FSN.

 

 

Note to admin this could do with being in the bailiff section as well, ?

 

 

Sorry for the long read!!

Edited by Andyorch
Edited

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MM I have copied thread over to the Bailiff Forum Discussion area also.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So two days after receipt of FSN, it was already with marstons???????

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think ther is usually 10 days to pay after a FS notice, if I remember correctly, BA will know. It is in the courts act 2003 schedule 5 i think.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like it was assigned to a batch sent to(or to be sent to) Marston's but they had yet to send a notice of enforcement and therefore, were able to return the case as the £75 hadn't been added.

Good result MM. If only more people faced up to their debts, the world would run a lot smoother. I'd be out of a job, but the world would run smoother.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like it was assigned to a batch sent to(or to be sent to) Marston's but they had yet to send a notice of enforcement and therefore, were able to return the case as the £75 hadn't been added.

 

Good result MM. If only more people faced up to their debts, the world would run a lot smoother. I'd be out of a job, but the world would run smoother.

 

I would agree. The Further Steps Notice must give the fine defaulter a period of 10 working days to pay the amount stated, failing which, a warrant would be issued. In this particular case, the letter had only been received two days earlier.

 

The other clue to indicate that a warrant had not been issued was that a text message had just been received from the Fines Officer.

 

Thankfullly, this person (assisted by MM) addressed the matter very quickly and a sensible payment proposal was set up.

 

If he has left it any longer, the account would have been passed to Marston's and a compliance fee of £75 would have been applied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...