Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Claiming against YCC/DAF


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3141 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My wife keeps advising me to claim against any PPI I may have paid to companies in the past, I mentioned I could not find any details so have not really bothered, but earlier this week I found in some old paperwork I was about to bin a conditional sale agreement for a car we purchased from YCC around the year 2000.

 

On this it states under additional insurances the following

 

10. £1213.40 Payment Protection Insurance Cash Premium

11. £650.00 Mechanical breakdown Insurance Cash Premium

12. £250.00 Gap Insurance Cash Premium

13. £2113.40 Total insurance premium (10+11+12)

14. £600 Less: Down Payment provided by Customer

15. £1513.40 Shortfall required by way of credit

16. £632.32 Add: Interest

17. £2145.60 Balance Payable (15+16)

18. £2745.60 Total Amount Payable (14+17)

19. 19.9 %APR

20. 48 Number of monthly Insurance Installments

21. £44.70 Amount of each Insurance Installment (17/20) the first payable one month after the date of this agreement.

 

Are we only able to claim for the part that was taken on credit or should we be able to claim for the full amount as we had paid £600 as lump sum towards it. Also I was the main hirer and my wife countersigned.

 

I have seen other posts on the forum regarding this company, but can someone confirm if I am still able to claim, must it be the main hirer only that can do this and do we send all the information to

 

Direct Auto Financial Services

P.O. Box 1135

Bradford

BD1 9PU

 

And if we do the Full Access Request, who do we make the postal order payable to

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes std PPI claim

 

 

I'd lump in gap & Mac too.

 

 

link 1 below tell you how to calculate it

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so £44.70 PCM into the statint sheet at the end of link 1

each monthly payment on its own row

the sheet does the rest

 

 

StatIntSheet v101.xls

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks, so the claim to date, would this be to the date of when the loan ended (48 months later) or today's date as per the formula - as if use the payment end date, the total figure is actually less that what was paid, but if use today's date and fill in 48 payments then it's more

 

did i also read your reply back correctly that it meant i could only claim for the bit that was taken on credit and the £600 deposit I would not be able to claim for.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

you leave the claim to date as is

it auto increments

 

 

you are entitled to 8% till the day they settle

 

 

you enter the data as post 3

dunno what you are going on about with the credit etc

the agreement says £44.70PCM was takem each month you paid

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

was it?

 

 

how do you know

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm only going from the form I have in front of me and as per my op - it says total insurance to pay was £2113.40 minus £600.00 (Down Payment by Customer) which gave £1513.40 to pay by credit (plus the interest £632.20)

 

I'm not sure of what percentage of the deposit was used against each aspect of the insurance that was taken out.

 

So when I request to make the claim is it only the £44.70pcm x 48 months I can claim against or the £44.70pcm x 48 months + £600 deposit

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah yes they did that didn't they sorry

there a large thread by UKDARREN here about that.

 

 

as the £600 was taken against the ins

then place that as £600 and date it the day you took the agreement out.

 

 

then 48x44.70 on each months date you actually paid for the car.

 

 

tidy sum coming your way..

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for help,

 

i will request SAR first to get exact dates of when this was taken out, but I believe it was around June 2000 as we got our new car in August 2004.

 

Just hope the bradford address is still valid for all this

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

should all be onyour agreement?

you appear to have everything you need to claim already

 

 

don't forget the fos cq you need to fill out too

 

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

thought would provide an update as finally received a letter back from DAFS

 

they say as we had a payment of £107.02 towards the GAP, this claim can not be processed

 

This is the final few transactions on the account

 

01/09/04 - Balance £1945.68

08/09/04 - Insurance settlement £2000, balance £54.32 credit

22/09/04 - Gap Receipt £107.02 balance £161.34 credit

23/09/04 - Refund of Overpayment £243.21 balance £81.87 to pay

24/09/04 - Rebate of Finance Charges £50.12- balance £31.75

24/09/04 - Rebate Insurance Charges £11.29 - balance £20.46

24/09/04 - Small Balance Write Off £20.45 - balance £0

 

Surely if my insurance had paid of the balance of the vehicle, then the gap should not have been used

 

according to them the PPI was only for the first name person on the agreement (and not both)

the state the polices were not mis-sold and were optional and because we have only raised this now and not at the time they rejecting the claim for PPI

They also state as the agreement was made before the 14 January 2005 when DAFS first became subject to formal regulation fore the selling of insurance under the Insurance: Conduct of Business (ICOB) requires and they have never been a member of GISC and thus never been subject to its Code of Conduct.

 

my wife has written letter back to the ombusman, disputing a lot of their claims, so will provide you with an update when it comes back

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...