Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

LOWELLS/BC Claimform - orange mobile 'debt'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3278 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,first time poster here.

 

I have a alleged outstanding debt from orange that Lowells are chasing me for,

 

I am at the point where I have just sent in my A O S,

 

i do intend to dispute the claim.

 

My question is this;

I am about to send off a SAR to EE and a CPR 31.14 to Bryan Carter,but,

 

do I need to pay them for these requests,

 

i think I read it on here somewhere,

 

but can't find it at the moment

 

any help will be greatly appreciated,

 

many thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You really need to give as much more information.

 

For instance you say that it is an alleged debt. Does this mean that you dispute it?

 

If so, on what basis.

 

You have just sent and acknowledgement of service? Does this mean that a claim has been issued?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there,bank fodder,

 

the reason it was brief is because I've seen lots of posts on this site with regards to this type of action from lowells/BC

,and just didn't want to clog it up with yet another one,

 

Yes, I do dispute it but it's a bit complicated.

 

Yes, a claim has been issued.

 

I'll try to explain;

I had a phone contract with orange for about 15 years.

I took another phone for my missus on my account about 6 years ago.

and then,about 4 years ago,i took 2 more phones for my 2 kids(they previously had payg)

 

About half way through the term of the kids contracts I received a letter from orange stating that they were changing the t/c's of all the contracts.

and as a result,wou;d be increasing the monthly tarrif for all of the phones,(they were all fixed rate).

This,I assumed they must be allowed to do.

 

a couple of months down the line,i found out that this was not the case,and they should have given me the opportunity to cancel,they didn't.

 

I also realised that because I paid with a debit card over the phone, i was being charged £2.90 plus vat per phone every month

,i suppose that was my fault for not reading the bills properly,

 

 

my argument on this point is this.

I only ever paid 1 bill every month,

but I was charged 4 times for it,

and as I understand it,

the consumer credit act states that,

companies can charge fees,

but those fees have to be fair,a

nd seeing how I only ever paid one bill per month,

how can being charged 4 times for it,be fair.

 

I rang orange numerous times about these issues

,but just got stonewalled ever time,

and on every occasion

,i was told that they had no record of any of my previous calls.

 

In the end I just stopped paying the bill.

they rang me several times to try to collect payment

,(I thought this was the best way of getting them to listen)

 

 

how wrong was I,

the only thing they were interested in was being paid,

 

 

in the end they passed it on to several dca's until eventually it ended up with lowells,

from whom I have had numerous letters

,but I have not made any contact with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you fill this out please

you don't need to send in the AOS

 

 

you do it online at MCOL website

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claimant : Lowell portfolio ltd

Date of Claim :18 june 2015

 

this claim is for 448 the amount due under an agreement between the original creditor and the defendant to provide finance and/or services and/or goods.

this debt was assigned to/purchased by Lowell portfolio l ltd on 23/09/2014

and notice served pursuant to the law of property act 1925

 

particulars

re- orange

a/c no xxxxxxxx

and the claimant claims 448

 

the claimant also claims statuary interest pursuant to s.69 of the county act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment of the agreement

to date but limited to a maximum of one year and a maximum of 1000 amounting to 27.00

 

total claim is for 559

 

the claim is for a mobile phone account

 

the original contract was taken out about 15 years ago

 

the claim was issued by the assigned debt purchaser

 

I think I had a letter from orange saying it had been assigned,but I don't think it was lowells.

 

I'm not sure if I received a default notice,i can't remember.

 

I haven't received any statutary notice of default as far as I am aware.

 

I ceased payments because I had 2 issues with orange and they would not listen,

i believed them to be in breach of contract

 

approximately may 2013.

 

yes there is a unresolved dispute

 

didn't need to enter into a debt management plan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok good

 

 

have you ack'd the claim [AOS] online at MCOL

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me I,m funny thought you,d used the post

 

DX

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx100uk,thanks for that,sorry,I think it was me that got the wrong impression.

 

 

Am I correct in thinking that I need to send a cca to Lowells,with a £1 p/o.

 

 

A cpr 31.14 to BC,with a £1 p/o.

 

 

And,do I need to send a cca to EE with a £1 p/o.

 

 

Sorry if I sound a bit dumb,i've never had these kind of dealings with anyone before,and it's all new to me.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cant CCA mobile debts they are not covered by the CCA

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

but the SAR will not come before filing data [40 cal days for sar]

33 cal days for def filing.

 

 

 

 

you can try but how will that help you

what are you hoping the SAR reveals?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi dx,

if they have to give me all the info they have about me,then I am assuming that would include any letters they sent to me,these would include the letter they sent informing me of a change to the t/c's.

and it would also show that there was no mention of my right to cancel,i'm hoping that I still have the original,but I think I might be clutching at straws.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go read a few those threads in that link I sent you.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...