Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cabot letter RE HSBC Loan


brokentechie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1517 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Post up that agreement and statement and redact any personal info from it. Others will comment on the rest.

  • Confused 1

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will need a fully compliant CCA before they can do anything. Cabot rarely ever have that correct paperwork. They wont even have it at all or even start to look for it until you ask.

 

 

For a debt that size, the oc would have taken it to court long ago instead of selling it to cabot. The debt is 100% a lemon debt, you just have to find out how. My moneys on no compliant paperwork.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you sent the CCA request, they have 12+ 2 days to get that agreement in a fully compliant form. They will try and say they have 40 days, but they have just 12+2. No agreement, means no court action and means you dont have to pay a penny.

 

Meanwhile, get a full SAR to the OC. You really need to be doing your full homework on this one, as if Cabot can come up with the correct agreement, you still need to find out why a debt that large was sold on. Cabot rarely ever deal in legit debts and certainly not legit debts that large.

 

remember, for a debt that large, cabot will be very greedy and will try and go to court as fast as they legally can hoping you will not realise and fall prey to them.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

There ya have it. Cabot dont have the CCA> What they sent you in response to the CCA request is not compliant.

 

Even for a reconsituted one, theyd need an app for, plus terms and conditions of the loan. Can you see them there? ;)

 

When did you take this loan out?

 

edit: i saw you posted: Experian the opening date of account is 2003,

 

Well done cabot, Youre chasing a lemon debt as you know you need the full original CCA to do anything since the agreement was took out that long ago.

 

Well done brokentechie.!! Theyre calling your bluff and hoping you dont realise its non compliant :) basically this account is dead in the water until they can get the original ( they cant which is why the OC didnt take court action) or it becomes Statute barred.

 

essentially, you just wiped this debt until one of the above 2 criteria are met. better luck next time cabot.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to find out why experian have that start date.

 

In any case, the CCA is still non compliant. So until one of the 2 requisites i mentioned are met, they can do bugger all.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

A reconstituted must have the app form and terms and conditions as reasonably close as possible.

 

What they gave you isnt that. Theres a bit of the original there, but the rest of it, even a complaint reconstituted part, is missing. So its UE, which is why ( in my opinion) the OC sold a debt that large for pennys to a DCA, instead of going to court and reclaiming the full amount themselves.

 

Have you done the SAR yet? Maybe that will show a lot more detail, including anything you can reclaim, or any underhanded moves on the banks part which caused them to get rid of the account.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

They still havent got the CCA no matter when it was taken out. Im sure the SAR will show up a lot of things too. Cabot know very well the CCA isnt complaint, but it wont stop them lying and trying to say they are right and you are wrong. All they see is the big number they can get off you and they get greedy as hell.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait and see what the Sar comes back with. Meanwhile if cabot continue to harass you, send them the letter from can library that says they haven't complied with your legal request.

 

They will try and say they have but they know very well they haven't

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...