That we would need to stop since their current Codes of Conduct are already unlawful and unfair. Unlawful as both advocate an extra £60 o £70 additional fees that none of them seem able to identify what they are for. Unfair since both want to include the 5 minute minimum Consideration  period into the period parking period when motorists decide to stay. But the CT is designed for motorists to read the T&Cs BEFORE parking so why is it then decided as parking after they opt to stay.

Agree and I can see the BPA/IPC shoving their new single Code under the noses of the new ministers saying don't waste any more time with your code use ours.

Sadly I think the fault les with the parking rogues who do not want te Act to come into force and are doing everything to fight and stall it.

Hopgarden I have problems understanding your PCNs. On Post 5 you said that you had received a PCN  dated  26th May 2021 received on the 1st June and was incurred on the 28th April. On Post 7 you said you had received a PCN dated the 7th July , received on the 1st June and incurred on the 28th April. I assume the 7th July was a mistake and there is just 1 PCN. On Post 47 you received from DCBL in response to your snotty letter a note from them saying that the PCN was dated the 23rd April. So my question is do you have two PCN dated 23 April and the 28th April or is one of those related you parents PCN. DCBL seemed sure that the PCN they were responding to was t he one on the 23rd. Also could you please check and confirm that the good news about the discontinuance on AUG 23RD 2023 was for a PCN dated the 23rd or the 28th?  Could you please also confirm who is the keeper of your car and you are advising your parents how to handle Parking Eye by copying from how you handle your own PCN? If that is the case is it possible to post up their PCN as it is possible that their times, dates and wording may differ from yours which might make a difference. I noted for instance that you said in an early post that your parents didn't even park in a bay. Possibly the time in the car park was shorter too.  In any case, both of you were parked in a car park that only permit holders were supposed to park. This makes the signs prohibitive so cannot offer either of you a contract. So you cannot breach a contract that hasn't been offered despite what they seem to think. Or more importantly what they want you to think, so that makes you feel like you should pay them what they are asking. When you don't actually owe them anything at all.