Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Paid loan off years ago. Still taking my money!!! Help!!!!


J-Do1979
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3407 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I could really do with some help.

I am at my wits end and banging my head against a brick wall.

I need to know who I can go to legally to help me with this as I have no confidence that

I am going to get anywhere through complaining directly to Student Loans Company.

 

I enclose the complaint letter I sent below to SLC which should give you a good idea of what the issues are:

 

I write to complain about the shocking level of service I have received over the past 5 years

and the fact that you are still taking repayments despite the fact I paid my loan off years ago.

 

I first complained in 2010 when I noticed that deductions had started to be made for student loans once again,

despite the fact that I know I had paid this off in about 2007. (I went to Uni 1998 - 2001)

 

I worked for the same company from 2002 to 2007 and during this time earned more than enough to pay the loan off

– I was earning between £50k and 90k at the time.

I remember calling the loan company 1 year before it was paid off and working out with you how much was left

so I categorically know that I did pay it off, and indeed made a few months of over-payments.

 

In 2010 when working for a new company, I noticed on my pay check that student loan deductions had started to come out again

so I called you and was informed that for some reason, for tax year 2004 – 2005 and 2005 – 2006 there was no records at all from HMRC about deductions.

 

I looked through my files and sent you through what payslips I had which clearly showed massive deductions for both of these tax years,

one of these pay slips is from the end of tax year 2004/05 and shows the accumlative amounts of what I had been paid that year and my tax deductions

- i was confident from this that you would therefore be able to work out what student loan contributions I had made.

 

Not long after I left work and fell ill and didn’t work for a few years so obviously wasn’t paying any student loan deductions

and it became something I didn’t worry about as I had my illness to try and recover from.

 

I have recently started working again and noticed once again these repayments being taken.

I called up and was told that the amount I owe has reduced as finally, 7 YEARS after, HMRC have finally submitted info for tax year 2005/6

– so here is evidence that the system doesn’t work as this should be submitted the same / following year and has clearly been lost in the system for 7 years.

 

I have now been told that the only way you will do anything is if I can provide evidence to show the payments made.

I am astounded by this for the following reasons:

 

1) It is not my responsibility to inform you of what payments I have made – this falls to my employer, HMRC and SLC.

 

2) The fact that I don’t have every payslip from 10 years ago should not make me accountable for the fact

that you don’t have the information and therefore I will have to keep making payments

 

3) It is clearly your system that is flawed and its fundamentally wrong that I am a victim of that.

YOU should do something to improve your system and rectify the error that has clearly been made on my account.

 

4) All of the evidence that you do have – the payments I made in preceding and subsequent years plus the 3 payslips

you do have for tax year 2004/5 all point towards the fact that you are missing information NOT that I haven’t made repayments.

It is also abundantly clear that the amounts I have paid show that the missing amounts would more than pay off my loan.

Again, this is YOUR fault and I should not be made to pay for this.

 

TO make matters even worse, the employer I had in 2004/5 is no longer in existence so I cannot look to them for answers either!

 

My financial situation is vastly different from that of 10 years ago.

My illness caused me to not be able to work and as a result I had to go bankrupt in December 2014.

Clearly, having loan deductions wrongly taken from my pay currently, is having more of a negative impact on my life

when I am doing my best to recover from what was an awful time for me.

 

 

I now feel like I am in a nightmare because neither you nor HMRC are willing to take any responsibility

for your errors and the only person this is having a consequence on is me.

 

Your system of compulsory payments is flawed and unethical because regardless of the fact that it’s your system and processes that are flawed

, it is me who has to continue making payments and you seem to be quite happy with this!

 

It should not be my responsibility to give you evidence of my payments when the system has never demanded this of me before.

Clearly if I had known I should keep payslips from 10 years ago “just in case” the organisations

I have trusted with my money really mess up, then I would have!!!

 

I will be taking this further and seeking legal advice,

I have also approached BBC Watchdog who I know have already investigated similar stories to this.

 

Finally, I am disgusted by the lack of customer care

– in that I have contacted you numerous times over the years and 5 years on,

I am no further on, and not once have I received correspondence from you on this matter

– it has always been me who has had to contact you.

 

 

You did not even have the courtesy to inform me that you would not be doing anything further on this as HMRC

couldn’t provide you with any evidence.

 

 

If I had not called today, I would have only realised this to be the case when another deduction inevitably comes out of this month’s pay check.

 

I have been asked to resubmit the evidence I sent to you in 2010 (which for some reason only went on to your system in March of 2013 – 3 years later)

which I will do this weekend.

 

 

I trust it will not take yet another 3 years for it to be considered and look forward to hearing from you soon."

 

 

 

Can anyone point me to anyone who could help??

I have worked out that they must owe me at least £3k and still continue to take money from me every month.

 

 

Is there any way I can stop the payments from happening until this situation is rectified??

 

 

Surely they just cant keep taking money when its blatently obvious that the mistake is theirs, not mine?? Please help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

How are loan instalments made? By DD?

 

Send an SAR to the SLC, and anyone else who might have records of the payments. Your bank, your employer, ex-employer, the administrator of that employer.

 

Even if you can't get everything, if you can show some pattern of taking payments when they were not entitled to, this will probably be enough to base a claim for everything they have taken.

If the money is going out through DD then issue a written instruction to your bank to stop and ask for repayment of all payments covered by the DD guarantee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No its the HMRC that tell my employer to take the money. They are insisting i keep having to pay because they are missing information of payments i made back in 2004, even though I know I made those payments. My issue is that there is an obvious flaw in their system and they are clearly missing my repayment information - even though they acknowledge this to an extent, the missing payments mean that according to them i still owe over £2k so they keep taking money from my account with authorisation from HMRC. I need to know how i can fight this as at the moment i am completely helpless and at the mercy of a system which allows repayments to come directly from my monthly pay, even though I know I have paid it off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send an SAR to HMRC as well as to the SLC to see what you can get

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not sure how that would help. I have requested SARs before but in this instance, its the fact that there isnt information where there should be thats the problem.

Basically, when you pay your student loan, they are compulsory deductions that come off your paycheck after you earn a certain amount.

Rather than being a direct link from me to the Student Loan Co, the money goes through HMRC, who then inform the SLC at the end of every year, through a P60, how much money I have paid off my loan.

For whatever reason, the information for tax year 04'05 is missing, so it looks as though i havent made any payments, when I know for a fact that I have. I found 3 payslips from that year to support this and sent them off to the student loans co. Even though they now have this evidence to show i had made payments that year, so it stands to reason that they are just missing information and not that i didnt make payments, they are still insisting on taking more money from me.

A SAR would not help this as they are missing information. Its more a case of their processes being flawed and that I am being made accountable for their errors and the breakdown in communication between my ex employer, HMRC and SLC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HMRC as you have seen and indeed SLC are large organizations. Yo are dealing with one or two teams form said organizations.

 

A SAR will force ALL teams in said organizations to look for the information in order to comply with the sar, failing to do so can lead to court action taken by yourself.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They must re4spond to the SAR, they will be accountable if they lost the information.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...