Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I applied to the Court to act as litigation friend has my son is Severely Mentally Impaired and sent the proof they requested from his GP so I thought this might have been accepted without a hearing. I cannot believe the claimant is still convinced my son was the driver.
    • I had to call an ambulance for my wife, but one of the paramedics was not happy, about the condition of our house, as it's cluttered. And he  would only see to my wife, on the ambulance itself. After diagnosis they took my wife to hospital. My wife was ill for a few months, and received help from the district nurses. We then got a call from a social worker, who wanted to visit us, and discuss ways to make my wife more comfortable. When I asked for more details, she became vague, but could give us a phone number, if she visited. I politely declined her offer, as I was coping, along with my daughter in caring for my wife. Then a letter arrived from another social worker, saying similar things, to the first. I didn't bother to reply. Another letter has just turned up, from the social services legal department, which doesn't say anything specific, but refers to the other social workers trying to visit us. Coming from a legal department, has badly upset my wife, who's recovery was on going, and she now fears that someone will be coming to the house, to do whatever. Do we have to respond, or take notice of these people. Also we recently had a fire prevention officer come and fit, smoke and heat detectors. He didn't voice any concerns with the conditions at the property. Worried, Paul.
    • By not sticking to the deadline which you set you have lost credibility. Your letter of claim becomes one of hundreds of others which they receive and which they put in the bin because they think that you are just bluffing.  
    • 05.05.24 Ever so sorry if I have entered this in the wrong part of this website.   My grandfather is in his 70's and retired.  He asked me to help him find a work pension that he was paying into when he was working. From 1967 - 1982 he worked for a Fabric Dying Company, Celanese, Spondon Derby UK. I have already used the GOV.uk Trace Pension Scheme. It listed a few pension companies : Akzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme formerly Courtaulds Pension Scheme.  I do not fully understand how this works but I think this scheme is administer by a company called Willis Tower Watson. We have called this company, got through to the pension department submitted all my grandfather's details (D.O.B. , N.I. no. etc.) but that agent tells that they have no record of my grandfather and ask what is the name of the pension scheme. Here is the problem, his home was burgalled in 2005 and a briefcase which contained his legal documents was stolen. So he does not know who was the Pension Scheme company. I have a this phone number 01332 681 210 for Celanese but it just rings and never gets answered. So I am asking for help if anyone can tell us where we can try next. I am also hoping for a massive long shot that one of them members on this website, worked for or knows someone who worked for British Celanese Spondon Derby and could tell us of any pension company. Thanks for any help.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

GE Money - Unregulated Loan taken out July 2006


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3307 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Dropping in as requested by Caro.

 

I have had dealings with GE and on that case even their solicitor said to get away from them as soon as humanly possible.

They are a nasty bunch and should stick to what they are good at which is light bulbs.

 

Trouble is, when you are in arrears it will be extremely difficult to get another lender with whom you can remortgage.

 

The FCA (formerly the FSA) published a paper which said it was unfair to charge arrears charges when a borrower is in an agreed payment arrangement.

As a result any such charges which were put on to the account under those circumstances should be refunded to the account plus any interest charged as a result.

 

That is not the only reason because those charges are unlawful anyway because they do not represent the true cost to the company

following the breach of contract (i.e. the failure to make payments).

 

You should be claiming back the £40 charges plus the interest charged as a result of them and that will bring the overall balance down.

 

Generally, GE do not add the charges to the arrears figure.

If you look at your statements carefully you will see that they pop your charges and legal fees into a distinct pot

and any payments you make over and above the CMI must come off the arrears first.

Again, if you examine your statements carefully you should see that this is the case.

 

However, your overall balance is increasing due to the charges and legal costs being added

and what they (and all lenders do) is add those charges and fees to the overall balance and charge interest on them.

That will be mentioned in your T&Cs somewhere.

 

This is why they increase the CMI because these additional costs add to the balance outstanding

and in order to clear the balance at the agreed time the CMI has to increase by a few pence or a few pounds to cover those.

 

If you find that the extra payments being made over and above your CMI are not going to the actual arrears balance

then GE are in trouble, especially if the court have order that to clear the arrears it will be at a rate of CMI plus £x.

That £x must be allocated to arrears, not anything else.

 

So, when you reclaim the unlawful charges, you would use the interest rate that you have been charged on the account.

This means that you get the charges back plus the interest they have charged you.

That reduces the overall balance and should reduce the CMI slightly.

 

In respect of charging a solicitor's fee when no one turned up at court,

I would challenge them on that as well since you would have been charged on a time basis (or an estimate thereof)

and if no-one pitched up then you should ask for a detailed breakdown of that charge.

 

Have you been charged for home visits/counsellor's where they didn't turn up or which you did not agree to?

That is another ploy for GE to make money out of you.

If you have been charged for these under these circumstances claim those back as well together with interest as discussed above.

 

Hope this helps.

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi

 

Popping in as requested by Caro.

 

The spreadsheet you will need is the second one down in the first post here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

CISheet c101.

 

For the interest you should work out the average of the rate you have been charged since the first charge that you wish to reclaim and use that average rate.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...