Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Link proof of CCJ


Hime
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3320 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

that's link for you.

 

 

the CCJ is dead and buried

 

 

doesn't matter if they know the number or not.

 

 

I have a feeling your real issue here is you keep entertaining letter tennis.

 

 

should have been one letter

 

 

the CCJ is now outside of 6yrs old

you were not the claimant

you have not been substituted as the claimant

 

 

until or unless I receive a court date you are now being ignored

 

 

I admit no debt to you or your invisible clients.

 

 

bye bye PLINK

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it wont,

 

 

ignore them

 

 

they'll zoon give up.

 

 

phonecalls...in writing only ..drop call.

 

 

letters scan and shred.

 

 

if you ever get bored and think of entertaining them

then stop and scan up all the letters from them.

 

 

we'd like a laugh!!

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like a laugh too & this company certainly can be, unfortunatly other times they are a pain but I must admit everytime I get one of their letters & see the PO box Carephilly adress on the back it does make me smile! I actually get a bit dissapointed when it's just a statement of their accounts!

Anyway yes when I have more time I will scan & upload all the letters but it's a bit of a mission as there are lots!

The only other last thing to ask.

I've been going along the lines of trying to get this lawfully settled now as I do often wonder if they were to change the law of the limitations act??

I trust this goverment about as much as I do link and I'm sure the owner of link is in the circle of make a donation or take a politician on a cruise somewhere & hay presto the law changes & suddenly these debts are valid...or am I being a touch paranoid?!

 

 

you are...........

 

 

if you do scan them

redact and put the pix into a multipage word doc

then PDF and shrink that

for the sake of the server please don't upload every letter singularly

as somehow that seems to be the norm at present

1 page = +3MB and the thread takes ages to load on a

 

 

even 100pages can be less than 1Mb in a word doc

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCJ over 6 years old ....

 

 

It may drop off your CRA,s but it is still there

 

 

...the Judgment creditor would have to revert back and attain permission from the court to execute it.

 

 

An action cannot be brought on any judgment after the expiry of 6 years from the date it became enforceable.

 

 

The term “action” only applies to the commencement of fresh proceedings on a judgment,

it does not include enforcement proceedings

 

 

so, strictly speaking,

for enforcement purposes and enforcement proceedings, no limitation period applies.

 

 

However, any delay in enforcement on the part of the judgment creditor will affect any award of interest

as recoverable interest is limited to 6 years on a judgment that is executed after the expiry of the 6 year period.

 

 

.....

 

 

extremely rare for a debt buyer to get themselves substituted after 6yrs

even rarer than above

 

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

time to ignore everyone now

 

 

told you to do that post 2.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they can write all they like

the debt might be SB'd or whatever, but in E&W it still exists and can be chased

 

 

they thought they'd found a mug

you found CAG.

 

 

ignore now.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

if you have concrete evidence that they made all these phone calls to people etc etc

 

 

I'd be onto the FCA like a shot.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can assure you the FCA will be very interested in the evidence you have.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...