Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Received PCN from PE at Morrisons


Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I request for somebody's attention in helping me out here.

 

Yesterday, I received a PCN in the post for £85 (£50 if paid within 14 days) from PE with ANPR showing my number plate overstaying 39 minutes more than the prescribed 2hours max. stay at Morrisons. I did go to the car park on the mentioned date but there was a massive traffic jam because of Guy Fawkes night and it took me 45 minutes to get out of the parking lot, all the time standing in the jam.

 

I have gone through the threads and almost all of them refer to the cases where there is no traffic jam causing delays. I have to reply back to them but I am confused whether to go the regular route (the standard reply templates on this website) and question their GPEOL or should I mention them the reason for delay as Traffic Jam and refute their claim.

 

If in my response I am mentioning the reason for delay as traffic jam and referring to myself as the registered keeper would it be better to put it as..... "I have been informed by the driver about the delays due to traffic jam....." or would it be better to just say about the traffic jam directly without referring to the driver part (which may/may not highlight me as the driver)?

 

Any advice is greatly appreciated.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just appeal to PE with;

 

As registered keeper of vehicle reg xxx xxx I have received your parking charge notice xxxx xxxx.

 

I wish to make it clear that I am not liable for this charge.

 

Please cancel this charge forthwith, or alternatively issue a valid code for the independent appeals service POPLA.

 

I am under no obligation to name the driver at the time of event.

 

No further correspondence with Parking Eye will be entered into regarding this matter.'

 

Head the letter appeal in big writing.

 

 

In the meantime get down to Morrisons and complain vigorously about a valued customer being sent demands for money, when their own car park management systems , caused you to lose 45 minutes of your day!!

Don't take no for an answer as they can get the charge cancelled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to both of you for your replies. So from armadillo71 message, does it mean that there is no point in defending the case with PE. Instead just try to go for POPLA. Is this correct? I will also try to speak to Morrisons rep. but even if they assure me that they will get the charge cancelled, how will i get confirmation that PE will not come back later with a court summon as I will not be paying them? Will they be sending any confirmation if Morrisons asks them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to both of you for your replies. So from armadillo71 message, does it mean that there is no point in defending the case with PE. Instead just try to go for POPLA. Is this correct? I will also try to speak to Morrisons rep. but even if they assure me that they will get the charge cancelled, how will i get confirmation that PE will not come back later with a court summon as I will not be paying them? Will they be sending any confirmation if Morrisons asks them?

 

 

You are appealing to PE so they can't issue a claim because you ignored the charge notice. You will win at POPLA so, yes you want them to give you the code ( which they have to. )

 

 

At the same time you have to complain to the manager of the store, about the distressing claim for money that you have received, due to the traffic management system that is in place.

As already said, morrisons can and should get the charge cancelled. You have to not be fobbed off by the manager.

There is an email address for the head honcho, but I can't find it at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply. I will reply as advised. If you can find the Morrisons Manger id, could you please give it to me. Meanwhile I will also try to search it on the website.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...