Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Like
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3471 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

 

Not sure where I stand with this but thought I would post before contacting head office.

 

 

Our account is in my Mrs name so when the laptop started to develop a few minor faults I let it roll as they were nothing major but then more and more faults developed so I told my mrs to take it into shop for repair.

 

 

She came back with a new laptop and said she had been told in the shop there was nothing they can do as they don't deal with Acer no more and if they sent it to them for repair then they would just refuse to repair it.

 

 

Now I find this totally hard to believe and surely my rights here are that they should fix it or replace it. With being told this she signed up for a replacement laptop which I was told today nothing I had paid off the previous laptop counts. Whats more annoying is he said there was only 15 weeks of a 102 week deal to be paid off.

 

 

Any advice where I stand on this matter appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet again Brighthouse shrugging off responsibility. Under the Supply of Goods Act (because it's Hire Purchase), anything under 6 months old the onus is on Brighthouse to prove the fault was not present at point of purchase, after 6 months it falls to the customer to show a manufacturing fault etc - but as far as I'm aware it should last a suitable length of time depending on how much the laptop cost (and we know with Brighthouse they're extortionate!).

 

My advice would be to contact them either the store or Customer Services and put the situation to them and ask for a refund of the item as they have effectively refused a repair. Just because they don't deal with Acer any more isn't your fault - if you were still paying for an item ultimately it's still theirs and to a degree their responsibility to sort problems.

 

Don't give up without a fight! (I'm sure as hell not as they owe me £2500 in charges, mis-sold OSC and forced DLC insurance, next step Court!)

 

PS was your partner aware they'd taken out forced DLC and OSC now under the guise of 64% apr? (Which should be made illegal, moreso for the apr rate!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Ann-Marie at BrightHouse

Good Morning mart2012

 

I am sorry to hear of the difficulties you and your partner seemed to have had with the Laptop.

 

We do provide a repair and replacement service, however, in order for us to look into why your partner seems to have had issues arranging this, I kindly request for the account holder to contact our Customer Relations Team on 0800 526 069. If she would prefer, she can also email [email protected]

 

We would also be happy to discuss resolving this matter with you, however, we would need verbal authorization from your partner in order to this.

 

Many Thanks

 

Allen

 

Web Relations Team

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Morning mart2012

 

Firstly I would like to apologise if you have failed to receive a response to your emails that you have sent.

 

I have raised this matter with the Customer Relations Team.

 

Please can you re-send your original email but in the 'subject line' please head your email with: CAG REF 101437

 

Alternatively, you can contact our Customer Relations Team on 0800 526 069 quoting your reference 101437.

 

I apologise for any inconvenience caused and we look forward to hearing from you.

 

Best wishes

 

Jason

 

Web Relations Team

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear mart2012,

 

Thank you for the update.

 

I have notified the Customer Relations Team that you have now sent the email.

 

They will review the details and respond as soon as they can.

 

Thank you for your patience so far.

 

Jason

 

Web Relations Team

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...