Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
    • Whilst trying to point score over Biden, Trump can't remember the name of his own doctor. Trump gets name of his doctor wrong as he challenges Biden to cognitive test | Donald Trump | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Gaffe came as 78-year-old Republican presidential candidate sought to bolster his support among Black and Latino voters in Michigan  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

DWP contacting the place where I do my voulantary work. (Data protection violation ?)


Skycow
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3622 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, First post and all, so if its in the wrong place, please forgive and relocate :)

 

I spend 2 (Thur/Sat)days a week doing voluntary work at the salvation army, I have aranged this on my own after my Mandatory work placement, I have been there since February.

 

I was told by the assistant I work with on Thursday that she had received a call from someone saying they where from the DWP on Monday (the day I have a interview with them) and that they where checking what days I attend and how much I claim to make sure I wasn't claiming expense twice (Not stupid enough to even try that). now of course she gave the information out which I think is a breach of the data protection act.

 

I just want to get it all straight in my head about who was in the wrong, before I take things further.

 

Was the DWP wrong to ask for this information knowing it is in violation of DPA ?

 

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DWP was not wrong, as such, although they really shouldn't be making these calls.

 

The SA should not have answered the DWP's questions, and if there is a DPA breach, that's where it lies.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, thanks for the fast update.

Trying to get all my ducks in a row before I start complaining :)

 

 

Before you start complaining any breach of the DPA is with the assistant and the salvation army , if you raise a complaint it might make it impossible to remain as a volunteer at that location depending on what action the salvation army take against your colleague

Link to post
Share on other sites

Before you start complaining any breach of the DPA is with the assistant and the salvation army , if you raise a complaint it might make it impossible to remain as a volunteer at that location depending on what action the salvation army take against your colleague

 

Yes, this is worth keeping in mind.

 

If it were me, I'd let this one go, but Vinny47 is correct, I think. If you choose to pursue the matter, it could jeopardise your volunteering. You've every right to complain about a DPA breach, of course, but consider the possible consequences.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah, I understand if I was to take it further up the chain of command to her manager etc, it could complicate things. However I have a good work relationship with her so it will be more of an informal "oh by the way, been reading up on it apparently you should not have given that info out" type of chat, and Not a going directly to management making a huge fuss over it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Before you jump in - it may depend on who (at the DWP) was making the enquiry. If there had been an allegation that you had been working at the Salvation Army, and was being looked at by Fraud, then a request for information by an Authorised Officer is outside DPA under the detection and prevention of crime. A person who is asked for information is required to provide this or they could face prosecution by failing to do so. Saying that though, request for information are made usually by letter or face to face.

 

It is possible that it was thought to be the easiest way to clear up and allegation that you were undertaking paid work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do two voluntary roles, DWP have never contacted either - can't remember name of form but I filled in something to explainmy hours and that is was ZERO pay and was left alone - they just update your notes to say you are doing voluntary work - I have not had a problem. As far as I am concerened if DWP want to contact where Ivolunteer they can waste their time doing so - also gets me out of around 10 hours a week job searching for fake jobs

Link to post
Share on other sites

when I worked for the DWP it was amazing the amount of info people would be willing to give over the phone about someone else - and for those that wouldn't, a fax on headed paper was enough to get the info. In almost all cases the person I was asking had no signed authority or even verbal authority to provide the information by the person concerned.

 

Of course a claim form gives authority to make checks into certain things.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read this thread with interest as I manage a Charity shop (Not SA) and have volunteers who are on JSA (not mandated).

 

 

I needed to ensure that I personally would be doing the correct thing if ever approached by the DWP so I asked my Area Manager for my own companies stance on /understanding of DPA issues.

 

 

This is how we work when we have a volunteer who is on JSA we ask if the JC are happy with them volunteering, once the hours/days worked have been agreed we advise them to fill out a volunteering form issued by the JCA, we don't police this, we don't make this a condition of volunteering, the onus is on the volunteer to give the JC the correct info.

 

 

Therefore if we are approached by the DWP it would not be a breach of the DPA we would only be confirming the info the volunteer should already have given, the same way its not a breach of the DPA for a company to give salary details to a bank if an employee applies for a mortgage or give dates worked to a company seeking a reference for an ex employee.

 

 

She also advised me that we could get into trouble as a company if we gave false information to the DWP for instance saying Mary Brown only worked on Monday and they found out she worked all week for us.

 

 

That saying I don't have incoming number identification on my work phone not do we have a computer to check reverse telephone number sites, therefore I personally would not give any information over the phone about any volunteer, I don't give my own personal details over the phone to people calling from withheld numbers or from a number I can't check therefore I wouldn't give out anyone else's. I personally I would want any requests in writing OR I would refer them to the volunteer co-ordinator in my company who I send attendance sheets to every week and is part of the payroll/HR facility and would know just what information to supply and who to, and of course I would inform the volunteer that the DWP were on the snoop.

 

 

As to the Sales Assistant in the SA she most likely had full management responsibilities for the shop in the manager absence and would answer phones and give info as part of her job, however the manager would have overall say and would be responsible for training her assistant in procedures, if the OP is unhappy I would suggest they do speak to the actual manager to clarify the situation

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...