Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
    • Whilst trying to point score over Biden, Trump can't remember the name of his own doctor. Trump gets name of his doctor wrong as he challenges Biden to cognitive test | Donald Trump | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Gaffe came as 78-year-old Republican presidential candidate sought to bolster his support among Black and Latino voters in Michigan  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Outstanding debt by my new partner and her ex - £40K


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3663 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guy's,

 

My new partner and her ex fell Into financial trouble after a job loss and subsequently their house was repossessed and sold with o/s debt. She has now had letters and set-up a payment plan of what she can afford.

 

If I was to offer a % of this debt would it remove her liability for the remaining debt ??

 

We are wanting this nightmare to end and need to get on with our new life together without looking over our shoulder

 

HELP PLS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know if the ex has also set up a plan or has he dumped it all in your partner's lap ?

 

I will try and find someone who can help :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, offering a settlement for her 'share' won't work - it would have to be a settlement for the whole. Your partner and her ex are jointly and severally liable for the shortfall, and the mortgagee will take it from whoever is easiest to obtain it from.

 

If you are in a position to offer a settlement figure for the whole, you can do this. If it is accepted and paid, then your partner is free to sue her ex for 50% of that settlement figure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can word the offer so that it does exactly what you say.... Remove your partners liability for the debt. That way they will go for the remaining amount from the other person.

 

You are more likely to get accepted on those terms than a full and final offer IMO.

 

Go for it - I would hope you should see 50% after negotiation but start lower than that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, offering a settlement for her 'share' won't work - it would have to be a settlement for the whole. Your partner and her ex are jointly and severally liable for the shortfall, and the mortgagee will take it from whoever is easiest to obtain it from.

 

If you are in a position to offer a settlement figure for the whole, you can do this. If it is accepted and paid, then your partner is free to sue her ex for 50% of that settlement figure.

 

I have seen this done successfully. Rather than settle for the whole, the person settled to absolve their liability. For about 40% IIRC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can word the offer so that it does exactly what you say.... Remove your partners liability for the debt. That way they will go for the remaining amount from the other person.

 

You cannot remove a partner's liability - each partner is liable for the whole of any unpaid debt.

 

If a creditor can get money from one party, they will do so with no regard for who owes what part of joint debts.

 

I can't see how or why a creditor would agree to collect only half a debt from one party, and then go after the other party. They have no need to do this.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen this done successfully. Rather than settle for the whole, the person settled to absolve their liability. For about 40% IIRC.

 

Where, when and how exactly? This anecdotal type of statement never holds up in the face of reality, unfortunately.

 

The mortgagee already has a money judgment for the outstanding debt, which, since the house is sold and the shortfall is established, is £40k. You're suggesting to the OP that the mortgagee will happily settle for £10k (50% of the shared liability), yet they have a judgment for the full £40k...they have zero reason to accept 50% of the whole, let alone a mere 25%.

 

The mortgagee can pursue both parties, or one, it makes no difference to them so long as someone pays up.

 

My advice stands; the partner and her ex are jointly and severally liable for the debt, and if the partner pays off 50% then goes on to buy something else, they'll come after her for the remaining 50% (or slap a charge on the new house) - because they almost certainly won't agree to discharge her liability - and particularly in circumstances where they see her offering lump sum payments!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know if the ex has also set up a plan or has he dumped it all in your partner's lap ?

 

I will try and find someone who can help :)

 

I have no idea what, if anything is being paid by the other party. My partners plan is very minimal as she rents currently and doesn't earn a mass amount anyway. I'd think that a one off lump sum from me is better than 20yrs of a v.small amount ??

 

Help

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea what, if anything is being paid by the other party. My partners plan is very minimal as she rents currently and doesn't earn a mass amount anyway. I'd think that a one off lump sum from me is better than 20yrs of a v.small amount ??

 

Help

 

Sadly, as you can see from responses by Slick and Leah, this is a joint debt and it is unlikely they creditor will accept that she is only responsible for half the debt

:(

 

If she were to apply for Bankruptcy, then the creditor would focus on the ex partner for full settlement.

 

As she has entered into a payment plan, I would say she has acknowledged the liability

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I can't see how or why a creditor would agree to collect only half a debt from one party, and then go after the other party. They have no need to do this.

 

 

Oh it does happen, and quite often. They'll accept a percentage in full & final settlement of one person's liability. This allows the lender to go after the other party still but not the person that has made the settlement - the lender would be estopped from doing so. I've done scores of these for people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presumably there would have to be a cast iron, in writing, gaurantee that the person would no longer be pursued !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presumably there would have to be a cast iron, in writing, gaurantee that the person would no longer be pursued !

 

100% without any doubt. That's a very good point as some people don't follow the right process only for it to really bite them later on down the line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your partner has no assets and subject to the usual caveats then going BR could be a more attractive and neater option.

They would be cut loose financially from their previous relationships.

Worth exploring.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If your partner has no assets and subject to the usual caveats then going BR could be a more attractive and neater option.

They would be cut loose financially from their previous relationships.

Worth exploring.

 

How can I find out if both parties are paying ?? Is this easy ?? We've not discussed bankruptcy !! I'd like a 25% - 30% payment to be accepted and then walk if possible

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps I should have been more precise in my wording earlier.

 

She is joint and severally liable. When I said earlier 40%, I meant of the whole debt (which she can be held liable for). So I hope i haven't raised expectations of 25%...

 

As for finding out if someone else is paying, she can ask for statements if she is not getting them annually. That will show the payment history.

 

It might be worth phoning National Debtline to explore your options. I didn't recklessly post an anecdote in post #5, but I can't find the link. However, National Debtline will know if that is an option open to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...