Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Motormile


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3490 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Couldnt the forum undertake a mass complaint directed towards the FCA. It may have more clout towards sorting these people out once and for all.

I have in the past collected an collated numerous letters/e-mails etc., and have passed them on to the OFT and its successor.

 

 

I'm happy to do it again and can provide a dedicated e-mail address for users to send copies of document.

(that is of course CAG admin approves)

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It must be a huge task but sadly the OFT FCA seem to have little will to do anything about it.

Of course separate complaints may have more effect as you have to sign complaint forms and put real details as opposed to user names

 

That is not to dismiss the effort that was put in before

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

It must be a huge task but sadly the OFT FCA seem to have little will to do anything about it.

Of course separate complaints may have more effect as you have to sign complaint forms and put real details as opposed to user names

 

That is not to dismiss the effort that was put in before

 

 

We have a distinct opportunity here with companies operating on "interim permissions" which means a review of licences is in the offing.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

In 2011 I had an account with WDA which defaulted . During various conversations with them and while there was an ongoing dispute they added over £400 of charges and sold the debt to MMF. Eventually after the BCCA became involved they cut the alleged debt to £450 (from £1300 ) and recalled it from MMF . I have this in writing. Today I noticed on Noddle that MMF have registered a default dated 2011 for 1316 against my name. What is my best approach . I already have ongoing complaints with the CSA?Fos/Fos/Ico about another complaint with them for a different PDL. They have only updated the file from June 2014 , prior to that there is nothing at all

 

I have no issue with the default per se , it is with MMF

 

If its been recalled to the OC MMF are acting in a vexatious manner, personally I would make a formal complaint to the CRAs data control director copy to Neil Petty (by name and nature imo).

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brig

I have complained to Noddle and also written a letter that I will send signed for . I strongly suspect they are acting , as you say, in a vexatious matter. I will post the letter to the Data controller and email the usual suspects with a disclaimer that the email is NOT to be used for replies .

Do you think that sounds reasonable?

 

I know this is one of your specialities

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brig

I have complained to Noddle and also written a letter that I will send signed for . I strongly suspect they are acting , as you say, in a vexatious matter. I will post the letter to the Data controller and email the usual suspects with a disclaimer that the email is NOT to be used for replies .

Do you think that sounds reasonable?

 

I know this is one of your specialities

 

 

Not the first one I've seen this week and it's only Tuesday!

Keep the pressure up!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brig

Do complaints with the ICO influence anything?

 

Obviously , in someways it would be better if they didn't sort it out as I could then go to the FOS etc . My credit is shot to sh1t anyway although I was due to be down to fewer defaults this year, two more added by our dear friends.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brig

Do complaints with the ICO influence anything?

 

Obviously , in someways it would be better if they didn't sort it out as I could then go to the FOS etc . My credit is shot to sh1t anyway although I was due to be down to fewer defaults this year, two more added by our dear friends.

 

 

Unfortunately the ICO takes " views" on matters and relies on deciding on breaches of its principles .

Often vague, stating what it may expect to happen without any enforcement being available to make something happen.

e.g. Providing an agreement with a SAR.

 

 

No " resolution" in 56 days go to FOS anyway!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well MMF as usual are following their own complaints procedure to the letter I don't think. No acknowledgement of to my complaint which they received by email on 12th and by post on 14th. According to their complaints policy they will try to fix it it 1 working day and if not reply within 5 working days haha bloody ha. I will give t a few more days then it will be off to the CSA and in 6 more weeks off to the FCA

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well MMF as usual are following their own complaints procedure to the letter I don't think. No acknowledgement of to my complaint which they received by email on 12th and by post on 14th. According to their complaints policy they will try to fix it it 1 working day and if not reply within 5 working days haha bloody ha. I will give t a few more days then it will be off to the CSA and in 6 more weeks off to the FCA

 

 

I thought the complaints procedure was more than a little "optimistic" in regard to the time scales claimed, little hope of any being met.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update

Finally an acknowledgement from the Fos that they have asked MMF for the details

Almost certainly in the first instance they will not uphold my complaint but I will then escalate it

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Interesting email from the CSA

Still claim that they were right to enter the WDA default on my file (although they bought it in 2012 and did not enter it until 2014) and the reason they did not answer me was because they had received official communication from the Fos and ICO

However as a gesture of good will they are removing the default and writing off the accounts

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting email from the CSA

Still claim that they were right to enter the WDA default on my file (although they bought it in 2012 and did not enter it until 2014) and the reason they did not answer me was because they had received official communication from the Fos and ICO

However as a gesture of good will they are removing the default and writing off the accounts

 

 

 

Good result Fletch!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...